>But I don't want a new computer. I like my Windows 95 machine.
In my case, it is Win98 that I like. But my remark was not aimed at
the software but at the hardware. If your machine is running Win95, it
is probably from the era before 1998, which means it is more than five
years old. If the motherboard is going, soon the harddisk will also
go, and maybe the floppy drive. You can replace all of these but the
cost in time as well as money is not insignificant.
You could put Win98SE on a wide variety of hardware.
>Maybe someday
>I might install Windows 98 but I have absolutely no intentions of going to XP.
>It's too bloated with "features" I don't want and it has so many security flaws
>that it would take me several days just to download all the critical updates.
>Ever since XP came out it seems as though Microsoft has had to issue critical
>updates for it at least once a week, sometimes even twice a week.
You can tell WinXP to look more-pr-less like Win95-98 and you don't
have to use features that you do not want.
I think you misinterpret the "security flaws". The actual flaws were
repaired long ago. The fixes that are coming out almost weekly are
needed because hackers are trying to invade the system. Each week
someone somewhere thinks of a new attack and so each week Microsoft
produces a new protection. No one is attacking Win95 because they view
it as obsolete.
Bill Starbuck (MVP)