www.careyholzman.com/net1.htm
Carey
>I have two machines that I would like to network using a crossover cable
>but am having problems.
[quoted text clipped - 231 lines]
>
> Secondary WINS Server: Blank
> I have two machines that I would like to network using a crossover cable but
> am having problems.
> Basically, I can't get the 2 Machines to see each other.
> I have run Network Setup wizards to no avail. I have scoured the net for a
> way to solve my problems and tried numerous suggestions, still no luck.
> Many places on the Net state that setting up a simple network between two
> Windows machines using a crossover cable is easy!!! I have considered buying
> a Hub but for all I know (not a lot but learning fast) I may well be no
> better off. Any suggestions would be most welcome.
From your comments about a USB ADSL modem I assume that you also have ICS
set up, with the Windows XP computer as the "gateway" computer. That is
unfortunate; for sharing an Interenet connection a broadband router is the
preferred way to go, but that requires an Ethernet ADSL modem. Anyway, that
really isn't the problem. There is an extremely small chance that a cross
over cable won't work to connect to computers. Those cables were designed
for linking hubs and switches; connecting two computers should be done with
a hub, or a switch. Most broadband routers incorporate a switch; but they
only work with Ethernet modems.
Anyway, your problem isn't the Internet connection, but the basic ability of
the computers to communicate. I see one setting on your Windows Me computer
which differs from mine; on the TCP/IP Propteries "advanced" tab you have
"Allow Binding to ATM" set to "Yes". On my computer this is set to "No". Try
changing that; but wait! I am not done, yet...
I see no mention of the setting for the "browsemaster". This is found on the
"File and printer sharing for Microsoft Networks" properties, the
"advanced" tab. Try setting that to "disabled" on the Windows Me computer.
While you're at it, make sure that the "LM Announce" setting is at "No".
It seems that it can take up to 15 minutes after starting the computers
until the network can sort out which computer should be the "Browsemaster".
In your case I am pretty certain that should be the Windows XP computer.
But, if the Windows Me computer is not set to "disabled", that computer will
establish itself as the "browsemaster", which can then interfere with the
Windows XP computer.
When the Windows Me computer "browsemaster" setting is "disabled", give your
network about twenty minutes, then try and see if they can see each other.
Other than that, I am guessing that you took your "ipconfig" readings while
disconnected from the Internet. I saw no gateway IP addresses. With an
Internet connection, the Windows XP gateway IP address should match your ISP
connection IP address, while your Windows Me gateway IP address should be
the same as the Windows XP LAN IP address; I.e., 192.168.0.1. Both computers
should have DNS server IP addresses which match those of your ISP.

Signature
Norman
~Win dain a lotica, En vai tu ri, Si lo ta
~Fin dein a loluca, En dragu a sei lain
~Vi fa-ru les shutai am, En riga-lint
I have both at home and had a similar problem because of zone alarm on both
computers. If ZA is at it's weakest settings or off it works. Mine are
behind a router firewall so it's not a problem for me (I think.) Hope this
helps.
>I have two machines that I would like to network using a crossover cable
>but am having problems.
[quoted text clipped - 231 lines]
>
> Secondary WINS Server: Blank
N. Miller - 30 Dec 2004 05:45 GMT
> I have both at home and had a similar problem because of zone alarm on both
> computers. If ZA is at it's weakest settings or off it works. Mine are
> behind a router firewall so it's not a problem for me (I think.) Hope this
> helps.
Did you not put your LAN IP address range in ZA's trusted zone? I don't know
if it wants the netmask (typically 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0), or an IP
address range (typically 192.168.1.1 to 192.168.1.255).

Signature
Norman
~Win dain a lotica, En vai tu ri, Si lo ta
~Fin dein a loluca, En dragu a sei lain
~Vi fa-ru les shutai am, En riga-lint
Fred - 30 Dec 2004 19:28 GMT
Sure didn't. Can you do this on the free version? If so how?
>> I have both at home and had a similar problem because of zone alarm on
>> both
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> if it wants the netmask (typically 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0), or an IP
> address range (typically 192.168.1.1 to 192.168.1.255).
N. Miller - 31 Dec 2004 08:10 GMT
> Sure didn't. Can you do this on the free version? If so how?
I haven't used ZAF since I discovered that it won't offer full protection on
an ICS host. Although I switched from using ICS to using a router when I
went to ADSL service, I just stayed with the firewall that worked for me;
for the outbound coverage.
I am pretty sure that there is a way to add your LAN IP address range so ZAF
will trust it, but I just can't remember how I did it. Hopefully, somebody
who does know will come along; or, explore all of the ZAF configuration
menus. If you do find a setting, and it works, post back to this thread for
the benefit of other ZAF users.

Signature
Norman
~Win dain a lotica, En vai tu ri, Si lo ta
~Fin dein a loluca, En dragu a sei lain
~Vi fa-ru les shutai am, En riga-lint
B.J.Honeycut - 09 Jan 2005 16:25 GMT
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 08:10:43 GMT,N. Miller
<anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> penned this whopper in
microsoft.public.windowsme.networking
>> Sure didn't. Can you do this on the free version? If so how?
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> the ZAF configuration menus. If you do find a setting, and it works,
> post back to this thread for the benefit of other ZAF users.
IIRC, the only difference between ZAP and ZAF was that you have to add the
address range manually.

Signature
"Time will bring to light whatever is hidden;
it will cover up and conceal what is now shining in splendor."
Horace (65 - 8 BC); Roman poet.
Mike