Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsWindows VistaWindows XPWindows MeWindows 98Windows 95Virtual PCInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressWindows MediaSecurity
Related Topics
MS Server ProductsMS OfficePC HardwareMore Topics ...

Windows Forum / Windows Me / Internet / July 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Slow broadband connection

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Pep - 15 Jul 2005 16:43 GMT
Hi There,

I've recently got connected to Plusnet's 2MB unmetered service and I can't
seem to get a decent connection speed. I have 2 PCs, 1 is a desktop running
Win Me, connected to a D-Link DSL-G604T wireless ADSL router via a DWL-G122
USB (1.1) adapter. The other is an IBM thinkpad T41p using a wireless lan
mini PCI adapter, Win XP, which also connects to the router.

With the laptop I can get very close to 2Mbps, but with my desktop, the best
I can get is 433kbps, although it averages 400kbps

I have the following security options enabled WPA & Mac address access
control, don't know if this affects anything, although doesn't seem to affect
the laptop.

I tried installing a 2.0 USB card and wired network interface card, the
results are below:

Using the USB 2.0 card: No difference. I even moved the AP right next to the
USB adapter so that the signal strength was 100%. No cigar.

Using the NIC: Connection speed lept up to around 600Kbps which is an
improvement of approx 50% but still no-where near the consistent 1.8Mbps I
can get with the laptop.

Do I ditch ME and trying upgrading to XP? Anyone got any other ideas on
other settings I could change on ME box?

Frustrated.
Pep
N. Miller - 16 Jul 2005 07:16 GMT
> Do I ditch ME and trying upgrading to XP? Anyone got any other ideas on
> other settings I could change on ME box?

The OS shouldn't affect your connection speed. I regularly pull 1,290 to
1,301 downloads with SBC Yahoo! DSL Service on their 1,536kpbs Express
package. PPPoE and ATM overhead eat the difference between what I actually
get and my potential maximum; all with Windows ME.

USB 1.1 should be good for 12Mbps, considerably higher than your 2Mbps
maximum.

Have you tweaked your MTU settings in the Windows ME computer? It should be
capable of matching the Windows XP dl/ul speeds.

Signature

Norman
~Win dain a lotica, En vai tu ri, Si lo ta
~Fin dein a loluca, En dragu a sei lain
~Vi fa-ru les shutai am, En riga-lint

Pep - 16 Jul 2005 10:54 GMT
I had a fiddle with the registry, and changed the DefaultRcvWindow value from
2144 to 34432640. Solved it.

Pep

> > Do I ditch ME and trying upgrading to XP? Anyone got any other ideas on
> > other settings I could change on ME box?
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Have you tweaked your MTU settings in the Windows ME computer? It should be
> capable of matching the Windows XP dl/ul speeds.
N. Miller - 16 Jul 2005 17:01 GMT
> I had a fiddle with the registry, and changed the DefaultRcvWindow value from
> 2144 to 34432640. Solved it.

Forgot about that one. Both RWIN and MTU are optimized for dial-up
connections in Windows ME. BroadBandReports has some tools to manage
optimzization of each for HSI connections. IIRC, my RWIN is about the same
as yours. If your DSL requires PPPoE, MTU has to be lowered from 1500; I am
using 1492, but others have had to go lower. I don't know if the same
applies for PPPoA. I think that DSL users who don't need PPPoE can go with
the MTU at 1500. Not sure really, though.

http://www.broadbandreports.com

Signature

Norman
~Win dain a lotica, En vai tu ri, Si lo ta
~Fin dein a loluca, En dragu a sei lain
~Vi fa-ru les shutai am, En riga-lint

Cymbal Man Freq. - 17 Jul 2005 08:17 GMT
| I had a fiddle with the registry, and changed the DefaultRcvWindow value from
| 2144 to 34432640. Solved it.

No one knows why this works, it is illogical and does not compute. However, it
doubled my cable speed!
I've got 1461 kbps download speed now; instead of 765 kbps with a
DefaultRcvWindow value of 64240.

My upload speed is only 375 kbps.
Are there any unusual hacks to bring that speed way up too?

*******************************************************************
http://www.speedguide.net/downloads.php
This is an old beast back in our downloads list by popular demand. Note this is
an older patch, by a company that is no longer in business :). A lot of people
reported drastic speed increase using this patch in the past. It's a program
that was supported by @Home Cable Modem Service at the beginning of 1998, and it
claims to make registry changes in order to increase Cable modem performance.
The only key it makes changes to, that I'm aware of is "DefaultRcvWindow". It
changes it to "373360" ?! The only disadvantage that I know of, is that that the
373360 RWIN value seems bogus, since it is not multiple of MSS. Another fact is
that such large value is not supported under Windows 95 and NT4, only Windows
98,98SE,ME,2k,XP have Large TCP Windows Support. To get the last bit of
performance out of your Cable Modem, I'd recommend changing the RWin setting to
some multiple of MSS after applying the patch (use our TCP Optimizer, check the
Registry Tweaks section , or install one of our Generic Registry patches) after
applying the @Home patch. This patch was not supported by the @Home staff after
1998, according to them "It might cause some problems with stream video..." If
you still want it, you can download it from here. I couldn't reproduce any
problems with "video streaming" while running the patch. If you want to
uninstall this patch for some reason, you can do it easily from "Control Panel >
Add/Remove Programs" - look for "Quest@Home"
N. Miller - 17 Jul 2005 10:21 GMT
> I've got 1461 kbps download speed now; instead of 765 kbps with a
> DefaultRcvWindow value of 64240.
>
> My upload speed is only 375 kbps.
> Are there any unusual hacks to bring that speed way up too?

From your article headers:

NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.66.252.81

From Sam Spade:

07/17/05 02:08:22 dns 66.66.252.81
nslookup 66.66.252.81
Canonical name: cpe-66-66-252-81.rochester.res.rr.com
Addresses:
 66.66.252.81

What is your HSI account plan? Road Runner is advertising a 5,000kbps
download plan, so your 1,461kbps seems a tad shy of your potential maximum.
I don't see an upload speed mentioned, but yours seems in the ballpark for
a standard 384kbps plan.

BTW, Road Runner is claiming to be 3x faster than DSL. As usual, though,
the cable company is using last year's DSL speeds for this year's
comparisons. For half the price of 5-6Mbps down DSL will give you half the
speed; but often with twice the up speed.

Signature

Norman
~Win dain a lotica, En vai tu ri, Si lo ta
~Fin dein a loluca, En dragu a sei lain
~Vi fa-ru les shutai am, En riga-lint

Pep - 18 Jul 2005 15:24 GMT
Interesting stuff, as I have a 2Mb connection, what's the maximum download
speed I should expect? it's currently approx. 230KBs.

Thanks.
Pep.

> > I've got 1461 kbps download speed now; instead of 765 kbps with a
> > DefaultRcvWindow value of 64240.
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> comparisons. For half the price of 5-6Mbps down DSL will give you half the
> speed; but often with twice the up speed.
N. Miller - 18 Jul 2005 17:15 GMT
>>> I've got 1461 kbps download speed now; instead of 765 kbps with a
>>> DefaultRcvWindow value of 64240.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>> seems a tad shy of your potential maximum. I don't see an upload speed
>> mentioned, but yours seems in the ballpark for a standard 384kbps plan.

> Interesting stuff, as I have a 2Mb connection, what's the maximum download
> speed I should expect? it's currently approx. 230KBs.

8 bits per byte, and a little overhead...I would say that you are in the
ballpark; assuming that by 230KBs you mean 230 kilo Bytes per second.

Signature

Norman
~Win dain a lotica, En vai tu ri, Si lo ta
~Fin dein a loluca, En dragu a sei lain
~Vi fa-ru les shutai am, En riga-lint

Pep - 19 Jul 2005 11:34 GMT
Yup, thanks.

> >>> I've got 1461 kbps download speed now; instead of 765 kbps with a
> >>> DefaultRcvWindow value of 64240.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> 8 bits per byte, and a little overhead...I would say that you are in the
> ballpark; assuming that by 230KBs you mean 230 kilo Bytes per second.
Pep - 18 Jul 2005 15:24 GMT
Interesting stuff, as I have a 2Mb connection, what's the maximum download
speed I should expect? it's currently approx. 230KBs.

Thanks.
Pep.

> > I've got 1461 kbps download speed now; instead of 765 kbps with a
> > DefaultRcvWindow value of 64240.
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> comparisons. For half the price of 5-6Mbps down DSL will give you half the
> speed; but often with twice the up speed.
KB - 22 Jul 2005 01:51 GMT
Hi, Pep.  I'm curious as the the registry key that contains this value.  I
have RoadRunner but the download speed is only about 1000.

Thanks (and nice slueth work to find it),

KB

> I had a fiddle with the registry, and changed the DefaultRcvWindow value from
> 2144 to 34432640. Solved it.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> > Have you tweaked your MTU settings in the Windows ME computer? It should be
> > capable of matching the Windows XP dl/ul speeds.
N. Miller - 22 Jul 2005 06:58 GMT
> Hi, Pep.  I'm curious as the the registry key that contains this value.  I
> have RoadRunner but the download speed is only about 1000.

Go here:

http://www.broadbandreports.com/

Look for their tweaks section. They have a nice guide, and some
downloadable tools which help find, and set, both MTU and RWIN.

Signature

Norman
~Win dain a lotica, En vai tu ri, Si lo ta
~Fin dein a loluca, En dragu a sei lain
~Vi fa-ru les shutai am, En riga-lint

KB - 23 Jul 2005 19:04 GMT
Thanks, Norman.  Interesting reading although I don't see any downloads for
WinME.

I also searched my registry and found absolutely no DefaultRcvWindow
entries.

Now I'm surprised RoadRunner even works <lol>

KB

> > Hi, Pep.  I'm curious as the the registry key that contains this value.  I
> > have RoadRunner but the download speed is only about 1000.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Look for their tweaks section. They have a nice guide, and some
> downloadable tools which help find, and set, both MTU and RWIN.
N. Miller - 23 Jul 2005 23:49 GMT
>>> Hi, Pep.  I'm curious as the the registry key that contains this value.
>>> I have RoadRunner but the download speed is only about 1000.

>> Go here:

>> http://www.broadbandreports.com/

>> Look for their tweaks section. They have a nice guide, and some
>> downloadable tools which help find, and set, both MTU and RWIN.

> Thanks, Norman.  Interesting reading although I don't see any downloads for
> WinME.

> I also searched my registry and found absolutely no DefaultRcvWindow
> entries.

> Now I'm surprised RoadRunner even works <lol>

Really? Did you miss this?

http://www.broadbandreports.com/drtcp

I am not sure where the RWIN value is stored. It is set on my WinME
computer, but plugging the value (30324) into a registry search draws a
blank.

Signature

Norman
~Win dain a lotica, En vai tu ri, Si lo ta
~Fin dein a loluca, En dragu a sei lain
~Vi fa-ru les shutai am, En riga-lint

KB - 24 Jul 2005 20:53 GMT
Thanks, Norman.  I did miss that.  My system's been struggling a bit as of
late and I've gotten it running smoothly again.

I did save your link to my favorites and may look at it later.  Right now
I'm taking a hands off approach and just using the system without changing
or adding anything.

Thanks again, Norman.

KB

> >>> Hi, Pep.  I'm curious as the the registry key that contains this value.
> >>> I have RoadRunner but the download speed is only about 1000.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> computer, but plugging the value (30324) into a registry search draws a
> blank.
Pep - 25 Jul 2005 10:45 GMT
Hi KB,

Norm's right you can find info on that web-site. The actual site I used
which contained details of Win ME tweaks was this one:  
http://www.speedguide.net/read_articles.php?id=119
The only tweak I made was the first one.

There's a handy download called Dr TCP (just search using google) which you
can also use to tweak your registry without manually having do it in regedit.

Hope this helps.
Pep

> Thanks, Norman.  I did miss that.  My system's been struggling a bit as of
> late and I've gotten it running smoothly again.
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> > computer, but plugging the value (30324) into a registry search draws a
> > blank.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.