Windows Forum / Windows 95 / July 2008
Windows 95 and 98 on same PC?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
rpgs rock dvds - 04 May 2008 11:55 GMT Is it possible to have a PC (that has one HDD) which allows you to 'dual-boot' to either Windows 95 or Windows 98?
The reason I ask is that I don't seem to be able to get an old 3dfx voodoo1 card to work using Windows 98SE. The latest driver that appears to be available to Win9x users for the voodoo1 card is a Direct X 5 version. As Windows 98SE ships with Direct X 6, (and then gets updated to Direct X 9 when I install my primary graphics card driver package), I don't think I have a suitable system to use this card.
When I run dxdiag or a 3dfx game, I get serious problems such as the screen goes all weird looking and I then need to reboot.
Perhaps I'd have more luck with the voodoo1 card if I was using an operating system that had Direct X version 5, such as Windows 95?
Thanks for any advice, Best regards, Robert.
John John (MVP) - 04 May 2008 13:26 GMT Hmmm. If you can't get the card to work with Windows 98SE then what is the use of having a dual boot at all on the computer? What's the use of the Windows 98 installation if it can't use the video card?
Yes, you can dual boot between Windows 95 and Windows 98 but it takes a bit of "tinkering" to get it to work properly. You need two separate partitions to do this properly and you have to boot one of the installations with a floppy diskette or you have to change the msdos.sys file when booting from one installation to the next. The easiest way to do this is no doubt to use a third party boot manager like BootItNG or XOSL.
http://www.computerhope.com/issues/ch000346.htm http://thpc.info/dual/dualboots.html http://www.terabyteunlimited.com/bootit-next-generation.htm http://www.ranish.com/part/
John
> Is it possible to have a PC (that has one HDD) which allows you to > 'dual-boot' to either Windows 95 or Windows 98? [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Thanks for any advice, Best regards, Robert. rpgs rock dvds - 05 May 2008 17:09 GMT > Hmmm. If you can't get the card to work with Windows 98SE then what is > the use of having a dual boot at all on the computer? What's the use of [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Thanks for those links. I think I might buy BootIt. I'm thinking of having a 95/98/XP system. But do you know if I can also have MS-DOS 6.22 as well? (I have old legacy Creative Soundblaster software that fails to install/run on DOS versions 7 and above. Being able to very occasionally boot into DOS 6.22 might be handy -- perhaps I could create a new 'old-style' FAT partition on my HDD which DOS would recognise.)
Thanks, regards, Robert.
John John (MVP) - 05 May 2008 21:19 GMT > Thanks for those links. I think I might buy BootIt. I'm thinking of > having a 95/98/XP system. But do you know if I can also have MS-DOS [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Thanks, regards, Robert. Yes, you can boot all of these with BootItNg, it would be the easiest way to accomplish this. You can also boot all of these with the XP/NT (ntldr) boot loader but there is a problem booting more than one W9x operating system with the XP boot loader, it would be better to use a third party boot manager if you want to boot more than one W9x version. You may also find this useful: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/306559
John
rpgs rock dvds - 06 May 2008 08:15 GMT > > Thanks for those links. I think I might buy BootIt. I'm thinking of > > having a 95/98/XP system. But do you know if I can also have MS-DOS [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > John THanks.
>> If you can't get the card to work with Windows 98SE then what is the use of having a dual boot at all on the computer? What's the use of the Windows 98 installation if it can't use the video card? I was thinking of having this situation -
Dual-boot 95 and 98.
95 = uses the graphics card (it's actually a 3D accellerator), and runs DirectX 5 driver. (There's nothing else available.)
98 = install the 3D accellerator, but simply don't use it. Continue to use primary graphics card in AGP slot and don't run any 3D accellerated software.
I think that would work ok.
Best regards, Robert.
Claudehl@aol.com - 12 May 2008 21:33 GMT You could, but keep in mind that normally you can't have more than 4 [primary + extended] partitions, so if you use one partition per OS (DOS/95/98/XP), you'll use up 4 primary partitions and won't be able to create an extended partition.
Having an extended partition with some logical drives in it is very useful when you have multiple OSes in separate partitions, you can store your own files there and they will be accessible, no matter which OS you boot into (at least one logical drive will have to be FAT if you want to access it from DOS 6.22).
I think BootIt Next Generation allows you to overcome that 4 partitions limitation.
Claude
> Thanks for those links. �I think I might buy BootIt. �I'm thinking of > having a 95/98/XP system. �But do you know if I can also have MS-DOS [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Thanks, regards, Robert. rpgs rock dvds - 18 May 2008 14:38 GMT On 12 May, 21:33, Claud...@aol.com wrote:
> You could, but keep in mind that normally you can't have more than 4 > [primary + extended] partitions, so if you use one partition per OS [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Thanks very much for the info -- I am in fact going to purchase BootIt NG. Best regards, Robert.
J. P. Gilliver - 04 Jul 2008 16:59 GMT []
> Thanks for those links. I think I might buy BootIt. I'm thinking of > having a 95/98/XP system. But do you know if I can also have MS-DOS > 6.22 as well? (I have old legacy Creative Soundblaster software that I was going to say why not just boot into DOS ...
> fails to install/run on DOS versions 7 and above. Being able to very ... until you said that. What exactly happens when you do try to install it? (And what does this software do that you actually want, that the W9x software/drivers/whatever doesn't do - or are you just wanting it for completeness as it were?) []
 Signature J. P. Gilliver | Tel. +44 1634 203298
thanatoid - 05 May 2008 20:22 GMT rpgs rock dvds <rpgsrockdvds@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in news:46c8c39e-6320-49f2-abea-a845836ddbd1@l64g2000hse.googlegr oups.com:
> Is it possible to have a PC (that has one HDD) which allows > you to 'dual-boot' to either Windows 95 or Windows 98? [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > Thanks for any advice, Best regards, Robert. Since Win95B/C is almost the same as 98 except for USB support and the stupid IE/Active desktop integration (which can be disabled using customizers such as that found at http://www.litepc.com - an IE remover is on the free page), it seems a little silly to run both.
AFAIK, any DirectX version can be removed and replaced with an earlier one - in fact EVERY new DirectX version comes with a variety of scary warnings about how "some things might not work any more" (good ol' Microsoft).
Vers. 6-9c can be found at http://www.oldversion.com/program.php?n=directx
It is possible you might be able to find ver 5 somewhere else, or just istall THAT component from the 95 disc to win98SE after removing ver. 6.
OTOH, a new (or used - we are on Direct X ver 10 now!) video card which would handle a later version of DirectX wouldn't cost much either. Like maybe 3-15 dollars in a small computer shop or eBay.
Summing it up, while I can /kind of/ see someone wanting to run 98 and XP (or Windows and Linux) on the same machine, running 95 AND 98 seems kind of insane, no offense :-)
 Signature There is no doubt that life is given us, not to be enjoyed, but to be overcome--to be got over.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
rpgs rock dvds - 06 May 2008 08:11 GMT > rpgs rock dvds <rpgsrockd...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote innews:46c8c39e-6320-49f2-abea-a845836ddbd1@l64g2000hse.googlegr > oups.com: [quoted text clipped - 53 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Thanks for reply. Please note I need to run software (drivers) that use DirectX 5, and also I do have lots of other software that would benefit from higher versions of DirectX, such as versions 6 to 9. So my requirement appears to be for both DirectX 5 and DirectX 6-9 "at the same time". Therefore I think that having both '95 and '98 (on the same PC) seems like a reasonable idea.
Best regards, Robert.
glee - 11 May 2008 04:10 GMT Just changing the topic a little.....why do you think you need to have no newer version of DirectX installed than v.5, in order to install the correct driver for your 3dfx voodoo card? It really does not matter that the driver package comes with DX5....voodoo drivers should operate fine with DirectX 9 installed.
I have a Phoenix Maxi Gamer AGP card installed on a 98SE system with DirectX 9.0c. The card is Voodoo Banshee based, and the last drivers available were for Win95/98 and DirectX 7.0
Exactly what card do you have, what drivers have you installed and from where did you get them?
 Signature Glen Ventura, MS MVP Windows, A+ http://dts-l.net/ http://dts-l.net/goodpost.htm
> Is it possible to have a PC (that has one HDD) which allows you to > 'dual-boot' to either Windows 95 or Windows 98? [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Thanks for any advice, Best regards, Robert. rpgs rock dvds - 18 May 2008 14:38 GMT > Just changing the topic a little.....why do you think you need to have no newer > version of DirectX installed than v.5, in order to install the correct driver for [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > > - Show quoted text - That's really interesting, because I've just this moment got the voodoo 1 card working for the very first time since I got it, and I installed Windows 95, and made sure DirectX version 5 was on, and it all seems to work.
I have a Diamond voodoo1 card. The driver available for it is directx 5. I think your banshee works because the driver it expects is directx version 7. Directx version 9 is very similar in API-style to version 7, which is why they are kind of interchangeable in this regard. Not so for directx version 5 drivers, which is why I couldn't get my voodoo1 card to work under directx version 9.
I got the driver from falconfyl de website. They were the official diamond voodoo 1 drivers. I installed the starter driver package, then updated them to the latest official diamond drivers. It works reasonably well - a few graphical glitches here and there. But beforehand when I was using windows 98 with directx 6, then 7, then 9, nothing worked at all - very nasty crashes, etc.
Best regards, Robert.
|
|
|