Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsWindows VistaWindows XPWindows MeWindows 98Windows 95Virtual PCInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressWindows MediaSecurity
Related Topics
MS Server ProductsMS OfficePC HardwareMore Topics ...

Windows Forum / Windows Me / General Topics / February 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Scandisk on bootup

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Vera - 25 Feb 2005 19:23 GMT
I have a Gateway computer that is about 4 years old.  It was having numerous
problems.  I formatted the hard drive and zeroed the drive using the restore
disks from Gateway.  The computer works fine except that every time the
computer boots, it wants to do a thorough surface scan using scandisk.  I
have just left it on minimal running options for several months and haven't
really added anything new just to see what would happen.  Nothing new has
happened.  I have kept it off of the Internet to maintain a level of purity.  
Nothing interesting has happened.  My only problem is scandisk.  No matter
whether I let it try to go through its thing or not, it continues to run
scandisk on boot up.  Anybody out ther have any clues as to what this oculd
be.  Is it some sort of virus that has attacked the bios chip? Would that do
this?

Is it absolutley necessary to replace the hard drive in this case?
webster72n - 25 Feb 2005 19:32 GMT
> I have a Gateway computer that is about 4 years old.  It was having numerous
> problems.  I formatted the hard drive and zeroed the drive using the restore
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Heck no. Be patient and wait for a reply.
John John - 25 Feb 2005 19:42 GMT
ScanDisk Runs Even Though Windows Shut Down Correctly
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/273017/EN-US/

John

> I have a Gateway computer that is about 4 years old.  It was having numerous
> problems.  I formatted the hard drive and zeroed the drive using the restore
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Is it absolutley necessary to replace the hard drive in this case?
Vera - 26 Feb 2005 01:19 GMT
Thank you so much....all of you for your help!!!  I will try your suggestions.
Vera

> ScanDisk Runs Even Though Windows Shut Down Correctly
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/273017/EN-US/
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> >
> > Is it absolutley necessary to replace the hard drive in this case?
Mike M - 25 Feb 2005 19:56 GMT
If scandisk is running each time you boot your PC this would suggest that
the PC is not shutting down correctly.  One possibility is that your PC or
rather hard disk shuts down too quickly which can then cause Scandisk to
run when you next boot.

You can delay shutdown by editing the registry and increasing the value of
the DWORD CacheWriteDelay found at
HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion. This is useful where fast
hard disks are used that shutdown before all cached data has been written
to them.  If you haven't already done so you should install the "Windows
IDE Hard Drive Cache Package" patch from the Windows Update site (For more
details see MS KB 273017 - "ScanDisk Runs Even Though Windows Shut Down
Correctly" (http://support.microsoft.com?kbid=273017).

Tracking down shutdown and power-off problems (they differ) can be
somewhat difficult but may I suggest that you start by having a look at MS
KB 273746 - "How to Troubleshoot Windows Me Shutdown Problems"
(http://support.microsoft.com?kbid=273746) and then move on to Jim
Eshelman's pages at http://aumha.org/win4/a/shutdown.htm and
http://aumha.org/win4/a/shtdwnme.htm which cover this topic.  Hopefully
you will find advice there that will help your resolve your problem.

The Windows Me Startup and Shutdown Troubleshooting Wizard is located in
the Help and Support Centre in Windows Me or at the following Microsoft
Web site: http://support.microsoft.com/support/windows/tshoot/
Signature

Mike Maltby MS-MVP
mike.maltby@gmail.com

> I have a Gateway computer that is about 4 years old.  It was having
> numerous problems.  I formatted the hard drive and zeroed the drive
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Is it absolutley necessary to replace the hard drive in this case?
John... - 26 Feb 2005 19:09 GMT
You can disable scandisk on bootup by this method.
Some might say its not a good idea,but I have mine
set this way and have had no problems.
Click Start/click Run.
Type "msconfig" without the quotes into the box that
appears.Click Ok.
In the next box that appears click on the General tab.
In the next box tick "Disable Scandisk After Bad Shutdown"
Click OK then Apply.
Restart your computer.
If you need to run Scandisk,which I do once a month along with disk
defragmenter,you can find it from
Start/Programs/Accessories/System Tools/Scandisk.

John
Noel Paton - 26 Feb 2005 19:23 GMT
not 'some' - but 'MOST' would say that disabling ScanDisk in this way is not
only inadvisable, but just plain stupid.

Signature

Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2005, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.btinternet.com/~winnoel/millsrpch.htm
http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's

> You can disable scandisk on bootup by this method.
> Some might say its not a good idea,but I have mine
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> John
Mike M - 26 Feb 2005 19:33 GMT
You say stupid, I say crazy.  :-)  Same result regardless.  :-(
Signature

Mike Maltby MS-MVP
mike.maltby@gmail.com

> not 'some' - but 'MOST' would say that disabling ScanDisk in this way
> is not only inadvisable, but just plain stupid.
John... - 26 Feb 2005 19:41 GMT
> You say stupid, I say crazy.  :-)  Same result regardless.  :-(

OFFER SOME REASON BEHIND YOUR COMMENT!!!!!!!!!
John
Mike M - 26 Feb 2005 19:49 GMT
It all depends on whether you value the data stored on your computer or
not.  You apparently don't or you wouldn't have disabled scandisk.  Your
loss.  Just think of the further damage you might cause your system if you
start your PC with an already damaged file store due to a previous crash
or other shutdown problem.  If you don't fix the problem immediately you
are likely to cause further damage with loss of files and a monthly
scandisk will be far too late to stand a chance of recovering the
situation.  All for saving a microsecond or two on boot up.
Signature

Mike Maltby MS-MVP
mike.maltby@gmail.com

> OFFER SOME REASON BEHIND YOUR COMMENT!!!!!!!!!
John... - 26 Feb 2005 20:03 GMT
> It all depends on whether you value the data stored on your computer or
> not.  You apparently don't or you wouldn't have disabled scandisk.  Your
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> scandisk will be far too late to stand a chance of recovering the
> situation.  All for saving a microsecond or two on boot up.

I do value my data.As I said I rarely have any problems
with my pc.This machine is in constant use.
I do my regular housekeeping and it runs as sweet as it
did when I bought it about 4 years ago.Never had a loss of
data or component failure and I have never reinstalled the OS.
Also my pc is never switched off unless software installs call
for it and is connected to the internet at all times.
John
Mike M - 26 Feb 2005 20:07 GMT
You'll learn.  Unfortunately it'll probably be the hard way.
Signature

Mike Maltby MS-MVP
mike.maltby@gmail.com

> I do value my data.As I said I rarely have any problems
> with my pc.This machine is in constant use.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Also my pc is never switched off unless software installs call
> for it and is connected to the internet at all times.
John... - 27 Feb 2005 17:12 GMT
> You'll learn.  Unfortunately it'll probably be the hard way.

What,like after another 4 years of smooth pc operation?
I don't think you know half as much as you think you do.
John
Mike M - 27 Feb 2005 17:42 GMT
> What,like after another 4 years of smooth pc operation?
> I don't think you know half as much as you think you do.

What I know is irrelevant here however what I do know from your postings
is that you know far less than you think you do.
Signature

Mike Maltby MS-MVP
mike.maltby@gmail.com

John... - 27 Feb 2005 18:30 GMT
> > What,like after another 4 years of smooth pc operation?
> > I don't think you know half as much as you think you do.
>
> What I know is irrelevant here however what I do know from your postings
> is that you know far less than you think you do.

Irrelevent?If thats the case,why keep posting on these groups?
You just about admitted you don't know what the hell you are
talking about.Stop conning MS about your so called
knowledge of their systems and resign from the MVP program.
Do us all a favour and put your soap box back in the cupboard.
John
Norman Conquest - 27 Feb 2005 18:40 GMT
Troll..  http://members.aol.com/intwg/trolls.htm

Norm

>> > What,like after another 4 years of smooth pc operation?
>> > I don't think you know half as much as you think you do.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Do us all a favour and put your soap box back in the cupboard.
> John
John... - 27 Feb 2005 20:31 GMT
> Troll..  http://members.aol.com/intwg/trolls.htm
>
> Norm

Who the hell are you calling a troll.Fact is,mate,I post on here
trying to help other users and the MVP brigade do nothing but
rip any advice given to bits.Why do they think that they are always right
and everyone else is wrong?
Carry on pal,listen to them.Stuff everyone else.
To all posters who offer advice on these groups,don't bother.
The MVP's will only shout you down using words like stupid,crazy etc.From
now on leave the advice to the "experts"
or don't bother posting at all.Think the groups should have
"MVP's only to answer any questions,as everyone else is
stupid" added to the group names.

John
Noel Paton - 27 Feb 2005 20:54 GMT
The only reason - and the only time - anyone 'rips into you' is when you
post bad advice.

If you refuse to learn from the experience and knowledge of others, that's
your problem - but don't try and foist your misguided ideas onto others with
little or no knowledge, without expecting to get called out on it.

Signature

Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2005, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.btinternet.com/~winnoel/millsrpch.htm
http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's

>> Troll..  http://members.aol.com/intwg/trolls.htm
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> John
John... - 28 Feb 2005 09:06 GMT
> The only reason - and the only time - anyone 'rips into you' is when you
> post bad advice.
>
> If you refuse to learn from the experience and knowledge of others, that's
> your problem - but don't try and foist your misguided ideas onto others with
> little or no knowledge, without expecting to get called out on it.

All hail the MVP's,"They are always right".So my advice
is always wrong,damn I'm sorry that you are so big headed
about your "knowledge".You and MM must be the only two
who have ever learned anything.I don't "foist" anything onto
anybody,it is their choice whether to take any advice given.
And its every time I post anything that you and him start
slagging me.I am amazed anyone posts anything at all when
you two are so brilliant at what you do.Maybe the V in MVP
means Vain?
John
John John - 28 Feb 2005 13:56 GMT
> ...I don't "foist" anything onto anybody,it is their choice whether
> to take any advice given.

Fair enough, but remember that people who post questions to Microsoft
newsgroups are looking for answers to problems, not more problems.  Also
remember that the skills of the poster may range from the completely
lost and daft to quasi expert.  Novice users may not understand the
implications or complications that may be caused by applying an
incorrect fix or suggestion, or a plainly dangerous idea.

One of the strengths of peer groups is that answers given are subject to
peer review and subject to corrections when incorrect or improper advice
is given.  Peer reviewers may also add additional information that the
helper may have omitted or otherwise clarify things.  Just accept that
your information was incorrect and move on, live and learn.  We all make
mistakes, I made a a mistake once, I thought I was wrong when actually I
was right...

John
Mike M - 27 Feb 2005 18:59 GMT
My knowledge and experience are irrelevant since the person with the lack
of knowledge under discussion is yourself.  You obviously have nothing
useful to contribute to this or any other thread in this newsgroup and as
such are no more than a worthless and ignorant troll.

PLONK
Signature

Mike Maltby MS-MVP
mike.maltby@gmail.com

> Irrelevent?If thats the case,why keep posting on these groups?
> You just about admitted you don't know what the hell you are
> talking about.Stop conning MS about your so called
> knowledge of their systems and resign from the MVP program.
> Do us all a favour and put your soap box back in the cupboard.
> John
John... - 27 Feb 2005 20:37 GMT
> My knowledge and experience are irrelevant since the person with the lack
> of knowledge under discussion is yourself.  You obviously have nothing
> useful to contribute to this or any other thread in this newsgroup and as
> such are no more than a worthless and ignorant troll.
>
> PLONK

What the hell is wrong with you,everytime I post anything on these groups
you start with the deregatory remarks.
WHAT THE HELL HAVE I EVER DONE TO YOU!!!!!!!!!!?
Name calling,was that part of your resume when you joined
the MVP program?
Give it up MATE,You and others like you are giving MVP's a
bad name.
John
Rick T - 28 Feb 2005 04:43 GMT
<further boring flame with MikeM... try to be more creative, gents, eh>

Disabling Scandisk without first finding out why it insists on starting
on each boot is a stupid idea.

Whether you actually think it is a good idea or it just sounded like a
good idea at the time isn't really germane.

Other than that <shrug> who cares (except the OP of course)

Rick
Shane - 28 Feb 2005 12:44 GMT
> <further boring flame with MikeM... try to be more creative, gents, eh>
>
> Disabling Scandisk without first finding out why it insists on starting
> on each boot is a stupid idea.

While failing to appreciate that just because one has never had a problem
proves precisely zero about it's safety, borders on the brain-damaged.

Shane
Noel Paton - 28 Feb 2005 20:29 GMT
Kinda like
'My Airbag's never been used yet - so I don't need it'

Signature

Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2005, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.btinternet.com/~winnoel/millsrpch.htm
http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's

>> <further boring flame with MikeM... try to be more creative, gents, eh>
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Shane
Rick T - 28 Feb 2005 20:45 GMT
>><further boring flame with MikeM... try to be more creative, gents, eh>
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Shane

The ability to keep the OS from running Scandisk automatically can be
useful if you commonly shut the thing down without letting it go through
the housekeeping functions first or if you're stuck with a program that
doesn't respond to shutting down properly, etc.  Marginal reasoning,
though, eventually something real breaks and then you wonder why your
system doens't work.

Rick
Shane - 28 Feb 2005 23:22 GMT
> >><further boring flame with MikeM... try to be more creative, gents, eh>
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> though, eventually something real breaks and then you wonder why your
> system doens't work.

Well, it's always a gamble - how much, varying, of course. My brother-in-law
seems to have forgotten how to shut down properly, as when he's here this
machine has a plague of bad shutdowns. I don't want to sit through scandisk
at almost every boot, so I'll tend to cancel the scan, check my e-mail or
whatever, then run ScanDefrag to make sure it gets done.

Shane
John John - 27 Feb 2005 09:52 GMT
Because after a crash or improper shutdown you may have damaged File
Allocation Table or worse yet damaged Partition Table.  Scandisk on
crash reboot will at least try to verify and recover these tables.
Without these tables you have no files, or lost files or no partitions!
 To paraphrase what Mike said, it's your data, do as you please with it.

We all do stupid things... like paying too much for car insurance.  But
you should be in a Verizon commercial or on Jackass.

Another John

>>You say stupid, I say crazy.  :-)  Same result regardless.  :-(
>
> OFFER SOME REASON BEHIND YOUR COMMENT!!!!!!!!!
> John
John... - 26 Feb 2005 19:36 GMT
> not 'some' - but 'MOST' would say that disabling ScanDisk in this way is not
> only inadvisable, but just plain stupid.

Oh God,here we go again.Noel,instead of saying it is
plain stupid,offer some reasons for your comments.
I have had scandisk set like this for at least 3 years
with no ill effects.My pc runs perfectly and rarely crashes.
Don't have many problems at all really and as I have said,I
run scandisk and defrag manually once a month.
Remember our little run in a while back,well lets not start
all that again.Lets have some constructive advice for the
group users.

John
Noel Paton - 27 Feb 2005 00:55 GMT
1) Scandisk running on boot is telling you there's a problem - disabling it
removes the cluestick.
2) It's too easy to forget to do the 'monthly maintenance' - so the
opportunity for a scan should be taken.
3) ....

Signature

Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2005, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.btinternet.com/~winnoel/millsrpch.htm
http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's

>> not 'some' - but 'MOST' would say that disabling ScanDisk in this way is
> not
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> John
Richard G. Harper - 26 Feb 2005 19:36 GMT
Only truly paranoid people would say that, Noel ... like the paranoid people
who look both ways before crossing the street.  ;-)

Signature

Richard G. Harper [MVP Shell/User]  rgharper@gmail.com
* PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups
* for the benefit of all.  Private mail is usually not replied to.
* My website, such as it is ... http://rgharper.mvps.org/
* HELP us help YOU ... http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm

> not 'some' - but 'MOST' would say that disabling ScanDisk in this way is
> not only inadvisable, but just plain stupid.
Mart - 26 Feb 2005 19:47 GMT
Using the same logic, I suppose I could disable my AV utility and just run
it once a month. I wouldn't know if I had a virus until the AV utility
picked it up when I ran it or unless my machine crashed first.

Makes sense, I suppose - and it would run faster too.

Mart

> You can disable scandisk on bootup by this method.
> Some might say its not a good idea,but I have mine
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> John
John... - 26 Feb 2005 19:52 GMT
> Using the same logic, I suppose I could disable my AV utility and just run
> it once a month. I wouldn't know if I had a virus until the AV utility
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Mart

Its up to you Mart,its your pc.
John
Mart - 26 Feb 2005 20:00 GMT
Interesting idea John, but I think that I will stick with convention.

Mart

>> Using the same logic, I suppose I could disable my AV utility and just
>> run
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Its up to you Mart,its your pc.
> John
John... - 26 Feb 2005 20:05 GMT
> Interesting idea John, but I think that I will stick with convention.
>
> Mart

Fair enough.
John
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.