Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsWindows VistaWindows XPWindows MeWindows 98Windows 95Virtual PCInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressWindows MediaSecurity
Related Topics
MS Server ProductsMS OfficePC HardwareMore Topics ...

Windows Forum / Windows 98 / General Topics / December 2003

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

PDF files take forever to open - please help

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Adam - 24 Dec 2003 06:43 GMT
My system is running Win98SE.  And, I have the following installed:

- Adobe Acrobat v5.0
- Adobe FrameMaker v5.5
- Adobe PhotoDeluxe Business Edition v1.1

Whenever I try to open a PDF file, the initial Adobe Acrobat image opens and
seems to stay that way for minutes.  Anyone know what might be causing this problem?
Gary S. Terhune - 24 Dec 2003 07:13 GMT
What program is associated with PDF files? What program opens? Adobe Acrobat or
Acrobat Reader? If AcroReader, which version? You certainly don't want full
Acrobat opening just to read PDF files. That's like using Photoshop as an image
viewer. Those programs are editors, creation tools, and quite heavily laden.

Where are you opening them? In a browser (clicking on web links) or are these
locally stored files?

Maybe due to "Updating Online Components? Have you tried uninstalling and
reinstalling? How about trying AcroReader 6?

There are too many possible issues to go into here. Adobe products are
incredibly complex. I see that you have also posted to the Adobe groups, though
my reply will not appear there, probably. You're probably going to get better
answers there, though depending on your responses to the above, I might be able
to offer further suggestions. I find it endlessly, er, "entertaining" trying to
keep my Adobe products on their best behavior.

Signature

Gary S. Terhune
MS MVP for Windows 9x

*Recommended Help Sites*
http://www.dts-l.org
http://www.mvps.org
http://www.aumha.org

How to Use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups
http://support.microsoft.com/?pr=newswhelp
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

> My system is running Win98SE.  And, I have the following installed:
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Whenever I try to open a PDF file, the initial Adobe Acrobat image opens and
> seems to stay that way for minutes.  Anyone know what might be causing this problem?
Adam - 24 Dec 2003 08:14 GMT
> What program is associated with PDF files? What program opens? Adobe Acrobat or
> Acrobat Reader? If AcroReader, which version? You certainly don't want full
> Acrobat opening just to read PDF files. That's like using Photoshop as an image
> viewer. Those programs are editors, creation tools, and quite heavily laden.

PDF files are associated with the following:
"C:\Program Files\Adobe\Acrobat 5.0\Reader\AcroRd32.exe" "%1"

Adobe Reader v5.0 opens when PDF files are double clicked.

I only have Adobe Reader v5.0 installed but,
in Control Panel's "Add/Remove Programs",
it is listed as:

- Adobe Acrobat v5.0

Sorry about the confusion.

> Where are you opening them? In a browser (clicking on web links) or are these
> locally stored files?

The PDF files are locally stored files.

> Maybe due to "Updating Online Components? Have you tried uninstalling and
> reinstalling? How about trying AcroReader 6?

Sure, I'll try uninstalling AcroReader v5.0 and
installing AcroReader 6.

> There are too many possible issues to go into here. Adobe products are
> incredibly complex. I see that you have also posted to the Adobe groups, though
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> > seems to stay that way for minutes.  Anyone know what might be causing this
> problem?
Gary S. Terhune - 24 Dec 2003 09:30 GMT
I don't know that AcroReader 6 will seem like an improvement. Neither one of
them is lightening quick, and everything else being equal, it seems like 6 is
slower... But the simple act of uninstalling/reinstalling either may "fix"
things.

It's my impression that Adobe Products aren't really written with Windows users
as priority. The whole logic underlying much of their stuff would appear to be
born of Mac logic instead, and the translation has never seemed to worked well.
Not really clear that I have that right, it's just my impression.
Signature

Gary S. Terhune
MS MVP for Windows 9x

*Recommended Help Sites*
http://www.dts-l.org
http://www.mvps.org
http://www.aumha.org

How to Use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups
http://support.microsoft.com/?pr=newswhelp
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

> > What program is associated with PDF files? What program opens? Adobe Acrobat or
> > Acrobat Reader? If AcroReader, which version? You certainly don't want full
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
> > > seems to stay that way for minutes.  Anyone know what might be causing this
> > problem?
Adam - 24 Dec 2003 20:05 GMT
Yes, installing AcroReader 6 after uninstalling AcroReader 5 did improve the
speed at which PDF files open.  Although it's not lightening fast,
it is no longer taking minutes to load a PDF file.

> I don't know that AcroReader 6 will seem like an improvement. Neither one of
> them is lightening quick, and everything else being equal, it seems like 6 is
[quoted text clipped - 85 lines]
> this
> > > problem?
Gary S. Terhune - 25 Dec 2003 01:35 GMT
Glad to hear it.

I suspect you may get more satisfactory results if you now uninstall v6 and
reinstall v5, though gunginess may still remain in the Registry entries for v5
that only a manual cleansing can remedy. Considering the pig that v6 is, it
might be worth a try.

Signature

Gary S. Terhune
MS MVP for Windows 9x

*Recommended Help Sites*
http://www.dts-l.org
http://www.mvps.org
http://www.aumha.org

How to Use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups
http://support.microsoft.com/?pr=newswhelp
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

> Yes, installing AcroReader 6 after uninstalling AcroReader 5 did improve the
> speed at which PDF files open.  Although it's not lightening fast,
[quoted text clipped - 89 lines]
> > this
> > > > problem?
Adam - 25 Dec 2003 06:28 GMT
Thanks for the suggestion but I'm happy with v6.

> Glad to hear it.
>
[quoted text clipped - 123 lines]
> > > this
> > > > > problem?
cquirke (MVP Win9x) - 25 Dec 2003 08:02 GMT
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 01:30:18 -0800, "Gary S. Terhune"

>I don't know that AcroReader 6 will seem like an improvement. Neither one of
>them is lightening quick, and everything else being equal, it seems like 6 is
>slower... But the simple act of uninstalling/reinstalling either may "fix"

Dunno whether it's because I have the "full" version 6 viewer vs.
trimmer editions of versions 5.xx, but I find 6 materially slower.

However, version 5.00 has been bugfixed to 5.05 (as I recall) then
hopped up slightly to 5.1 - so if you want to "upgrade your way out of
trouble", you can do so from 5.00 without having to commit to 6.

>---------------- ----- ---- --- -- - -  -    -
  The Festering Season: Tis the time to be drunk and disorderly
>---------------- ----- ---- --- -- - -  -    -
Gary S. Terhune - 25 Dec 2003 09:20 GMT
Having the full Adobe Design Suite, I can tell you that as a class they are slow
and heavy to open in Windows. The trade off is stability, capacity, and relative
durability once they are up and running.

AcroReader 6 *seems* to be slow even scrolling, sometimes, but I'm beginning to
think this is more due to poorly executed PDF writing on many fronts.

Yes, 5.05 seems to be the best of class at this time (not sure I spent much time
with 5.1), but as I say, that may be due to lack of "features" that in 6 can be
handy--provided the file itself is rigged for such use.

Signature

Gary S. Terhune
MS MVP for Windows 9x

*Recommended Help Sites*
http://www.dts-l.org
http://www.mvps.org
http://www.aumha.org

How to Use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups
http://support.microsoft.com/?pr=newswhelp
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

> On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 01:30:18 -0800, "Gary S. Terhune"
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>    The Festering Season: Tis the time to be drunk and disorderly
> >---------------- ----- ---- --- -- - -  -    -
wa0goz@arrl.net - 24 Dec 2003 15:16 GMT
When I went from Adobe Reader 4 to 5, it was like going from day to
night.  5 is terribly slow.  I was thinking of going back to 4, but
maybe someone will let us know if 6 is faster loading.

Henry

> > What program is associated with PDF files? What program opens? Adobe Acrobat or
> > Acrobat Reader? If AcroReader, which version? You certainly don't want full
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
> > > seems to stay that way for minutes.  Anyone know what might be causing this
> > problem?
Bill in Co - 24 Dec 2003 17:23 GMT
It's been awhile since I made that upgrade from version 5 to 6, but if I
remember right, version 6 might be faster AFTER the first time it's invoked,
due to (the then) resident code being kept in memory.   Perhaps someone else
here remembers.

> When I went from Adobe Reader 4 to 5, it was like going from day to
> night.  5 is terribly slow.  I was thinking of going back to 4, but
[quoted text clipped - 61 lines]
>>>> and seems to stay that way for minutes.  Anyone know what might be causing
>>>> this problem?
Gary S. Terhune - 24 Dec 2003 17:44 GMT
I think *perhaps* a large factor in AcroReader response is whether you have
other Adobe Products installed, and how many additional components. I *feels*
like every related portion of the Registry and other components are enumerated
during startup of any Adobe product. Font enumeration is also a slow an tedious
one in many of them.

Signature

Gary S. Terhune
MS MVP for Windows 9x

*Recommended Help Sites*
http://www.dts-l.org
http://www.mvps.org
http://www.aumha.org

How to Use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups
http://support.microsoft.com/?pr=newswhelp
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

> It's been awhile since I made that upgrade from version 5 to 6, but if I
> remember right, version 6 might be faster AFTER the first time it's invoked,
[quoted text clipped - 66 lines]
> >>>> and seems to stay that way for minutes.  Anyone know what might be causing
> >>>> this problem?
willille - 24 Dec 2003 21:09 GMT
> When I went from Adobe Reader 4 to 5, it was like going from day to
> night.  5 is terribly slow.  I was thinking of going back to 4, but
> maybe someone will let us know if 6 is faster loading.
>
> Henry

I installed 6 and it was twice as slow as 5. I uninstalled 6 and went back to 5.
willille
Bill in Co - 24 Dec 2003 23:17 GMT
>> When I went from Adobe Reader 4 to 5, it was like going from day to
>> night.  5 is terribly slow.  I was thinking of going back to 4, but
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I installed 6 and it was twice as slow as 5. I uninstalled 6 and went back to
> 5. willille

Not after it's been "initialized" the first time, is it?   I mean, after you
have used it once after bootup, when you bring it up again it's pretty fast (or
so I thought).
Gary S. Terhune - 25 Dec 2003 01:37 GMT
My experience is that 6 is noticeably slower to load, and more piggy in other
ways, too. Still, it has some nice features that I've found indispensable in my
work, though my current state of mental chaos prevents me from remembering what
they are, <s>.

Signature

Gary S. Terhune
MS MVP for Windows 9x

*Recommended Help Sites*
http://www.dts-l.org
http://www.mvps.org
http://www.aumha.org

How to Use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups
http://support.microsoft.com/?pr=newswhelp
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

> >> When I went from Adobe Reader 4 to 5, it was like going from day to
> >> night.  5 is terribly slow.  I was thinking of going back to 4, but
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> have used it once after bootup, when you bring it up again it's pretty fast (or
> so I thought).
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.