We currently have a Peer-to-Peer LAN with Win98 machines. Would there be
any benefit to changing to a Client/Server configuration with Windows Server
2003 ? My boss is interested in increasing the performance of the LAN.
Internal security is not an issue.
Thanks in advance
Bobbie
James Egan - 22 Oct 2004 18:03 GMT
>We currently have a Peer-to-Peer LAN with Win98 machines. Would there be
>any benefit to changing to a Client/Server configuration with Windows Server
>2003 ? My boss is interested in increasing the performance of the LAN.
>Internal security is not an issue.
In that case probably not. What is the speed of the LAN? You can maybe
speed things up a bit by upgrading some of that kit. eg. 100Mb instead
of 10Mb and/or switch instead of hub.
Jim.
Haggis - 22 Oct 2004 19:21 GMT
>>We currently have a Peer-to-Peer LAN with Win98 machines. Would there be
>>any benefit to changing to a Client/Server configuration with Windows
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Jim.
I agree, go to 100mb if you can and (my opinion) keep the file sharing using
NetBeui (its faster than TCP/IP)
Alphonse - 22 Oct 2004 19:49 GMT
But no security as can be with TCP/IP...
>>>We currently have a Peer-to-Peer LAN with Win98 machines. Would there be
>>>any benefit to changing to a Client/Server configuration with Windows
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> I agree, go to 100mb if you can and (my opinion) keep the file sharing
> using NetBeui (its faster than TCP/IP)
Bobbie - 26 Oct 2004 13:50 GMT
Thanks for the replies. We definitely don't have the expertise in-house to
setup a Client/Server network. Good to know we can improve performance with
hardware upgrades while we work on getting more versed in the Client/Server
option.
Bobbie
> We currently have a Peer-to-Peer LAN with Win98 machines. Would there be
> any benefit to changing to a Client/Server configuration with Windows Server
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Thanks in advance
> Bobbie