> I wouldn't suggest it. Who knows what you'd get with it.
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> >>
> >> It appears that the trial is no longer available though.
yes, it will. I miss XP x64 - I was a very early adopter, after all. <G>
But I've moved to Vista, kicking and screaming. And hoping they change some
behaviours for the better in the next version.

Signature
Charlie.
http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
> Yeah, those torrents are kinda risky and - like it or not - Vista is the
> way
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>> >>
>> >> It appears that the trial is no longer available though.
Tony Sperling - 27 May 2008 01:45 GMT
Not to object with this particular issue, but do not forget to remember that
'Torrents' are probably the best Idea ever implemented in software. In terms
of cost-effective distribution, there can be nothing to measure up, and much
honest and decent work is to be had only via Torrents. When you subscribe to
an Internet account, it should come with the immortal words of Dante - "All
who enter here, release all hope!" and the same goes for the 'first timer'
that subscribes to this here group!!!
You just never can tell until the time when you can!
The fact that torrents are so valuable also makes it the ideal distribution
channel for suspicious stuff, but this is nothing extra-ordinary. This is
just mirroring how Interent is set up to work!
Tony. . .
Carlos - 27 May 2008 02:00 GMT
There are both "good" and "bad" bit-torrents.
I wonder which of these are "legal" xp x64's
http://torrent-finder.com/
search for "Windows XP x64 Pro"
Wasn't MSFT distributing (or going to) distribute software via Torrents?
Is the red wine Malbec taking a toll on my memory?
:)
Carlos
Tony Sperling - 27 May 2008 02:27 GMT
The link 'links' to at least 30 distributions - a lot of those I would
regard as 'suspicious'. You have to try them out to really form a good idea.
I don't know, it just seem that MS has a way of automatically putting
'Torrents' on the blacklist. That's allright too, but that means everything
is going to be on that list, as I see it.
There is one OEM edition that could turn out to be O.K. - I wouldn't
hesitate to try it if I didn't have one installed as it is.
That MS would put any edition on the Torrents, I would regard as unlikely.
But you may be right - I just haven't heard that. I will certainly keep my
eyes open now!
And - thanks, for that link! Most any link is allways welcome!!!
Tony. . .
> There are both "good" and "bad" bit-torrents.
> I wonder which of these are "legal" xp x64's
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> :)
> Carlos
Charlie Russel - MVP - 27 May 2008 06:10 GMT
I don't disagree, but am reminded of the adage - caveat emptor.

Signature
Charlie.
http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
> Not to object with this particular issue, but do not forget to remember
> that
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Tony. . .
Dominick - 27 May 2008 11:49 GMT
> yes, it will. I miss XP x64 - I was a very early adopter, after all. <G>
> But I've moved to Vista, kicking and screaming. And hoping they change
> some behaviours for the better in the next version.
I too was a very early XP x64, but I bought a new Vista x64 system,
reinstalled Windows Server 2008 on it and re-configured it as a
workstation, and I have never looked back. It is awesome and IMHO so
much better/faster/more reliable than XP x64 or Vista!