Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsWindows VistaWindows XPWindows MeWindows 98Windows 95Virtual PCInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressWindows MediaSecurity
Related Topics
MS Server ProductsMS OfficePC HardwareMore Topics ...

Windows Forum / Windows Vista / Games / December 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Bug in Games Explorer on Start Menu - Vista RTM

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
David Wright - 02 Dec 2006 08:31 GMT
Using Vista RTM, I cannot open any of my games (chess titans, solitaire,
minesweeper, etc.) from the Games Explorer on the start menu ('Games' on the
righthand side of the start menu).  When I select a game to play, I get an
error message box saying:

"This file does not have a program associated with it for performing this
action. Create an association in Set Associations control panel."

However, when I go into 'All Programs -> Games', and start the games from
there, no problems.

I have looked at the Set Associations control panel, and I don't see
anything applicable.  How can I get the Games to play from the Games Explorer?
Paul Smith - 02 Dec 2006 16:42 GMT
Have you installed any software or is this fresh out of the box?

Signature

Paul Smith,
   Yeovil, UK.
Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User.
http://www.windowsresource.net/
Get ready for Windows Vista: http://www.windowsvista.com/getready/

*Remove nospam. to reply by e-mail*

> Using Vista RTM, I cannot open any of my games (chess titans, solitaire,
> minesweeper, etc.) from the Games Explorer on the start menu ('Games' on
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> anything applicable.  How can I get the Games to play from the Games
> Explorer?
David Wright - 02 Dec 2006 22:05 GMT
This has been happening since the installation of RTM.  It's a clean install,
not an upgrade.  To answer your question though, I have installed other
software since then, but this was apparent before that.
Jane C - 02 Dec 2006 23:27 GMT
Have you done any tweaking?  Such as removing the shortcut arrows?

Signature

Jane, not plain ;) 64 bit enabled :-)
Batteries not included.  Braincell on vacation ;-)

> This has been happening since the installation of RTM.  It's a clean
> install,
> not an upgrade.  To answer your question though, I have installed other
> software since then, but this was apparent before that.
David Wright - 03 Dec 2006 00:00 GMT
Jane, thank you, you hit the nail right on the head.  It seems that removing
the shortcut arrows prevents the Games from opening correctly.  As soon as I
put the shortcut arrows back, everything ran well.  Do you know how I can
remove the shortcut arrows without diminishing usabililty?
Jane C - 03 Dec 2006 01:33 GMT
So far no luck removing those arrows without stuffing other things up.  I've
learned to live with them ;-)

Signature

Jane, not plain ;) 64 bit enabled :-)
Batteries not included.  Braincell on vacation ;-)

> Jane, thank you, you hit the nail right on the head.  It seems that
> removing
> the shortcut arrows prevents the Games from opening correctly.  As soon as
> I
> put the shortcut arrows back, everything ran well.  Do you know how I can
> remove the shortcut arrows without diminishing usabililty?
David Wright - 04 Dec 2006 04:10 GMT
Oh well, thanks for your help.  :)

> So far no luck removing those arrows without stuffing other things up.  I've
> learned to live with them ;-)
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> > put the shortcut arrows back, everything ran well.  Do you know how I can
> > remove the shortcut arrows without diminishing usabililty?
David Wright - 23 Dec 2006 01:00 GMT
Jane -
Just an update, using the app found at
http://www.frameworkx.com/frameworkx/contentblogdetail.aspx?blog=57&id=531 ,
I am able to remove or change the shortcut arrows without any ill
side-effects (that I have seen yet)  ;^)

> So far no luck removing those arrows without stuffing other things up.  I've
> learned to live with them ;-)
Jane C - 23 Dec 2006 01:10 GMT
Thanks, David, I will check that out :)

Signature

Jane, not plain ;) 64 bit enabled :-)
Batteries not included.  Braincell on vacation ;-)

> Jane -
> Just an update, using the app found at
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>> I've
>> learned to live with them ;-)
Jeff - 23 Dec 2006 02:37 GMT
David,

EXCELLENT find-woohoo!!!
bye bye arrows!!!!
works great!!

Yup Jane,
no arrows no mo!!!

Jeff

> Jane -
> Just an update, using the app found at
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>> I've
>> learned to live with them ;-)
Colin Barnhorst - 23 Dec 2006 03:05 GMT
What's up with the aversion to arrows?  This isn't the Little Big Horn, you
know.

> David,
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Jeff
Jeff - 23 Dec 2006 03:30 GMT
Colin,

   After I found the light of QL,
don't like much on the desktop
plus the smaller blue ones; fit the Vista theme more than the default ones,
and I tried those too

> What's up with the aversion to arrows?  This isn't the Little Big Horn,
> you know.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>>
>> Jeff
Jane C - 23 Dec 2006 03:41 GMT
LOL!  It's just that, well, they are rather large.  Someone goes to the
trouble of creating a lovely icon, and then it gets a huge blob of an arrow
dumped on top of it.  The smaller arrow is much better.  No arrow even more
so ;-)

Signature

Jane, not plain ;) 64 bit enabled :-)
Batteries not included.  Braincell on vacation ;-)

> What's up with the aversion to arrows?  This isn't the Little Big Horn,
> you know.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>>
>> Jeff
David Wright - 23 Dec 2006 03:42 GMT
I don't know if that question was specifically directed towards Jeff, but
IMO, the overall look just looks cleaner without the shortcut arrows.  No
real aversion to them.

> What's up with the aversion to arrows?  This isn't the Little Big Horn,
> you know.
Colin Barnhorst - 23 Dec 2006 04:25 GMT
No, it wasn't aimed at anybody in particular.  I use the desktop for
downloads and lots of download icons look the same as the installed shortcut
if the arrow is removed so I don't like to do it.  Adobe Reader, AVG,
Diskeeper all are the same without the arrow.  It's no trick to check before
I move the installers off to my installers folder on an external drive, but
I just like the arrows.

>I don't know if that question was specifically directed towards Jeff, but
>IMO, the overall look just looks cleaner without the shortcut arrows.  No
>real aversion to them.
>
>> What's up with the aversion to arrows?  This isn't the Little Big Horn,
>> you know.
Jeff - 23 Dec 2006 04:33 GMT
arrows?
who needs um
not this born again QL'er
Happy Holidays!!

Jeff

> No, it wasn't aimed at anybody in particular.  I use the desktop for
> downloads and lots of download icons look the same as the installed
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>>> What's up with the aversion to arrows?  This isn't the Little Big Horn,
>>> you know.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.