Shouldn’t there be two groups? “Vista 32-bit Hardware” and “Vista 64-bit
Hardware” . . .
Greetings all,
Shouldn’t there be two groups? I mean after all, the two operating system’s
hardware-driver-requirements are not compatible.
It seems a natural to me.
Why should 32-bit system users be forced to dredge through 64-bit postings?
And vice-versa.
Just my 2¢ worth,
- Stan
Colin Barnhorst - 12 May 2008 15:13 GMT
Why? They are not different operating systems.
> Shouldn’t there be two groups? “Vista 32-bit Hardware” and “Vista 64-bit
> Hardware” . . .
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> - Stan
John Barnett MVP - 12 May 2008 15:44 GMT
I have to agree with Colin. The only difference between the two is hardware
architecture other than that the OS is exactly the same.

Signature
--
John Barnett MVP
Associate Expert
Windows Desktop Experience
Web: http://xphelpandsupport.mvps.org
Web: http://vistasupport.mvps.org
The information in this mail/post is supplied "as is". No warranty of any
kind, either expressed or implied, is made in relation to the accuracy,
reliability or content of this mail/post. The Author shall not be liable for
any direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damages arising out of the
use of, or inability to use, information or opinions expressed in this
mail/post..
> Shouldn’t there be two groups? “Vista 32-bit Hardware” and “Vista 64-bit
> Hardware” . . .
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> - Stan