Not really. WMC uses the "TOC" from each track to identify what album that
it comes from, and the title to decide what to play. This is to solve the
problem of the infamous "Greatest Hits" album. You don't want WMC to
combine all of your 'greatest hits' albums into one mega-album.
Some of this should get better in the Vista version of WMC.
Sorry,

Signature
Alan Ludwig
Software Design Engineer
Windows Media Devices Group
Microsoft Corp.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Hmmmm... I can understand your intentions here, but the experience is
different from WMP, which seems able to figure this out (using Album Artist).
It's a little frustrating to get two different results from the same source,
espcially using an attribute that the user cannot control. Thanks for letting
me know the reason it's happening at least, I'll look forward to Vista
addressing this difference in some way.
Paul
> Not really. WMC uses the "TOC" from each track to identify what album that
> it comes from, and the title to decide what to play. This is to solve the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Sorry,
Chadlington - 29 Jan 2006 19:35 GMT
Perhaps you also need to include one set of track numbers, across the whole
set of files? i.e. continue numbering tracks on the second CD sequentially
from the first?
Just a thought....
> Hmmmm... I can understand your intentions here, but the experience is
> different from WMP, which seems able to figure this out (using Album Artist).
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> >
> > Sorry,
Starless - 30 Jan 2006 03:40 GMT
thanks for the idea - I've renamed track numbers by adding a disc number
(101, 102, 201, etc.) but no difference. Bottom line, WMC should
differentiate albums the way WMP does: by album artist. Anything but using an
uneditable tag.
> Perhaps you also need to include one set of track numbers, across the whole
> set of files? i.e. continue numbering tracks on the second CD sequentially
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> > >
> > > Sorry,