Hi,
I monitored the Swap file usage as suggested and it does indeed regularly
top 20 MB, in fact it often max's out at around 50MB. One thing I noticed
whilst doing this was that my processor frequently hits 100% - and not
necessarily when the swap file peaks. Is something that can be improved or
am I doomed to this?
Thanks
"Ron Martell" <ron.martell@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:g8ot229tk64njh9ftur93msas82arjd1ft@4ax.com...
> "Endulini" <fruit@orange.com> wrote:
>
> >Hi All,
> >
> >I'm looking to increase my memory and have come across the infamous error
> >that means Windows 98SE throws a wobbly when more than 512MB is
installed.
> >I've read the work-arounds but can anyone explain, do you still get the
> >benefit from having more than 512MB RAM? In my limited understand they
seem
> >to be fooling/forcing the PC to accept that it has no more than 512MB
> >installed therefore is there any point in having more?
> >
> >Thanks.
>
> Adding more memory can noticeably improve performance only if the
> added memory results in reduced usage of the virtual memory swap file.
> Therefore if the swap file is not currently being used to any
> significant extent then adding more memory will not provide a
> significant improvement.
>
> Before installing more RAM use the System Monitor utility that comes
> with Windows and use Edit - Add to set it to track "Memory manager:
> Swap file in use" for several days of normal to heavy usage. If "Swap
> file in use" regularly shows as 20 mb or more then the swap file is
> being used extensively and more memory would result in improved
> performance. Otherwise it is not likely to make any noticeable
> difference.
>
> This applies regardless of how much or how little RAM is currently
> installed in the computer.
>
> If you do go beyond 512 mb of RAM with Windows 95/98/Me then you need
> to add the following entry to the existing [vcache] section of the
> system.ini file:
>
> MaxFileCache=512000
>
> That limits the amount of memory that Windows can map for use as disk
> cache, thereby avoiding false "out of memory" errors that might
> otherwise result.
>
> It does not prevent Windows from using the full amount of the
> installed RAM for Windows components, application programs, device
> drivers, or data files.
>
> Note that there is no documented instance that I am aware of Windows
> 95/98/Me being successfully used on a computer with more than 1.5 gb
> of RAM installed unless the total RAM usage has been restricted by the
> use of a MaxPhysPage entry in the [386enh] section of system.ini
>
> Good luck
>
> Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada
Ron Martell - 17 May 2006 01:02 GMT
>Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>Thanks
When your Processor usage is at or near 100% go to the Processes tab
in Task Manager and click twice on the CPU column header. That will
sort the process list into descending order based on CPU usage. The
first few items on the list will show you what is taking up the CPU
time.
Good luck
Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada

Signature
Microsoft MVP (1997 - 2006)
On-Line Help Computer Service
http://onlinehelp.bc.ca
"Anyone who thinks that they are too small to make a difference
has never been in bed with a mosquito."
Ron Martell - 17 May 2006 01:05 GMT
>Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>necessarily when the swap file peaks. Is something that can be improved or
>am I doomed to this?
Cancel that last reply - it was an XP answer and is not relevant for
Windows 98.
Apologies.
Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada

Signature
Microsoft MVP (1997 - 2006)
On-Line Help Computer Service
http://onlinehelp.bc.ca
"Anyone who thinks that they are too small to make a difference
has never been in bed with a mosquito."
glee - 21 Jun 2006 12:35 GMT
> >Hi,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Apologies.
....but you *can* do much the same thing in Win98 with the free utility, Process
Explorer:
http://www.sysinternals.com/Utilities/ProcessExplorer.html

Signature
Glen Ventura, MS MVP Shell/User, A+
http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm