>Do you know about
>something similar at the XP or Vista world?
Vista and XP already have such a system in place, as have any Windows
OS after 3.1, but it's not real RAM, it's a system for swapping out
pages of RAM to disk that are not needed at the moment so you can load
in pages of RAM that are. It would be really hard for the host OS to
know what pages in the VM that would not be needed, so something on
top of the host OS in VPC would have to take care of that, adding yet
another layer of virtual memory. So it would be 3 layers, the host,
VPC the app, and then the OS inside the VM and they pretty much fight
each other for resources.
VPC doesn't allow any of it's allocated RAM to be swapped out to disk
though, and it has to allocate real RAM when it starts up, and I
believe the reasons for this is separation of the virtual Machine from
anything the host OS might do with its RAM, and for performance
reasons.
This is all an educated guess on my part, as I really don't know how a
memory overcommit would work with something like VPC, so take it with
a grain of salt, but I do know overcommit on top of virtual memory, is
much, much, slower than having enough RAM to begin with.

Signature
Bob Comer
>Thanks for your answer ;)
>
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
>> >but it will no use the memory, just need that the system report at least
>> >1.4gb minimun...
Vincent - 24 Feb 2008 14:48 GMT
Thanks
Robert Comer <bobcomer-removeme-@mindspring.com> escribió en el mensaje de
noticias acq2s3he4mu7se33fjcpfehrh097tl00f5@4ax.com...
> >Do you know about
> >something similar at the XP or Vista world?
[quoted text clipped - 68 lines]
> >> >but it will no use the memory, just need that the system report at least
> >> >1.4gb minimun...
Robert Comer - 24 Feb 2008 15:23 GMT
No problem.

Signature
Bob Comer
>Thanks
>
[quoted text clipped - 83 lines]
>least
>> >> >1.4gb minimun...