 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Windows Forum / Windows Me / General Topics / November 2005Finding CD KEY from WinME CD :was help with logo.sys
I have lost my Jewel Case CD to my OEM WinME CD. It is a real hologram edge to edge CD. it has 0400 Part No X05-74739. I know how to recover a lost COA number or Jewel case CD Key from a system that is up and running before wiping it and installing if the key has been lost; but I have searched the Microsoft Knowledge base and Googled it, and I can only find where you have to contact Microsoft. The system the WinME was on has been sold and that user bought a retail WinXP Pro and I put it on and they let me keep my WinME OEM CD because they had no use for it. I called the user and they sold the machine long time ago because they wanted a better system then a 1Ghz. I said I would install the WinMe over the weekend and then have the definitive details one way or the other on the logo.sys Vs. sulogo.sys; however without the CD Key I don't see how I am going to be able to install the WinMe on my Spare test/pig machine. Anyone out there know how to, or if it is even possible to pull the cd key from the cd it's self? I sure don't know how to get it from just the original OEM CD and I sure don't feel like sending Microsoft $30 like what it said in one of the knowledge base articles for getting a replacement CD. Seeing as how I am a OEM and if I build a new system I can legally install the WinME cd to any new system I build and then sell the system; but I would of course have to let the WinME cd go with the system, and I would need the CD Key to do that, so as of right now the WinME CD is a useless coaster.  SignatureVIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien /} @###{ ]::::::Dino-Soft Software::::::> \} This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware Bwa ha ha!! What a long-winded excuse so you don't have to admit you were wrong!! ROFL!! A typical Sugiesque whining drone.... HF > I have lost my Jewel Case CD to my OEM WinME CD. It is a real > hologram edge to edge CD. it has 0400 Part No X05-74739. I know how to [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > would need the CD Key to do that, so as of right now the WinME CD is a > useless coaster. > Bwa ha ha!! What a long-winded excuse so you don't have to admit you were > wrong!! ROFL!! > > A typical Sugiesque whining drone.... Not only that - but he's wrong about the license, as well!! No matter WHO you are, an OEM License is tied to the machine it's frist installed on. SignatureNoel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows) Nil Carborundum Illegitemi http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm http://tinyurl.com/6oztj Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's > Not only that - but he's wrong about the license, as well!! > > No matter WHO you are, an OEM License is tied to the machine it's > frist installed on. Noel, I see "it" now admits to not knowing anything about logo.sys and now admits to have never tested "its" absurd theory. Goes to prove once again what a worthless and untrustworthy individual "it" is. Seems "it" knows as little about OEM licences as "it" does about anything relevant to this newsgroup. SignatureMike The only *it* around here are all the *it* that think they are either better or more knowledgeable then others simply because they have hung around a news group long enough to be able to accumulate some help files they can copy and past into the news group and regurgitate info that they did *not* learn but instead put into text files that they can pull up and paste and be a *canned* reply which a bot could do as well. >> Not only that - but he's wrong about the license, as well!! >> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > as little about OEM licences as "it" does about anything relevant to this > newsgroup. >> Bwa ha ha!! What a long-winded excuse so you don't have to admit you >> were wrong!! ROFL!! [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > No matter WHO you are, an OEM License is tied to the machine it's frist > installed on. If removed from that particular machine, and you are an OEM, you can install that key to another machine *if* you have a multi-license, so you don't know as much as *you* think you do. I have long ago however use all my keys for my multipack. >>> Bwa ha ha!! What a long-winded excuse so you don't have to admit you >>> were wrong!! ROFL!! [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > don't know as much as *you* think you do. I have long ago however use all > my keys for my multipack. Not if you've passed the machine on with the OS, you can't!! - no matter WHAT happens after that point. SignatureNoel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows) Nil Carborundum Illegitemi http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm http://tinyurl.com/6oztj Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's >>>> Bwa ha ha!! What a long-winded excuse so you don't have to admit you >>>> were wrong!! ROFL!! [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > Not if you've passed the machine on with the OS, you can't!! - no matter > WHAT happens after that point. Did I not say or did you fail to read in my post, that the person that bought the machine from me, didn't want the WinME that was on it, so I took it off and put on the WinXP Pro that they bought? iow, the machine was never sold with the WinME installed. SignatureVIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien /} @###{ ]::::::Dino-Soft Software::::::> \} This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware >>>>> Bwa ha ha!! What a long-winded excuse so you don't have to admit you >>>>> were wrong!! ROFL!! [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > took it off and put on the WinXP Pro that they bought? iow, the machine > was never sold with the WinME installed. If you don't knwo what you said - let me remind you. To quote..... "The system the WinME was on has been sold and that user bought a retail WinXP Pro and I put it on and they let me keep my WinME OEM CD because they had no use for it. I called the user and they sold the machine long time ago because they wanted a better system then a 1Ghz." The CLEAR implication of this is that you passed the machine to the user WITH ME INSTALLED - and the user later installed ME. Nowhere do you mention that YOU installed it, or that you installed it before the machine left your workshop - in fact the clear implication is that the user was doing you a favour by letting you keep the CD. SignatureNoel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows) Nil Carborundum Illegitemi http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm http://tinyurl.com/6oztj Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's >>>>>> Bwa ha ha!! What a long-winded excuse so you don't have to admit you >>>>>> were wrong!! ROFL!! [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > then > a 1Ghz." You sure can NOT read for content can YOU, what part of "The system the WinME was on has been > sold and that user bought a retail WinXP Pro and I put it on " do you NOT > understand? The operative word here is "*WAS*" the machine the WinME *was* on as in NO LONGER on; because I took it off and put on the WinXP pro that they bought; because they did NOT want the WinME that was on it, so the system never left with WinME installd on it; because it *was* removed and WinXP put on in it's place. Any you people say I am a worm wiggler sure, just as much as you or anyone else. > The CLEAR implication of this is that you passed the machine to the user > WITH ME INSTALLED - and the user later installed ME. Nowhere do you > mention that YOU installed it, or that you installed it before the machine > left your workshop - in fact the clear implication is that the user was > doing you a favour by letting you keep the CD. Pure Bull sh.t, what part of : "user bought a retail WinXP Pro and I put it on " do you NOT understand? they bought a WinXP Pro and I put it on, how much plainer can it be? or are you trying to say that I put the XP on over top of the ME? Do you know how confuse you sound? expressly when you say: "The CLEAR implication of this is that you passed the machine to the user WITH ME INSTALLED - and the user later installed ME" you are in that statement trying to say that the people got a machine *with* ME preinstalled and which the later *installed*?? READ!! my post and actually READ it with an open mind instead of one clouded by hear say. SignatureVIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien /} @###{ ]::::::Dino-Soft Software::::::> \} This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware > READ!! my post and actually READ it with an open mind instead of one > clouded by hear say. Nowhere in your quoted text did you say that you did NOT sell them the computer with WinME on it.......nor did you say WHEN you put XP on it. So the logical understanding is that you DID sell them the WinME computer, then later installed XP and they gave you back your ME CD. Comprendez? Quote..... >> "The system the WinME was on has been >> sold and that user bought a retail WinXP Pro and I put it on and they >> >> let me keep my WinME OEM CD because they had no use for it. Re-reading it again, you say you sold that WinME system and that *THAT USER* (of WinME) bought XP Pro later and so on. Worm-wriggler.....stop trying to weasel out of what you said. HF >> READ!! my post and actually READ it with an open mind instead of one >> clouded by hear say. [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > Worm-wriggler.....stop trying to weasel out of what you said. Pure bs, you are the worm wiggler because you mis-read it and won't own up to the mistake, how could WinME and XP both be on the system at the same time?, well even though there are ways of doing that, that however was not the case and when XP is put on a system ME is NO LONGER on the system. they had no need of the ME cd because ME was no longer on the system; because I took ME off and put XP on, you are at last the worse worm wiggle of all SignatureVIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien /} @###{ ]::::::Dino-Soft Software::::::> \} This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware >> Nowhere in your quoted text did you say that you did NOT sell them the >> computer with WinME on it.......nor did you say WHEN you put XP on it. >> So the logical understanding is that you DID sell them the WinME >> computer, then later installed XP and they gave you back your ME CD. >> >> Comprendez? > Pure bs, you are the worm wiggler because you mis-read it and won't >own > up to the mistake, how could WinME and XP both be on the system >at the > same time?, Well, duh!! It is called dual booting....you Dimbulb!! Where you slipped up is when you said they gave you BACK the ME CD. Why would they have it unless they had WinME on the computer....double duh!! Now go away and play with your wannabee virus writing friends!! HF >>> Nowhere in your quoted text did you say that you did NOT sell them the >>> computer with WinME on it.......nor did you say WHEN you put XP on it. [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > HF I am of the mind that you just like to argue even when you KNOW you ARE WRONG. I on the other hand don't care to argue when I know I am right, so nuff said, well at least by my you can throng on all you want. BTW, I have NO wannabee virus writing friends and never have had such. Nor do I have any friends that have ever written a virus nor have I. In fact those that are computer enthusiasts like what I am abhor virus writers; but it is you and others like you that give them their kicks and allow them to flourish; because of you constantly egging them on. Those like 4Q which you admit to liking and such who barley veils his activities behind his saying he is into artificial life and artificial intelligence. When you take sides with the likes of him against someone like me that has only EVER tried to help people and has always tried to sway young programmers from writing harmful software you help continuat the feelings by virus writers that they are sort of like robin hood, when in fact at the very least virus writers are padding the pockets of Antivirus software vendors. SignatureVIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien /} @###{ ]::::::Dino-Soft Software::::::> \} This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware -- VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien /} @###{ ]::::::Dino-Soft Software::::::> \} This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware > [...] those that are computer enthusiasts like what I am Your literacy knows no bounds! > [...] barley veils Is that like barley wine or barley sugar? LOL!! I thought I was on the wrong ng when I saw your "name". Noel, Mike and Mart.....meet Ant who lives on your side of the pond...and takes the mickey out of Soooooge regularly. Luv him for that....grin. And needless to say, it usually goes right over Dimbulb's head!! Cheers....Figgs >> [...] those that are computer enthusiasts like what I am > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Is that like barley wine or barley sugar? Actually *no* it doesn't I just consider the source and ignore it; because I spell the way I want and if the spell checker on my Office 2003 doesn't catch it, then why should I bother. A wiser man that all here once said something like "A small mind can only think of one way to spell a word" I think it was Albert Einstein; but I could be wrong. Ant although he thinks himself the consummate wit, is one of those that won't take the chance of posting something, so he comments on those that do. After all when was the last time you say Ant post anything that was not a comment on what someone else had posted? Besides when he is trying to pick on me he is leaving others alone, so that is ok with me. SignatureVIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien /} @###{ ]::::::Dino-Soft Software::::::> \} This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware > LOL!! I thought I was on the wrong ng when I saw your "name". > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >> >> Is that like barley wine or barley sugar? >> LOL!! I thought I was on the wrong ng when I saw your "name". Hi Heather. It really is my name! >> Noel, Mike and Mart.....meet Ant who lives on your side of the pond...and >> takes the mickey out of Soooooge regularly. Luv him for that....grin. >> And needless to say, it usually goes right over Dimbulb's head!! > Actually *no* it doesn't Actually, yes, it does. > I just consider the source and ignore it; because I spell the way I > want [...] When I see someone write "like what I am", and make a comment, I'm not referring to spelling. > but I could be wrong. You are invariably wrong, or get the wrong end of the stick. Not so long ago I tried to engage you in a technical discussion. You didn't respond properly, missed the point, made an irrelevant sidetrack, and later claimed to be performing some sort of social-engineering trick. To what end, I've no idea, but if it was to make you look like a doofus then you succeeded. > Ant although he thinks himself the consummate wit, is one of those that > won't take the chance of posting something, so he comments on those that do. > After all when was the last time you say Ant post anything that was not a > comment on what someone else had posted? I don't believe I've ever been the originator of a thread in acv or aca-v, so what I say in those groups is always a comment on what was posted. Sometimes it's even on-topic, and offers to-the-point technical advice. I can see three non-followup posts from you since April in acv, none of which are on-topic. In total, there are 525 messages from you in acv on my server, most of which are repetitious off-topic blather. > Besides when he is trying to pick on me he is leaving others alone, > so that is ok with me. I thought you enjoyed the "fun" you were having in acv. My comments on your screeds have never been cruel or nasty. > VIA TITS I like your new sig; but is being a tit on usenet the impression you want to convey? >> VIA TITS > > I like your new sig; but is being a tit on usenet the impression you > want to convey? Probably not - but then he's never succeeded in much anyway, from what I can make out Noel >>> VIA TITS >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Probably not - but then he's never succeeded in much anyway, from what I > can make out <not spell checked just because I don't have to if I don't wish to> I have succeeded in haveing a fulfilling life, married to the same women for over a quarter centuary, my children are honor roll students and dont drink alachol or do drugs. I can say what quite a few sorry souls here can not and that is that I am a truly *happy* man. I have only tried to either help people on usenet, or to try and lead the younger posters out there that may be drawn into wanting to do distructive things into a more constructive use of their time and evolving talent. I could leave off posting to usenet today and never miss it; because I have far better uses for my time. Some here try and brag because they give out free advice to help people fix their comupters. I on the other hand not only do that; but in real life I sit down with users and show them how to fix the problems with their computers. Not a few local pc repair persons have told me that they don't mind that I fix local churche and users pc's for free or just for the cost of the parts I have them go out and buy; but they say they have lost not a few dollars to my showing people how to maintain their pc's because then the next time the user can fix the problem their self. One local user had taken their pc to the same shop over a half dozen times over 2 years to have spyware and malware virus and slow down problems fixed and paid each and ever time. I then educated them on how to do it their self and they have called me several times after fixing their own problem and tell me "You just saved me 75 bucks" I then tell them glad to have helped. Local mom and pop types of pc repair shops charge anywere from 50-100 dollard (depending on which shop) for a simple system wipe and reinstall. Local users are also quite happy when I tell them I can learn them how to fix their problem and (most times) they won't even loose their data and I invarabably get asked why does so and so wipe my system and reinstall to fix the same problem you do without needing to wip the hd. I tell them that most likely the shop they go to just don't want to take the time to keep their data so they simply wipe it and reinstall. But of course all you internet guros will chime in that I am taking food out of the local pc shop owners familys mouth; but I work mostly with those users that can ill aford to pay such prices over and over and over for the same shody work. But as I said, I could leave off posting here (and some will say of course, then quit talking about it and just leave) and be quite happy without offering free advice. The reason I even come to groups like this is because I just don't like it when people think they *own* a news group simply because they have been posting to a piticular group longer then someone else. </not spell checked just because I don't have to if I don't wish to> Signature^^^^^ (@@) -----o00o-(_)-o00o------------- From the Desk of Paul Bryant /} @###{ ]::::::Dino-Soft Software::::::> \} http://www.dino-soft.org ---------------Oooo------------- oooO ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_/ \_) > I have succeeded in haveing a fulfilling life, married to the > same women for over a quarter centuary, Sheeesh, a bigamist as well! George Gee >> I have succeeded in haveing a fulfilling life, married to the >> same women for over a quarter centuary, > > Sheeesh, a bigamist as well! > > George Gee ha ha, and just for ant that thinks things go over my head, I get it that he is saying you can't have a fulfilling life being married to the *same* woman, so ipso facto if I have had a fulfilling life I must have had a mistress or another woman on the side besides my wife. But be advised Ant, anything you post that you think goes over my head, I will just let you wallow in your ignorance believing the lie that I don't get it, that way I get the last and best laugh, and what makes it the best laugh is that it is at your expense. And I know that it will stick in the back of your mind and no matter how much you tell your self that it is going over my head you will always have that tiny bit of doubt and because of my knowing nothing much at all gets past me, I am secure in my knowledge that you are just a bag of hot air. SignatureVIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien /} @###{ ]::::::Dino-Soft Software::::::> \} This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware >>> I have succeeded in haveing a fulfilling life, married to the >>> same women for over a quarter centuary, [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > the *same* woman, so ipso facto if I have had a fulfilling life I must > have had a mistress or another woman on the side besides my wife. But it did go over your head. George's comment had nothing to do with you having a mistress, or whatever. Reread your line ...."married to the same WOMEN" SignatureAdam and Eve - the worlds happiest couple ever. Neither had a mother-in-law. bull hockey >>>> I have succeeded in haveing a fulfilling life, married to the >>>> same women for over a quarter centuary, [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Reread your line ...."married to the same WOMEN" What you on your side of the pond consider the multiple of woman and our women are two entirely different things, we also don't call a flashlight a torch, or the TV the tellie and we certainly don't call the hood of our cars it's bonnet >>>> I have succeeded in haveing a fulfilling life, married to the >>>> same women for over a quarter centuary, [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Reread your line ...."married to the same WOMEN" A prime example of his worm-wriggling!! Even when presented with the absolute 200% proof of his error, he still tries to evade it. Dimbulb will never admit he is wrong. He can't spell in English or in Merkin. Woman = one. WOMEN = more than one. No matter what country you live in, Dimbulb!! You are such a fool!! Take a hike, coderipper. HF > What you on your side of the pond consider the multiple of woman and our > women are two entirely different things, we also don't call a flashlight a [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >> >> Reread your line ...."married to the same WOMEN" yes and neither can you or the other; because when I said I got it about multiple woman you all said it wasn't so, so bugger off and bite me, on second thought don't I don't feel like going to get rabies' shots >A prime example of his worm-wriggling!! Even when presented with the >absolute 200% proof of his error, he still tries to evade it. Dimbulb will [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] >>> >>> Reread your line ...."married to the same WOMEN" I'm on the 'same side of the pond' as you and where I come from: WOMAN equals one adult female WOMEN equals two or more adult females Sheesh. SignatureRichard G. Harper [MVP Shell/User] rgharper@gmail.com * PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups * for the benefit of all. Private mail is usually not replied to. * My website, such as it is ... http://rgharper.mvps.org/ * HELP us help YOU ... http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm > What you on your side of the pond consider the multiple of woman and our > women are two entirely different things, we also don't call a flashlight a > torch, or the TV the tellie and we certainly don't call the hood of our > cars it's bonnet >> "Sugien": >>> I have succeeded in haveing a fulfilling life, married to the >>> same women for over a quarter centuary, >> >> Sheeesh, a bigamist as well! > ha ha, and just for ant that thinks things go over my head, I get it > that he is saying you can't have a fulfilling life being married to > the *same* woman, But that's not what he is saying. Heather was right; you don't get it. > [...] no matter how much you tell your self that it is going over my > head you will always have that tiny bit of doubt No doubt whatsoever. > and because of my knowing nothing much at all [...] That explains it! >>> "Sugien": >>>> I have succeeded in haveing a fulfilling life, married to the [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > But that's not what he is saying. Heather was right; you don't get it. yes I did you are the dense, 0ne oh, dimmest bulb. Just as I said, "he is saying you can't have a fulfilling life being married to the *same* woman" as in married to the same *one* woman, instead of women as in multiple, so there you see my reply went over you pointy head, rofl >> [...] no matter how much you tell your self that it is going over my >> head you will always have that tiny bit of doubt > > No doubt whatsoever. yep, no doubt the you are several cards short of a full deck in more then one department of that pointy head of yours SignatureVIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien /} @###{ ]::::::Dino-Soft Software::::::> \} This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware >>>> "Sugien": >>>>> I have succeeded in haveing a fulfilling life, married to the [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > yes I did you are the dense, 0ne oh, dimmest bulb. Just as I said, "he is > saying you can't have a fulfilling life being married to the *same* woman" He neither said, nor meant that. What you initially said, and his remark, are quoted at the beginning of this post. Re-read carefully, and you might understand. > as in married to the same *one* woman, instead of women as in multiple, so > there you see my reply went over you pointy head, rofl Your reply indicated that you missed the joke entirely, oh self- confessed pointy-headed one: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.comp.virus/msg/db1651ad9532d1b6 So why should I care about anything you have to say about anything? Oh that's right I DON"T, piss off >>>>> "Sugien": >>>>>> I have succeeded in haveing a fulfilling life, married to the [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > confessed pointy-headed one: > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.comp.virus/msg/db1651ad9532d1b6 > So why should I care about anything you have to say about anything? > Oh that's right I DON"T, piss off Oh dear. Sooge's pointy little head just exploded. Embarrassing, isn't it, when you can't climb out of the hole you've dug yourself into. Now what were you saying about wallowing in ignorance, bags of hot air, and last and best laughs? <chortle!>. Yep and I am laughing at you can you not hear me from there? funny I would have thought you could >> So why should I care about anything you have to say about anything? >> Oh that's right I DON"T, piss off [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > what were you saying about wallowing in ignorance, bags of hot air, > and last and best laughs? <chortle!>. >>> VIA TITS >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Probably not - but then he's never succeeded in much anyway, from > what I > can make out<<< So true!! He hasn't worked in years....pretends to be a disabled 'Nam vet, lol. He repaired typewriters in Nam....whoopee. Not many of them on the front lines. Duck.....incoming typewriter key!! Oh yes, before I forget.....over on his "hacker home base", he tried to infer that he has "dark powers" and caused Shane's accident!! Of course, he makes it very vague so he can later deny it, but the numbskulls on there seemed to believe him.....ROFL!! Heather >>>> VIA TITS >>> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > he makes it very vague so he can later deny it, but the numbskulls on > there seemed to believe him.....ROFL!! Your idiocy amazes me! I *pretend* to be a disabled Vietnam vet? You are asinine to the infinite degree. Just for you information *all* firebases had typewriters, who do you think fills out the paperwork when someone dies? or when someone new is sent to the company?. Civilians that have never been in a war zone should keep their mouth shut and be thought a fool where such matter are concerned instead of opening their mouth and removing all doubt. FYI, I rolled a jeep up into an empty ammo bunker and was medivaced was knocked out for 3 days and nights and hospitalized for 2 weeks was offered to be sent home early but because I only had 3 months left and my leaving early would necessitate someone coming to fill my position 3 months early I elected to just stay. Oh and better watch out for my dark powers to strike within 2 weeks j/k? SignatureVIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien /} @###{ ]::::::Dino-Soft Software::::::> \} This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware >>>>> VIA TITS >>>> [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > Oh and better watch out for my dark powers to strike within 2 weeks > j/k? In any event they are not *dark* powers any way, I am a child of the light and a child of God, and not only can my father beat your father at absolutely everything; but my father *created* everything *including YOU* btw, I truly don't have anything against you, or any one else for that matter. The more someone tries to cause me harm or pain the more I try and cause *good* to happen to them in return. I have no need to fight any battles; because I have a father that fights for me even when I don't think it necessary. Signature^^^^^ (@@) -----o00o-(_)-o00o------------- From the Desk of Sugien /} @###{ ]::::::Dino-Soft Software::::::> \} http://www.dino-soft.org ---------------Oooo------------- oooO ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_/ \_) > In any event they are not *dark* powers any way, I am a child of the > light and a child of God, and not only can my father beat your father at > absolutely everything; but my father *created* everything *including YOU* What the ??? If all else fails try Religion? > ...I have no need to fight any > battles; because I have a father that fights for me even when I don't think > it necessary. Which Psalm is that one from? Why not: Psalm 23:4 Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil, for you are with me; your rod and your staff, they comfort me. Or plainly: Psalm 23 Verse 1 The LORD is my shepherd, I will need nothing. Verse 2 He makes me lie down in green fields, he leads me beside quiet waters. Verse 3 He refreshes my heart. For his sake he guides me along paths of goodness. Verse 4 Even though I walk through the valley of darkness, I have nothing to fear, for you are with me; your shepherds staff will comfort me. Verse 5 You prepare a table of food in front of me, even when I am surrounded by my enemies. You anoint my head with oil; my cup overflows. Verse 6 Surely goodness and love will follow me all the days of my life, and I will dwell in God's house forever. The Lord Is My Shepherd. How far do you want to carry this? The Lord probably knows all CD keys... John > > In any event they are not *dark* powers any way, I am a child of > the >> light and a child of God, and not only can my father beat your father at >> absolutely everything; but my father *created* everything *including YOU* > > What the ??? If all else fails try Religion? Pardon me for giggling, John. But Sooooge also plays the *religion card* when he is losing an argument. And he damn near forgot he was supposed to be this fundamentalist type when he talked about his *dark powers* and supposedly threatened me. ROFL!! (but he forgot to capitalize *Father*....oops!!) Couldn't resist.....but perhaps now you folks can see why he drives sane people up the wall on other ng's such as ACV. He lies continually about anything and everything. Cheers...Figgs >> ...I have no need to fight any battles; because I have a father that >> fights for me even when I don't think it necessary. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > John PKB, considering you have never looked ANYTHING up concerning me and have always relied on what others have to say. For instance, I have NEVER repaired a typewriter in Vietnam or any where else. I was a 26T which is electronics; but of course you are NOT interested in the truth only in being right; but you forget that your being right is NOT the truth; because your right is a LIE. >> > In any event they are not *dark* powers any way, I am a child of >> the [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] >> >> John >> > In any event they are not *dark* powers any way, I am a child of >> the [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Pardon me for giggling, John. But Sooooge also plays the *religion card* > when he is losing an argument. And he damn near forgot he was supposed to When truth is used I never loose an argument because I don't lie and I rely on my own research and not hear say or rumors like what you and others do. > be this fundamentalist type when he talked about his *dark powers* and > supposedly threatened me. ROFL!! Other people sometimes think the powers of light are evil, just because the powers of light can be a very frightening thing when you are standing wrong in the power of light. > (but he forgot to capitalize *Father*....oops!!) Oh, gee wiz, I made an error, so what is your point? > Couldn't resist.....but perhaps now you folks can see why he drives sane > people up the wall on other ng's such as ACV. He lies continually about > anything and everything. I only do so when attacked by the likes of you or some one like you that takes the word of a low life over the word of a good person. I will tell the truth every time someone lies and tries to say something that I know to be a lie. I will defend myself when I am maliciously attacked expressly when it is for a no good reason. People in groups like this wonder why there is so much malicious software and virus out there when all they need do is look at the difference in the way people are treated. People like 4Q that openly admit they think people should be allowed to write virus and he also says that he studies and tries to write artificial life and artificial intelligence programs which is a thinly veiled way of saying virus, yet he can attack someone like me and he is believed *prior* to any proof of anything and then it just snow balls. Anyone with an open mind that reads back over the archives of ACV and then ACVA-V will and have agreed with me. I think it is just that people secretly like the darker side of the internet in private while all along saying just the opposite in public for fear of reparations by their pears in public forums such as Usenet. I have ever only wanted to help people and lead young programmers away from virus/malware/malicious types of programs; but those like 4Q and others openly try and lead the young programmer to it are hailed like conquering heroes and I think it stinks and sometimes I even think the net gets what it deserves when one of those young programmers that have been groomed by people like 4Q and others creates and then releases something wicked. > Cheers...Figgs >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >> >> John btw, I have no need of dard powers see this - Romans 12:20 SignatureVIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien /} @###{ ]::::::Dino-Soft Software::::::> \} This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware > > In any event they are not *dark* powers any way, I am a child of > the [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Which Psalm is that one from? Why not: because this is one of those I was referencing: Romans 12:20 Therefore if thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst, give him drink: for in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on his head. iow, no matter what my enemy does to try and hurt me either physically or emotionally or with hurtful words, I do not respond in kind but rather pray for them. You see Heather and others like to play the "I am better then you" and she and others take the words of people like 4Q at face value instead of searching for their self and not only that but after taking the word of such a person as 4Q that attacks the wives and children of those on Usenet when he can't win in an argument any other way; but will join in haranguing I half expected Heather to join him when he was dragging my wife and children's names through the mud when they don't even read or post to Usenet. SignatureVIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien /} @###{ ]::::::Dino-Soft Software::::::> \} This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware > bla..bla..bla... Gibberish and mumbo jumbo... Are you in training to replace Pat Robertson and become leader of the crackpot club? John > What the ??? If all else fails try Religion? [snip] > your rod and your staff, > they comfort me. He gets great comfort from his "rod" ;) http://groups.google.com/group/alt.comp.virus/msg/1d63d4751658694f >>> LOL!! I thought I was on the wrong ng when I saw your "name". > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Actually, yes, it does. says you but your opinion does not amount to a hill of sh.t to me >> I just consider the source and ignore it; because I spell the way I >> want [...] [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > To what end, I've no idea, but if it was to make you look like a > doofus then you succeeded. What I did or did not do in another ng is irrelevant here. One would need to know the whole background as to why I did or did not do in that ng and my reasons for doing such and such, which you do not and did not and still do not >> Ant although he thinks himself the consummate wit, is one of those that >> won't take the chance of posting something, so he comments on those that [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > I don't believe I've ever been the originator of a thread in acv or which is just what I said > aca-v, so what I say in those groups is always a comment on what was > posted. Sometimes it's even on-topic, and offers to-the-point > technical advice. I can see three non-followup posts from you since > April in acv, none of which are on-topic. In total, there are 525 > messages from you in acv on my server, most of which are repetitious > off-topic blather. As I have already stated, that is there, this is here and one has no bearing on the other. I chose to post like what I did, for my own reasons. I like the freedom of Usenet I can post where ever I choose when ever I choose as much as I choose, as on or off topic as I choose, and no amount of blathering by would be moderators can change it. >> Besides when he is trying to pick on me he is leaving others alone, >> so that is ok with me. > > I thought you enjoyed the "fun" you were having in acv. My comments > on your screeds have never been cruel or nasty. Yep I did until my family was attacked, and until pictures of my wife were *STOLEN* from my web page which says doing so is strictly illegal, and then those illegally obtained pictures were used to attack her and I and my children. So I figured any news group that would uphold one of their poster that would stoop to doing such a low life despicable thing was not worth my posting to. But that is that ng and this is this ng are you following me or trying to *stalk* me Ant? I am asking you point blank; because from others comments I can guess up till now you have never posted here, so are you stalking or following me to this ng? >> VIA TITS > > I like your new sig; but is being a tit on usenet the impression you > want to convey? Oh it does help me separate those whose mind may be aligned with the gutter and those that have a open mind which would not even see it as that because they are moral upright regular people that take things at face value for their self and don't rely on rumors innuendo's or hear say. SignatureVIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien /} @###{ ]::::::Dino-Soft Software::::::> \} This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware I installed the ME using my multipack cdkey, and then after finding out that I was wrong about the sulogo.sys promptly formatted the HD. I had erroneously thought that Microsoft had carried over the sulogo.sys from Win98SE; but I have proven to myself that they did not. Now I am wondering why Microsoft chose to go the sulogo.sys with SE but didn't continue it over into ME? But then there is no telling with Microsoft because with XP they took the ability of changing the boot up screen out of the hands of most *common* users because they placed the boot up brag screen in the .exe file ntoskrnl.exe and a user needs to be familiar with using a resource editor to change it. Well that is if they wish to change it their self without relying on third party software that does it for them. I unlike some others here admit when I am in error; but I doubt very much if those that are wrong about what I said about the system I sold *after* removing ME and *after* installing XP on it, will do likewise. SignatureVIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien /} @###{ ]::::::Dino-Soft Software::::::> \} This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware > >>> READ!! my post and actually READ it with an open mind instead of one [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > because I took ME off and put XP on, you are at last the worse worm wiggle > of all Well! - Sugiien admits error! Is this a first?? SignatureNoel Paton (MS-MVP, Win 9x 2002-6) Nil Carborundum Illegitemi http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm http://tinyurl.com/6oztj > I installed the ME using my multipack cdkey, and then after finding out that > I was wrong about the sulogo.sys promptly formatted the HD. I had [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > > because I took ME off and put XP on, you are at last the worse worm wiggle > > of all No, you have only been lead down the garden path of rumor villa and fell hook line and sinker for lies told about me. They would also have you believe that if you use the *free* code samples given away at such web pages as www.planet-source-code.com that you are stealing code and there by a coderipper. I guess they would also say that if a person takes sample code that Microsoft gives away with Visual Basic and then starting off with that free sample you keep adding to it and then you make it into a full application for public consumption that you would be a thief and coderipper because you started out with a *free* code sample. SignatureVIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien /} @###{ ]::::::Dino-Soft Software::::::> \} This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware > Well! - Sugiien admits error! > Is this a first?? [quoted text clipped - 53 lines] >> > wiggle >> > of all If you remove the attribution from the code - then yes, it would make you a code-ripper. If the cap fits.... SignatureNoel Paton (MS-MVP, Win 9x 2002-6) Nil Carborundum Illegitemi http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm http://tinyurl.com/6oztj > No, you have only been lead down the garden path of rumor villa and fell > hook line and sinker for lies told about me. They would also have you [quoted text clipped - 63 lines] > >> > wiggle > >> > of all I always left any authors comments and or name inside the code. I did on occasion if I thought I didn't use enough of an authors code, say less then 3 subs or the likes, then I didn't give them any credit in the about box; but as I said I *always* left the original authors comments and or name in the source code. However it is getting to the point in coding that if a programmer were to give credit in an about box for every helo.world type of code for each and ever subroutine that the about box would be larger then the program it's self. I program sort of Lego Style and have a quite large code snippet library and I simply pull in code for this button or that function instead of having to rewrite the wheel every time I decide to create something I or others might need. SignatureVIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien /} @###{ ]::::::Dino-Soft Software::::::> \} This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware > If you remove the attribution from the code - then yes, it would make you > a [quoted text clipped - 89 lines] >> >> > wiggle >> >> > of all Liar!! You used someone else's code and deliberately took their name out and tried to pass it off as your own.......but got caught at it, coderipper!! >I always left any authors comments and or name inside the code. I did on >occasion if I thought I didn't use enough of an authors code, say less then [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >> code-ripper. >> If the cap fits.... You are the liar, because in that *ONE* instance the fellow that posted the code to planet source code did NOT write the code, and he had his name one it, seeing as how I did NOT know whom wrote it and his name was already on it instead of the actual author I could not see putting his name one it seeing as how he did NOT write it. So I guess in retrospect I could have put it out with NO ONE's name on it; but I chose to put mine. I explained that on my web page and in fact there was a discussion at planet source code about it and EVERYONE there said I was in the right putting my name because NO ONE knew who the original author was and he never step forward. so there :P Any way even in that case I DID leave the fellows name that posted it to planed source code under his name, in the source code; but in the source code I pointed out the dubious part the author may have had in the writing of the code I used; but I did NOT put anyone in the about box as a shout out or anything; because I truly did NOT and still do NOT know who wrote the code originally. You and a few others however not wishing for what ever reason to research it for your self took it at face value what those that had it in for me had to say without your going and even looking at the page I had up explaining all of it, I bet you did NOT even go to the link I posted to PSC at the time when the discussion about the use of that code did you? From the time I first came to ACV and later ACVA-V because I made no bones about what I thought about virus writers people looked for anything to use against me, and then later you and others jumped in on the band wagon WITHOUT looking into it for your self. Then you and others even upheld 4Q when he harangued my wife and children when they don't even read or post to newsgroups. You do realize that some do judge you by the company you keep don't you? Your two friends Laura and 4Q STOLE pictures from my web page that specifically says is ILLEGAL to do so, and then 4Q even went so far as to make a fake pornographic picture using one of the stolen pictures; but you and others just laughed it up and thought that was just great. Personally I think anyone that upholds someone in something that despicable is close to being just a guilty as the one that did the deed. SignatureVIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien /} @###{ ]::::::Dino-Soft Software::::::> \} This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware > Liar!! You used someone else's code and deliberately took their name out > and tried to pass it off as your own.......but got caught at it, [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] >>> code-ripper. >>> If the cap fits.... How would you know he DIDN'T write it?? His name was on it. No different than what you did, is it. > in that *ONE* instance the fellow that posted the code to planet > source code did NOT write the code, and he had his name one it, seeing as > how I did NOT know whom wrote it and his name was already on it instead > of the actual author I could not see putting his name one it seeing as > how he did NOT write it. >> Liar!! You used someone else's code and deliberately took their name out >> and tried to pass it off as your own.......but got caught at it, [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] >>>> code-ripper. >>>> If the cap fits.... Now maybe your are starting to use *your* brain and catch on instead of just being lead by the nose by someone with an axe to grind. Programmer most *all* use sub-routines or sometimes entire programs and then build on them to create a better or more functional program. Microsoft *gives away* sample code which is in effect *complete* mini-programs; but I or anyone with a VB or other compiler can *legally* and *morally* take those sample programs and add to them and even pull in parts of other *free source code* and create a program which they can even sell if they so desire and they do NOT have to give shout outs in about boxes to Microsoft or those other programmers and most do NOT do so; but they do , do as what I did and leave in any comments from the person that they got the code from. > How would you know he DIDN'T write it?? His name was on it. No different > than what you did, is it. [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] >>>>> code-ripper. >>>>> If the cap fits.... http://www.dino-soft.org/programs/ I had forgotten I had even left it up, there is the link the program and it has a link to PSC and you can read all the comments for your self at PSC if you care to learn the TRUTH of the matter. Oh and before you try and lie and say I just put that up anyone that know anything about html and the likes knows how to find out how long a page has been up or last modified > Liar!! You used someone else's code and deliberately took their name out > and tried to pass it off as your own.......but got caught at it, [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] >>> code-ripper. >>> If the cap fits.... I just checked - and in neither Win98 nor in Win98SE is the sulogo.sys file recognised by the boot process - and in neither is the logo/sys file present by default, either (which I must admit, DID surprise me). SignatureNoel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows) Nil Carborundum Illegitemi http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm http://tinyurl.com/6oztj Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's >I installed the ME using my multipack cdkey, and then after finding out >that I was wrong about the sulogo.sys promptly formatted the HD. I had [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] >> system; because I took ME off and put XP on, you are at last the worse >> worm wiggle of all Maybe not on your side of the pond but it sure is here >I just checked - and in neither Win98 nor in Win98SE is the sulogo.sys file >recognised by the boot process - and in neither is the logo/sys file [quoted text clipped - 43 lines] >>> system; because I took ME off and put XP on, you are at last the worse >>> worm wiggle of all Seeing as how you obviously do not believe me here are some others that say the same thing I do: http://www.mdgx.com/newtip3.htm http://www.littleblackdog.com/viewtopic.php?t=1214&start=0 http://forums.pcworld.co.nz/showthread.php?t=12565 http://www.thetechguide.com/forum/lofiversion/index.php/t4913.html http://www.burzurq.com/forum/startup_splash.html I can only say that maybe the splash screen for what ever reason was left out of the over seas versions; because I just asked my son in law and he says the German version likewise does not have it. >I just checked - and in neither Win98 nor in Win98SE is the sulogo.sys file >recognised by the boot process - and in neither is the logo/sys file [quoted text clipped - 43 lines] >>> system; because I took ME off and put XP on, you are at last the worse >>> worm wiggle of all I was using MSDN versions, which are US Retail. It's possible that your ripper friends were using OEM tailored versions - or that your use of Google exceeds your comprehension of text. 1) http://forums.pcworld.co.nz/showthread.php?t=12565 specifically says that sulogo.sys does not exist (and neither Win98 nor Win98SE have a Win98_19.CAB file) 2) http://www.mdgx.com/newtip3.htm specifically states that the sulogo.sys file is the one used at the final stage of the install - AND MUST BE RENAMED to logo.sys before use. 3) http://www.littleblackdog.com/viewtopic.php?t=1214&start=0 - also states that the file must be renamed to logo.sys to work 4) http://www.thetechguide.com/forum/lofiversion/index.php/t4913.html - also states that the file must be renamed to logo.sys to work 5) http://www.burzurq.com/forum/startup_splash.html - says " I found the startup splash but only in the cabs. It's named sulogo.sys rather than logo.sys." - but elsewhere explains that you need the logo.sys to show a tailored splash. - it also links to http://www.annoyances.org/exec/show/article02-011 , where the exact procedure for creating a personalised splash screen is explained rather well. Wriggle out of that! SignatureNoel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows) Nil Carborundum Illegitemi http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm http://tinyurl.com/6oztj Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's which are US Retail! > Seeing as how you obviously do not believe me here are some others that > say the same thing I do: [quoted text clipped - 56 lines] >>>> system; because I took ME off and put XP on, you are at last the worse >>>> worm wiggle of all Hey Dimbulb..... I see you ignored this post wherein Noel PROVED that you are totally WRONG with regard to *sulogo.sys*!!! How about it? You are always saying you will admit when you are wrong.....well, you are WRONG!! Bwa ha ha....caught lying once again....worm-wriggler!! Heather >I was using MSDN versions, which are US Retail. > [quoted text clipped - 82 lines] >>>>> longer on the system; because I took ME off and put XP on, you are at >>>>> last the worse worm wiggle of all Not about second edition, I see he did not post back after I poster several links showing the same thing I said that on WinSe it is sulogo.sys and NOT logo.sys. The links show it and if you don't wish to believe several links that say the same thing as me, just because they agree with me, well that just goes to show what a tiny brain and how immature you are > Hey Dimbulb..... > [quoted text clipped - 95 lines] >>>>>> longer on the system; because I took ME off and put XP on, you are at >>>>>> last the worse worm wiggle of all You are such a liar!! You did NOT post anything that said that. Now piss off and go bug some other news group, coderipper. And I would NEVER believe anything you say coz you wouldn't know the truth if it jumped up and bit you....dickhead!! HF > Not about second edition, I see he did not post back after I poster > several links showing the same thing I said that on WinSe it is sulogo.sys [quoted text clipped - 102 lines] >>>>>>> was no longer on the system; because I took ME off and put XP on, >>>>>>> you are at last the worse worm wiggle of all We shall see, hmmm what is left now on the 2 weeks? about 10 days and counting, are you already starting to feel sick? had any near misses in your vehicle? if not you will; because well, just because I don't have any powers doesn't mean it won't happen to you! but you of course (well if you are still able that is) won't come back and tell like what Shane did, oh and things may be getting worse for a few others, funny how those that harangue me get the short end of the stick isn't it! > You are such a liar!! You did NOT post anything that said that. Now piss > off and go bug some other news group, coderipper. [quoted text clipped - 111 lines] >>>>>>>> was no longer on the system; because I took ME off and put XP on, >>>>>>>> you are at last the worse worm wiggle of all That's strange - since I comprehensively ripped apart your (so-called) proofs in the very post that you responded to, below! .... or are you saying that somehow that the post you are talking about never made it to the MS servers? If so - where is it visible? SignatureNoel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows) Nil Carborundum Illegitemi http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm http://tinyurl.com/6oztj Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's > Not about second edition, I see he did not post back after I poster > several links showing the same thing I said that on WinSe it is sulogo.sys [quoted text clipped - 102 lines] >>>>>>> was no longer on the system; because I took ME off and put XP on, >>>>>>> you are at last the worse worm wiggle of all BS, and you know it, what the difference is , is that on your side of the pond you government or for some other reason M$ didn't even include the splash screen and had it deleted. On this side no matter what you try and say I know the truth of the matte and here in the US of A, in Win98SE it was and is sulogo.sys and NOT logo.sys. So bite me; because you are wrong about Win98SE over here > That's strange - since I comprehensively ripped apart your (so-called) > proofs in the very post that you responded to, below! [quoted text clipped - 109 lines] >>>>>>>> was no longer on the system; because I took ME off and put XP on, >>>>>>>> you are at last the worse worm wiggle of all Listen, Sugien - I USED AN MSDN DISK - which is US retail! What's your excuse? SignatureNoel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows) Nil Carborundum Illegitemi http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm http://tinyurl.com/6oztj Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's > BS, and you know it, what the difference is , is that on your side of the > pond you government or for some other reason M$ didn't even include the [quoted text clipped - 117 lines] >>>>>>>>> because ME was no longer on the system; because I took ME off and >>>>>>>>> put XP on, you are at last the worse worm wiggle of all About the only other thing I can think of is that I used a OEM version, and I think that may be the difference; because it was and still is a *real* OEM Win98SE and not a bootleg; because I had a multipack of 200 which I installed on customers pc's back before I had to close my shop due to health concerns. I became completely physically disabled in 1991; but continued to work part time in my and my partners shop until I could no longer stand the physical pain even with massive amounts of pain medication. So I guess I could be because of using an OEM version; because I have never have installed a retail version of Win98SE I only installed to new pc's we built or used customers OEM version that came with their PC or the OEM versions on recovery CD's. Oh btw, Heather, you never did admit to your error about Microsoft giving away Office 2003 at the TS2 events. I guess you will say something about your not remembering how you said I could not have an Office 2003 because Microsoft doesn't just *give away* expensive software. Or will you try and wiggle and say that you were only talking about Microsoft not giving *me* Office 2003 at a TS2 event. I still get a chuckle knowing that it had to irk you to no end that I got a FREE Office 2003 from Microsoft; because other wise you would not have ranted so much about how I could not have possibly received *free* Office 2003 from Microsoft. I have in fact received quite a lot of FREE software from Microsoft by being *invited* by Microsoft to attend launchings and events. I still have my *free* Win2K T-Shirt shrink wrapped to look like a flying window from the Win2K launch event where I told Microsoft about the con\con bug, and NO I don't claim to have been the *first* to find it; but I have been given credit for reporting it. I guess that some of the others that found it didn't want to report it because they were having to much fun with it at users expense. Much like what using +++ATH0 will do to about 50% of the dial up modems out there. SignatureVIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien /} @###{ ]::::::Dino-Soft Software::::::> \} This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware > Listen, Sugien - > I USED AN MSDN DISK - which is US retail! [quoted text clipped - 122 lines] >>>>>>>>>> cd because ME was no longer on the system; because I took ME off >>>>>>>>>> and put XP on, you are at last the worse worm wiggle of all ....faint sounds of violins playing in the background....to accompany the never ending worm-wriggling of the Dimbulb!! Sooooge.....you are MENTALLY disabled, not physically. That is just a dodge to collect welfare!! I didn't make any errors re your allegedly having MS Office 2003. You still can't spell, so obviously you don't have it. However, I do have a free copy of it on this machine. Bill Gates likes me, lol. OH........are those 200 copies of Win98SE the ones you said you sent to New Orleans to help out in the Katrina aftermath? Like, duh.....money or food would have been better, but I assume you were lying about that as well. The truth is a concept you are not familiar with!! HF > About the only other thing I can think of is that I used a OEM > version, and I think that may be the difference; because it was and still [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] >> >> What's your excuse? You must be having a senior moment; because (and you can check google) I said win95 not win98. I do use my spelling checker from my *free copy* of Office 2003; but I don't care if you believe me or not, I just know it has to irk you to no limit that I DO have it and that is why you insist I don't. Just ask your so called friends that are associated (lol, I bet) with Microsoft about the TS2 events; but of course you won't because you don't want to be *proven* wrong. I could simply scan in the cd's and the package they came it; but as I said the only thing about the office 2003 that is important in this thread is your refusal to believe it and that gives me considerable pleasure knowing how much it gratis against you because other wise you would simply ask someone that knows about how Microsoft gives away free Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003 with One note and business contact manager. It does however say on it in a yellow sticker "Promotional sample Not for Resale"; but it is still a FULL *real* Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003, I take it that yours is only the students or the regular retail and not the professional edition and that must irk you even more, I laugh at you; because of your refusal to believe it just because they gave it to me and not you. Oh and btw, I have *never* been on welfare, and there is nothing wrong with being on social security disability, and if you think you can fool the social security doctors then you must have never known anyone that is drawing disability from the government; because MRI's and CAT scans and the likes can NOT be fooled . That tells me you hold people with disabilities in a low regard and that in and of it's self makes me *very* **VERY** Sorry for you , and indeed for anyone that even *knows* you > ....faint sounds of violins playing in the background....to accompany the > never ending worm-wriggling of the Dimbulb!! [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] >>> >>> What's your excuse? Inline, dickbrain.......... > You must be having a senior moment; because (and you can check google) I > said win95 not win98. Whoopee doo.......you sent 200 copies of Win95 to the Katrina survivors?? Bet they were thrilled!! (coasters, anyone?) Of course, you are lying, as usual. But that is to be expected. I do use my spelling checker from my *free copy* of > Office 2003; but I don't care if you believe me or not, But you DO care........you keep droning on and on and on about it!! And you obviously can't be using an English spellchecker, judging by all the errors in your post. Perhaps it is a Russian or Chinese one, lol. >>> I take it that yours is only the students or the regular retail and not >>> the professional edition and that must irk you even more, I laugh at >>> you; because of your refusal to believe it just because they gave it to >>> me and not you.<<< Wrong again, Dimbulb........I just checked and mine is the FULL PROFESSIONAL OFFICE 2003 with 17 different applications...and it was FREE!! So bite me!! > Oh and btw, there is nothing wrong with being on social security > > disability...(crap snipped). Not if you are truly disabled. And you have yet to say how and why, other than moan on about meds and alleged pain.........ya lazy sod!! So you have lived off the taxpayers for 15 years?? Why not get a job instead of spending hours every day on Usenet bugging people who are obviously your superiors. Coderipper. HF.......and I repeat in case you missed it.....I have the Professional Version of Office 2003.....got that? >> ....faint sounds of violins playing in the background....to accompany the >> never ending worm-wriggling of the Dimbulb!! [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] >> >> HF . I became completely physically disabled in 1991; >>> but continued to work part time in my and my partners shop until I could >>> no longer stand the physical pain even with massive amounts of pain >>> medication. Inline.... SignatureNoel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows) Nil Carborundum Illegitemi http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm http://tinyurl.com/6oztj Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's > About the only other thing I can think of is that I used a OEM > version, and I think that may be the difference; Purest BS - this is a wiggle of the first order! because it was and still is a *real* > OEM Win98SE and not a bootleg; because I had a multipack of 200 which I > installed on customers pc's back before I had to close my shop due to [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > installed to new pc's we built or used customers OEM version that came > with their PC or the OEM versions on recovery CD's. The multipacks from MS do NOT vary the install or anything else from the reatail build - except for the Product Key acceptance > Oh btw, Heather, you never did admit to your error about Microsoft > giving away Office 2003 at the TS2 events. I guess you will say something > about your not remembering how you said I could not have an Office 2003 > because Microsoft doesn't just *give away* expensive software. MS do give away software - for one of a number of reasons - I have no knowledge of the particular event you claim, but the 'usual procedure' is that at such events they will give away time-bombed software, except to certain pre-identified persons/corporations. Or will you > try and wiggle and say that you were only talking about Microsoft not > giving *me* Office 2003 at a TS2 event. I still get a chuckle knowing [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] |
Enable EMail Alerts
Start New Thread
Reply to this Message