Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsWindows VistaWindows XPWindows MeWindows 98Windows 95Virtual PCInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressWindows MediaSecurity
Related Topics
MS Server ProductsMS OfficePC HardwareMore Topics ...

Windows Forum / Windows Me / Printing and Faxing / June 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

HP Deskjet 340 USB setup

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Tracey - 02 Jun 2004 20:14 GMT
I have a DP 340 I want to use with a laptop running ME,
via a USB printer cable.  The printer normaly used a
standard printer cable. The laptop can not be upgraded to
XP due to limited RAM memory.
I have been able to do this on a loptop running XP but
can not direct the printer to a USB port.
I would greatly appreciate any suggentions.
Tracey
Cari \(MS-MVP\) - 02 Jun 2004 21:08 GMT
This printer does not have a USB interface.
Signature

Cari
MS-MVP Windows Technologies - Printing/Imaging/Hardware
www.coribright.com

>I have a DP 340 I want to use with a laptop running ME,
> via a USB printer cable.  The printer normaly used a
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I would greatly appreciate any suggentions.
> Tracey
Rick T - 03 Jun 2004 06:39 GMT
> I have a DP 340 I want to use with a laptop running ME,
> via a USB printer cable.  The printer normaly used a
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I would greatly appreciate any suggentions.
> Tracey

umm... what?

Why would you want to use USB when you have a parallel cable there that
does the job better IMHO.

Rick
Cari \(MS-MVP\) - 03 Jun 2004 19:55 GMT
I would definitely NOT second that remark.  USB wins over parallel ANY TIME!
Signature

Cari
MS-MVP Windows Technologies - Printing/Imaging/Hardware
www.coribright.com

> Why would you want to use USB when you have a parallel cable there that
> does the job better IMHO.
>
> Rick
Rick T - 04 Jun 2004 11:02 GMT
Cari (MS-MVP) wrote:

> I would definitely NOT second that remark.  USB wins over parallel ANY TIME!

Number of problems I have had with devices plugging into parallel port = 0

Number of problems I have had with devices plugging into USB port = 5

Rick
but I'm including incredibly crappy drivers/software in that total, too.
Noel Paton - 04 Jun 2004 22:57 GMT
Ah - you used a Lexmark, then?

Signature

Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2004, Win9x)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.btinternet.com/~winnoel/millsrpch.htm

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's
or
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2001/Mar01/Mar27pmvp.asp


>> but I'm including incredibly crappy drivers/software in that total, too.
Rick T - 05 Jun 2004 04:36 GMT
> Ah - you used a Lexmark, then?

I actually usually have very little problems with Big Blue stuff, but
the Canons, Xerox and HP have all worked quite well on the parallel
port, as have several scanners and a tape drive and an early version of
"file sharing".

But every bleepin' time I go to install something on the USB, I always
end up haveing to install it at least twice, and usually there's some
compromise (on my end) concerning perceived vs. actual functionality
that just rubs me the wrong way.

Rick
Noel Paton - 05 Jun 2004 07:20 GMT
You're showing your age, Rick -  LexMark haven't been owned by Big Blue
since around 1991!!

Signature

Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2004, Win9x)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.btinternet.com/~winnoel/millsrpch.htm

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's
or
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2001/Mar01/Mar27pmvp.asp

>
> > Ah - you used a Lexmark, then?
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Rick
Rick T - 06 Jun 2004 17:23 GMT
> You're showing your age, Rick -  LexMark haven't been owned by Big Blue
> since around 1991!!

Heheh, my senility, possibly, my age... let's just say I'm not *quite*
old enough to be wary about leaving my coffee on top of the printer
(another IBM reference... *very* dated).

Rick
Chuck - 11 Jun 2004 03:12 GMT
Not always. The older printers and win versions have various USB related
problems that can drive a user back to parallel.  Parallel ports have a
different set of problems that are fairly well known. The usb issues seem to
split between USB port hardware, older printer mfrs USB suppor drivers, and
the install process.
> I would definitely NOT second that remark.  USB wins over parallel ANY TIME!
>
> > Why would you want to use USB when you have a parallel cable there that
> > does the job better IMHO.
> >
> > Rick
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.