Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsWindows VistaWindows XPWindows MeWindows 98Windows 95Virtual PCInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressWindows MediaSecurity
Related Topics
MS Server ProductsMS OfficePC HardwareMore Topics ...

Windows Forum / Outlook Express / OE 6.x / May 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Character wrapping in posts

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Kate - 14 May 2008 23:50 GMT
I have noticed that, on my computer, when I post to an NG and my post
is repeated in the reply, the lines of text I sent are all over the
place and not as they appear when I first post.  At present, I have
set character wrapping at 75 characters, and have tried using other
line lengths, but it makes no difference.  Is there a "standard" wrap
length?  Other people`s posts always appear properly wrapped, so can
someone tell me what I am doing wrong, please?

Thank you
Kate
Bruce Hagen - 15 May 2008 01:19 GMT
76 is the default setting, but 75 should be fine. If the original post you
send shows correctly, then it is probably not on your end. Do check however,
that you are using the correct resolution setting your monitor is designed
for.
Signature

          Bruce Hagen
MS-MVP Outlook Express
     Imperial Beach, CA

>I have noticed that, on my computer, when I post to an NG and my post
> is repeated in the reply, the lines of text I sent are all over the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Thank you
> Kate
Frank Saunders MS-MVP IE,OE/WM - 15 May 2008 01:23 GMT
>I have noticed that, on my computer, when I post to an NG and my post
> is repeated in the reply, the lines of text I sent are all over the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> length?  Other people`s posts always appear properly wrapped, so can
> someone tell me what I am doing wrong, please?

That doesn't seem to be the case this time.

Signature

Frank Saunders MS-MVP IE,OE/WM
Do not reply with email

Michael Santovec - 15 May 2008 02:29 GMT
What you are seeing is a common problem.  It's not limited to you.

If you are using Uuencode (non-MIME) format, as is common in newsgroups,
and the replier does as well, a "> " is inserted in front of every line
from the original post.  That makes the line 2 characters longer.
Unless the replier has his line wrap set at least 2 higher than yours,
then the lines may get broken.  And the next replier needs his set 2
higher and so on.

Some news readers reflow the lines in order to avoid the alternating
long/short lines.

If you use MIME quoted-printable format (which HTML does by default),
then the wrapping is handled differently (not necessarily better).

And if in a thread different people use different news readers with
different options, things can end up all over the place.

Personally, I don't worry about it as long as I can make out what the
message says.

Signature

Mike - http://pages.prodigy.net/michael_santovec/techhelp.htm

> I have noticed that, on my computer, when I post to an NG and my post
> is repeated in the reply, the lines of text I sent are all over the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Thank you
> Kate
Robert Aldwinckle - 15 May 2008 06:28 GMT
>I have noticed that, on my computer, when I post to an NG

> and my post is repeated in the reply,

Don't worry about what your post looks like when quoted by someone else.
That's their line wrapping and  Format=Flowed  options at work (or not.)

All you can be concerned about is what *your* post looks like.

I use a line length of 132 and manually "flow" my paragraphs.
Then when I send them to the Outbox or save them in Drafts
I have to do  Ctrl-a,Ctrl-c  and reopen and paste them there
or the Format=Flowed "feechur" will reflow any quoted lines
which end with a trailing space at my maximal line size.

To show you the effect of this I will let  Format=Flowed
do its thing.   ; )

FYI

Robert Aldwinckle
---

> the lines of text I sent are all over the
> place and not as they appear when I first post.  At present, I have
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Thank you
> Kate
PA Bear [MS MVP] - 15 May 2008 08:33 GMT
Looks fine to me in this reply, Kate, but then I have OE set to wrap at 76.

> I have noticed that, on my computer, when I post to an NG and my post
> is repeated in the reply, the lines of text I sent are all over the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Thank you
> Kate
Kate - 15 May 2008 13:48 GMT
> Looks fine to me in this reply, Kate, but then I have OE set to wrap
> at 76.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>> Thank you
>> Kate

Interestingly, my quoted post is showing as in the original in all of
your replies, with a slight hiccup in Robert`s.  However, now that I
am replying, my quoted first post has failed to wrap properly -
possibly to do with the >> in front of the lines, as Michael
mentioned?  I see from Tools/Options/Send that my posts are set in
MIME format, with no encoding, but have now changed to Uuencode to see
if that makes a difference.  It is only a very minor thing, I know,
but has been niggling me for a long time.

Bruce : I have always made sure that my screen res is in the same
ratio as my monitor, in particular to avoid distortion of photos and
graphics.  Thank you for the reminder, though...

...and thank you all for your advice.

Kate
PA Bear [MS MVP] - 15 May 2008 17:04 GMT
>>> I have noticed that, on my computer, when I post to an NG and my
>>> post
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> possibly to do with the >> in front of the lines, as Michael
> mentioned?...

Quoting of quoting [think about it] has always been like that, especially it
seems if one of the posters is using OE-QuoteFix (like I am).  Nothing to
worry about IMHO.
Signature

~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002
AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net
DTS-L http://dts-l.net/

Kate - 15 May 2008 18:55 GMT
>>>> I have noticed that, on my computer, when I post to an NG and my
>>>> post
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> it seems if one of the posters is using OE-QuoteFix (like I am).  Nothing
> to worry about IMHO.

I know there are very much worse things that can happen in OE, and if this
is all that I have to put up with, I should count myself blessed!   It`s
just that I do not notice it in other people`s threads and wondered why it
happened in mine.  Oh well...

(Hmm, since I changed the setting to Uuencode, I see that this time my
double-indented post hasn`t changed.)

Thanks
Kate
íÁÒÉÑ - 24 May 2008 12:49 GMT
>>>>> I have noticed that, on my computer, when I post to an NG and my
>>>>> post
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> Thanks
> Kate
éÇÏÒØ äÁÎÉÌÏ× - 30 May 2008 07:03 GMT
>>>>>> I have noticed that, on my computer, when I post to an NG and my
>>>>>> post
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>> Thanks
>> Kate
Robert Aldwinckle - 16 May 2008 05:02 GMT
> [X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original]

...
> Interestingly, my quoted post is showing as in the original in all of
> your replies, with a slight hiccup in Robert`s.

Whatever it is you're seeing was probably just me editing
to reformat where I inserted a comment.  ; )

>  However, now that I
> am replying, my quoted first post has failed to wrap properly -
> possibly to do with the >> in front of the lines, as Michael
> mentioned?

All of your lines are terminated without a trailing space
which suggests that you are doing your own formatting
which defeats the  Format=Flowed  feature you are using.
Essentially, each of your lines is treated as a paragraph;
so if someone else wants to quote it and their linesize
is smaller than yours (or the quote characters cause your
lines to grow bigger than theirs) each of your lines have to be
written as two lines, independently of any other of your lines
being quoted.

> I see from Tools/Options/Send that my posts are set in
> MIME format, with no encoding, but have now changed to Uuencode to see
> if that makes a difference.  It is only a very minor thing, I know,
> but has been niggling me for a long time.

If you don't mind the arbitrary chopping of your sentences
into lines by your linesize try to get into the habit of writing
paragraphs.  Then your sentences will be chopped into lines
with a trailing space, so then when someone who is using
Format=Flowed quotes you, your paragraphs (or sets of lines
from one) can also be reformatted (once the quoter saves or posts.)

And BTW if you ever have to start re-editing a message
from Drafts or the Outbox you may still have to open your
composition window maximized and reflow the paragraph.
(I'm not sure how well  Format=Flowed recovers from that
though.  I suppose it would be nice not to have to worry
about line size after restarting from Drafts.   Certainly without
Format=Flowed you do have to have that concern or risk
the embarrassment of posting malformed paragraphs.

Good luck

Robert
---

> Bruce : I have always made sure that my screen res is in the same
> ratio as my monitor, in particular to avoid distortion of photos and
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Kate
Kate - 16 May 2008 15:12 GMT
>> [X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original]
> ...
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
> Robert
> ---

When I type a post, I let the computer "carriage return"
automatically* and I thought that I did paragraph properly.  However,
I have just noticed that my compose window was not fully-maximised -
stretched to almost fill the screen, but not maximised.  Maybe that
hasn`t helped, although it can only be two or three characters short.
Also, I see that when I compose or reply to a post, the default font
for Plain Text in NGs seems to be Times New Roman.  But, if I select
Read All Message in Plain Text, they come up in 9pt Arial, which is
the default font for Mail and News in Tools/Options/Compose.  Would
that make a difference?

I have looked in Tools/Options in the main Menu, and also under Format
in the compose window, but cannot find a check box for Format=Flowed.
Could you tell me where to find it, please?

Anyway, I have now reduced my line length to 70 characters, maximised
the compose Window, and selected Uuencode.  If that doesn`t work,
well, I give up!

Thank you for all the info
Kate

*I used to be a secretary in ye olden days when you had to wait for
the `ting` when the typewriter carriage reached the righthand margin
and then slam the carriage back.  Such bliss not to have to do that
with a computer,especially when it was a long carriage that would take
brief size paper :-)
Robert Aldwinckle - 16 May 2008 21:10 GMT
> When I type a post, I let the computer "carriage return"
> automatically* and I thought that I did paragraph properly.  However,
> I have just noticed that my compose window was not fully-maximised -
> stretched to almost fill the screen, but not maximised.  Maybe that
> hasn`t helped, although it can only be two or three characters short.

If you already have your normal mode window maximally sized
you won't get any of the benefit of maximizing it.   The point is
that once lines are chopped to your line size the parargraphs
they are a part of will stop wrapping in the window and just
show you the lines of the formatted paragraph.  If you continue
editing the already formatted lines you could create some which
are too long (in which case when you save or send them they
will be chopped) or shorter than your line size (which will not
be combined with what follows unless you make it flow in your
composition window.)  It's in order to see if you have to do
some extra edits to make already formatted text flow that I make
the suggestion of maximizing the composition window.

> Also, I see that when I compose or reply to a post, the default font
> for Plain Text in NGs seems to be Times New Roman.  But, if I select
> Read All Message in Plain Text, they come up in 9pt Arial, which is
> the default font for Mail and News in Tools/Options/Compose.  Would
> that make a difference?

Not really.   You might notice a difference in formatting with them
but it would only be due to a difference in proportional spacing
between the two fonts.

> I have looked in Tools/Options in the main Menu, and also under Format
> in the compose window, but cannot find a check box for Format=Flowed.
> Could you tell me where to find it, please?

Unfortunately, it is an undocumented default from a certain level of maintenance.
However, you may find a registry hack which could be used to disable it.

> Anyway, I have now reduced my line length to 70 characters, maximised the compose Window, and selected Uuencode.  If that doesn`t
> work, well, I give up!

In that case, if you are really flowing paragraphs then something has changed
in OE that I wasn't aware of which breaks the Format=Flowed feature.
AFAIK you must have those trailing spaces on any lines which are to be
flowable otherwise as I said each line may be treated as a separate paragraph.

Just to check that that still works as I understand it I have added spaces
after the last words in the preceding paragraph.   Let's see what happens
when I send it to the Outbox...

QED.   Reflowed to fit *my* line size (132) but only seen that way *after*
the message is in the Outbox.   This comment was added from the Outbox.

> Thank you for all the info
> Kate
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> with a computer,especially when it was a long carriage that would take
> brief size paper :-)

You mean you missed working with CRTs and their line editing too?  <eg>

Robert
---
Kate - 16 May 2008 23:44 GMT
>> When I type a post, I let the computer "carriage return"
>> automatically* and I thought that I did paragraph properly.
[quoted text clipped - 81 lines]
> Robert
> ---

Could you explain "trailing spaces", please?  Does it mean that each
line should end with a space?  If so, I would have to watch where the
cursor is and hit Enter after a space and before the line
automatically wraps.  Is that correct?

The most advanced method of producing copy that I ever used at work
was recording on to a floppy disc.  It really was floppy, too, not
sandwiched between two bits of stiff plastic. There was a screen but
it was like an MS DOS window -  white on black.  It wasn`t very good
and I don`t think it caught on.  I certainly didn`t like it.  Another
machine used magnetic tape but you still had to use paper in the
typewriter, or you couldn`t see what you had typed.  You then put
another sheet of paper in the same machine and printed it again from
the tape!  Unsurprisingly, that didn`t do well, either.

[After putting this in the Outbox, I opened it again and my new
settings have made things worse. Even some paragraphs in your reply
are being chopped up.  Something else I noticed : in the compose
window, under Format>Encoding, the setting is Western European (ISO).
Should I try changing that to Western European (Windows), do you
think?]

Kate
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.