> Does anyone from Microsoft review these groups?
Microsoft people visit sometimes and post occasionally...
> If so does anyne know when dual monitor support is
> going to be added to Virtual PC/Server?
Almost certainly never, due to the emulated S3 Trio graphics card...

Signature
Mark Rae
ASP.NET MVP
http://www.markrae.net
DevilsPGD - 28 Jul 2008 19:12 GMT
>> Does anyone from Microsoft review these groups?
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Almost certainly never, due to the emulated S3 Trio graphics card...
In the real world, you could toss in two S3 Trio graphics cards and get
multi-monitor support, this worked as far back as the 98 product line.
I'm having trouble imagining any business case for adding this
functionality to VPC though, and would imagine you'd be more likely to
convince VMWare to do it since they are more open to experimental
features, and there is an actual profit center behind the product.
Steve Jain - 28 Jul 2008 19:28 GMT
>>> Does anyone from Microsoft review these groups?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>convince VMWare to do it since they are more open to experimental
>features, and there is an actual profit center behind the product.
VM Ware 6 WKS does have experimental dual monitor support.

Signature
Cheers,
Steve Jain, Virtual Machine MVP
http://vpc.essjae.com/
I do not work for Microsoft.
Steve Jain - 28 Jul 2008 19:29 GMT
>>>> Does anyone from Microsoft review these groups?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
>VM Ware 6 WKS does have experimental dual monitor support.
Correction, I don't think it's experimental anymore, just a regular
feature.

Signature
Cheers,
Steve Jain, Virtual Machine MVP
http://vpc.essjae.com/
I do not work for Microsoft.
DevilsPGD - 29 Jul 2008 21:06 GMT
>>>>> Does anyone from Microsoft review these groups?
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>>
>>VM Ware 6 WKS does have experimental dual monitor support.
Yeah, I was trying to be more subtle then just saying "go buy another
vendor's product"
>Correction, I don't think it's experimental anymore, just a regular
>feature.
Looks like it's not flagged as experimental anymore either.