> > I must be stupid, because I am still having a problem.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Due to poor design and terminology throughout WMP, see same article.
> I still feel stupid, because I do not see any place to ENTER "Contributing
> Artist". It is not one of the library fields, and isn't in the Advanced Tag
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> that doesn't tell me where to enter the iinfo. Clicking on "My Playlists"
> "New" does nothing.
If you check my table in the article I referenced, you get a guide as to
where to go. WMP has completely stuffed up any attempt at consistent
terminology, so "Contributing Artist" is labelled differently in nearly
every part of the UI.
> I do gather that trying to enter multiple artists under the Artist name is
> now useless as there are unpredictable results.
Depends what you mean by "Artist" (see above).
> As someone who has been a Product Manager for many software products from
> very major companies, I cannot believe that Microsoft released such garbage.
Heck I worked on about 8 Microsoft products and consider it a total
embarrassment. There are a number of areas which contravene Microsoft's
own long-published guidelines.
fabiospark - 03 Jan 2005 17:45 GMT
Please check this:
I put three different names in Contributing artist field separated by a
semicolon (;) "First name; Second name; Third name"
Ok, now I can see three nodes in the Contributing artist tree on the left
pane. Clever, I say.
If I create an autoplaylist with just one name - whichever - I can find
those tracks.
Now I want to create a playlist to find all the tracks with the first two
names I put in the field so I do:
"Field Contributing artist contains: "First name"
"Field Contributing artist contains: "Second name"
How many tracks I will find? No one!
Then I try putting "First name/ Second name/ third name" instead of using (;).
Now I can see just the node "First name/ Second name/ Third name" in the
tree but when I create the autoplaylist like the one above I can find the
tracks.
Does anybody know a way to save the clever behaviour of the tree using (;)
but without having to loose the autoplaylist retrieving feature?
Thanks in advance.
P.S.
Does any field work in the same way? I mean, with (;)?
Thanks again.
> > I still feel stupid, because I do not see any place to ENTER "Contributing
> > Artist". It is not one of the library fields, and isn't in the Advanced Tag
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> embarrassment. There are a number of areas which contravene Microsoft's
> own long-published guidelines.
Mike Williams [MVP] - 03 Jan 2005 23:43 GMT
> Please check this:
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> How many tracks I will find? No one!
Same result for me. Fails for both "contains" and "is".
That's kind of consistent with the bug in having multiple search clauses
on different fields looking for the same name. Item #34 here:
http://msmvps.com/thinice/articles/16084.aspx
I'm starting to see why delaying WinFS integration in Longhorn is a good
thing since WMP library features represent similar features to what
would be found generically in the Windows file-system in the future.
> Then I try putting "First name/ Second name/ third name" instead of using (;).
> Now I can see just the node "First name/ Second name/ Third name" in the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Does anybody know a way to save the clever behaviour of the tree using (;)
> but without having to loose the autoplaylist retrieving feature?
The closest you might get it to do the query as
Music in my Library
Containing Artist1
+
Music in my Library
Containing Artist2
That gets you the union of the entries, not the desired intersection.
Intersecting filter cases don't appear to have been tested.