Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsWindows VistaWindows XPWindows MeWindows 98Windows 95Virtual PCInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressWindows MediaSecurity
Related Topics
MS Server ProductsMS OfficePC HardwareMore Topics ...

Windows Forum / Windows 98 / Networking / November 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

DSL router and network

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
M Mordkovych - 07 Nov 2005 23:19 GMT
How can I connect two Win98 machines to DSL and to each other? What are my
options i. e. routers etc?

TIA MM
CJT - 07 Nov 2005 23:58 GMT
> How can I connect two Win98 machines to DSL and to each other? What are my
> options i. e. routers etc?
>
> TIA MM

The three possibilities (at least, the three I can think of):

1) Contract with your ISP for two external IP addresses -- not generally
recommended , because unnecessarily expensive -- probably will also
require a (cheap) switch for LAN traffic;

2) Microsoft Internet Connection Sharing (ICS) software -- I think
it's a bad idea because people often have trouble with it, and it
requires that your portal machine be powered on for the secondary
machine to connect to the Internet -- also requires two network
interfaces in the portal machine;

3) Your choice of router -- that's what I would do -- inexpensive,
flexible, and can contribute to security.

HTH. JMHO.

Signature

The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to
minimize spam.  Our true address is of the form che...@prodigy.net.

M Mordkovych - 08 Nov 2005 05:52 GMT
Thanks for reply.

What kind of router has options of both DSL and regular network?

> 3) Your choice of router -- that's what I would do -- inexpensive,
> flexible, and can contribute to security.
CJT - 08 Nov 2005 06:41 GMT
> Thanks for reply.
>
> What kind of router has options of both DSL and regular network?

Most of them do these days.

>>3) Your choice of router -- that's what I would do -- inexpensive,
>>flexible, and can contribute to security.

Signature

The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to
minimize spam.  Our true address is of the form che...@prodigy.net.

M Mordkovych - 08 Nov 2005 18:25 GMT
I checked in the routers descriptions and dont see where say that.
What options should I look for?

> > Thanks for reply.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> >>3) Your choice of router -- that's what I would do -- inexpensive,
> >>flexible, and can contribute to security.
CJT - 08 Nov 2005 21:43 GMT
> I checked in the routers descriptions and dont see where say that.
> What options should I look for?

Typically a router suitable for use with DSL will have "broadband"
in its name (if it doesn't explicitly say "DSL").  Realize, though,
that some of the DSL "modems" now being provided to new DSL
subscribers include routers built-in, so you might already HAVE a
router.

The LAN side will typically show up on the box as "4-port" (or
however many) -- that's your signal that there's a switch built-in.
Of course, you can construct your own system using a single port
router and a switch (or hub, but hubs seem to be less common every
day).  But I suspect most people buy the combined item for
convenience.

>>>Thanks for reply.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>>>>3) Your choice of router -- that's what I would do -- inexpensive,
>>>>flexible, and can contribute to security.

Signature

The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to
minimize spam.  Our true address is of the form che...@prodigy.net.

Ron Martell - 08 Nov 2005 22:15 GMT
>Thanks for reply.
>
>What kind of router has options of both DSL and regular network?

All that is required is that your DSL modem have an ethernet connector
for connecting to the computer.   Some DSL modems connect to the
computer via USB and not ethernet and this rules out most of the
routers currently available.

The router (D-Link, Linksys, Belkin, and SMC are some common brand
names that most computer stores will stock) should have 5 ethernet
connectors - 4 LAN ports for connecting to computers and one WAN
(=broadband, cable, DSL) for connecting to the modem.

Good luck

Ron Martell     Duncan B.C.    Canada
Signature

Microsoft MVP
On-Line Help Computer Service
http://onlinehelp.bc.ca

In memory of a dear friend Alex Nichol MVP
http://aumha.org/alex.htm

M Mordkovych - 11 Nov 2005 17:01 GMT
Thanks for reply!
One more question : after buying the router - where can I find instructions
for setting up the network? Remember it's 2 Win98 boxes.

TIA

> >Thanks for reply.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Ron Martell     Duncan B.C.    Canada
Ron Martell - 12 Nov 2005 05:28 GMT
>Thanks for reply!
>One more question : after buying the router - where can I find instructions
>for setting up the network? Remember it's 2 Win98 boxes.

The basic instructions should be included in the documentation that
comes with the router.

Here are some web sites with additional information on basic
networking:
http://www.sohointer.net/
http://www.practicallynetworked.com
http://www.wown.info/j_helmig/guide.htm

Good luck

Ron Martell     Duncan B.C.    Canada
Signature

Microsoft MVP (1997 - 2006)
On-Line Help Computer Service
http://onlinehelp.bc.ca

M Mordkovych - 11 Nov 2005 19:25 GMT
Thanks for reply,

For example this one - is it good for my purposes?

TRENDware TRENDnet ADSL Firewall Router Model TW100BRM504

http://www.pricegrabber.com/search_techspecs_full.php/masterid=3027874

Another question is there routers which have both wire and wireless
connectons?

> All that is required is that your DSL modem have an ethernet connector
> for connecting to the computer.   Some DSL modems connect to the
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Ron Martell     Duncan B.C.    Canada
Ron Martell - 12 Nov 2005 05:26 GMT
>Thanks for reply,
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>Another question is there routers which have both wire and wireless
>connectons?

Yes, most wireless routers also have 4 wired connections included. And
you can increase the wired connections by using switches.  If you
connected 8 port switches to each of the 4 wired connetions on the
router you could then have 28 PCs connected to the router.

Ron Martell     Duncan B.C.    Canada
Signature

Microsoft MVP (1997 - 2006)
On-Line Help Computer Service
http://onlinehelp.bc.ca

M Mordkovych - 13 Nov 2005 14:22 GMT
Hi!

1) So I dont understand - why do I need 5 ports?
2) 8x4 = 32 so why 28 PC's?

Regards,
MM

> Yes, most wireless routers also have 4 wired connections included. And
> you can increase the wired connections by using switches.  If you
> connected 8 port switches to each of the 4 wired connetions on the
> router you could then have 28 PCs connected to the router.
>
> Ron Martell     Duncan B.C.    Canada
Richard G. Harper - 14 Nov 2005 01:33 GMT
One port is needed for the uplink on each switch.  :-)

Signature

Richard G. Harper [MVP Shell/User]  rgharper@gmail.com
* PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups
* for the benefit of all.  Private mail is usually not replied to.
* My website, such as it is ... http://rgharper.mvps.org/
* HELP us help YOU ... http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm

> Hi!
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>>
>> Ron Martell     Duncan B.C.    Canada
Ron Martell - 14 Nov 2005 20:27 GMT
>Hi!
>
>1) So I dont understand - why do I need 5 ports?

You may not need them, but they are included as part of the standard
design.  Most people have at least one wired PC connected to their
routers, because wired connections are faster than wireless and
because the router is usually located very near to at least one of
PCs.

>2) 8x4 = 32 so why 28 PC's?

One port on each switch would be used to connect to the router,
leaving 7 for PCs.

Ron Martell     Duncan B.C.    Canada
Signature

Microsoft MVP (1997 - 2006)
On-Line Help Computer Service
http://onlinehelp.bc.ca

M Mordkovych - 15 Nov 2005 00:54 GMT
Thanks for reply!

I am trying to make choice between the pruducts.
I couldnt understand difference - what is better for me :

http://www.linksys.com/servlet/Satellite?childpagename=US%2FLayout&packedargs=c%
3DL_Product_C1%26cid%3D1115416939789&pagename=Linksys%2FCommon%2FVisitor

Wrapper
M Mordkovych - 15 Nov 2005 21:19 GMT
D-link also has a whole line :
http://www.dlink.com/products/category.asp?cid=4&sec=3

How to distingish between them?

> Thanks for reply!
>
> I am trying to make choice between the pruducts.
> I couldnt understand difference - what is better for me :

http://www.linksys.com/servlet/Satellite?childpagename=US%2FLayout&packedargs=c%
3DL_Product_C1%26cid%3D1115416939789&pagename=Linksys%2FCommon%2FVisitor

> Wrapper
Ron Martell - 16 Nov 2005 04:24 GMT
>D-link also has a whole line :
>http://www.dlink.com/products/category.asp?cid=4&sec=3
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>http://www.linksys.com/servlet/Satellite?childpagename=US%2FLayout&packedargs=c%
3DL_Product_C1%26cid%3D1115416939789&pagename=Linksys%2FCommon%2FVisitor

>> Wrapper

Decide what you need and what you don't need.

For example, the biggest differences between most of the various
models is on the wireless side.   If you don't have a current or
anticipated future need for wireless networking then you can eliminate
all of the wireless models, reducing the number of candidates
considerably, and probably saving a bit of money as well.

As for D-Link versus Linksys I do not think there is any substantive
difference in quality or performance between the two brands, although
you will find persons who are ardent adherents of one brand or the
other and who will often have a horror story to relate regarding the
other brand.

For example, on the wired only routers section at D-Link
http://www.dlink.com/products/category.asp?cid=2&sec=3 there are 5
models to choose from.

The model DI-604 would probably the cheapest and would be fully
adequate for everything you have mentioned so far.

The model DI-704P is pretty much identical to the DI-604 except that
it has a parallel printer port build into the router.  This means that
you could connect a printer to the router's printer port and access
that printer from any computer on the network.  Normally in a home
network a shared printer is connected to one of the computers and if
another computer wants to use the printer then the computer the
printer is connected to must be booted up and logged in.  With the
DI704P this is not necessary.

The model DI-704UP is the same as the DI-704P except that it has a USB
port to which a USB printer can be connected.  Being as most new
printers today are USB only this is probably a more usable model than
the DI-704P for many people.

The model DI-707P is a high capacity version of the DI-704P in that it
has 7 LAN ports for computers rather than 4.

The model DI-LB604 is a specialized version of the DI-604.  The "load
balancing" feature is probably something that would only be of
interest to persons with a tremendously heavy load on their network
and I seriously doubt if any home user would get any benefit from this
feature.

Hope this is of some assistance.

Good luck

Ron Martell     Duncan B.C.    Canada
Signature

Microsoft MVP (1997 - 2006)
On-Line Help Computer Service
http://onlinehelp.bc.ca

M Mordkovych - 17 Nov 2005 18:36 GMT
Thanks for reply!

> The model DI-704UP is the same as the DI-704P except that it has a USB
> port to which a USB printer can be connected.  Being as most new
> printers today are USB only this is probably a more usable model than
> the DI-704P for many people.

I dont see any wireless router with USB port for printer, however. Is there
such a thing?

Thanks
Ron Martell - 19 Nov 2005 05:22 GMT
>I dont see any wireless router with USB port for printer, however. Is there
>such a thing?
>
>Thanks

Yes.  D-Link has one - model DI-704UP - as does SMC two - model
SMC2804WBRP-G

http://www.dlink.com/products/?sec=3&pid=272
http://www.smc.com/index.cfm?event=viewCategory&localeCode=EN_CAN&cid=1

I have yet to find a wireless router that also incorporated a print
server, but these are probably available as well.

Good luck

Ron Martell     Duncan B.C.    Canada
Signature

Microsoft MVP (1997 - 2006)
On-Line Help Computer Service
http://onlinehelp.bc.ca

M Mordkovych - 20 Nov 2005 04:51 GMT
Thanks!

Model SMC2804WBRP-G has USB 1.1 port so it's excluded.
D-Link guy said he cannot say for sure if my printer (Konica Mnolta 2400W)
is compatible with their server :

**As for your existing Konica 2400W, I couldn`t say for sure if our print
servers would be compatible. Ideally, D-Link Print Servers should work with
it, so long as your Konica is not an All In One or Multi-Function printer.
D-Link Print Servers ( wired or wireless ) will not operate with a
multi-function or all in one printers.**

Any other suggestons ?

> Yes.  D-Link has one - model DI-704UP - as does SMC two - model
> SMC2804WBRP-G
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I have yet to find a wireless router that also incorporated a print
> server, but these are probably available as well.
Ron Martell - 21 Nov 2005 21:47 GMT
>Thanks!
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Any other suggestons ?

No other suggestions for Router models although a Google web search
should find you some others if they are available.

As for the DI-704UP with multifunction printers, my experience is that
it will work, but for printer and fax sending functions only.   If you
want to use the other features (e.g. scanner) then it needs to be
connected to the PC.

I am investigating the possibility of using a USB printer autoswitch
(for sharing a USB printer automatically between two PCs) in
conjunction with an HP LaserJet 3030 and a D-Link DI-704UP.  One of
the USB inputs will be connected to a PC, the other to the router's
USB printer port.

Good luck

Ron Martell     Duncan B.C.    Canada
Signature

Microsoft MVP (1997 - 2006)
On-Line Help Computer Service
http://onlinehelp.bc.ca

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.