Windows Forum / Windows Vista / Performance and Maintainance / November 2006
Full backup / restore
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Alice - 26 Nov 2006 10:29 GMT Is it normal that if you do a full backup and a restore from the Backup and Restore Center that your Windows Update history is empty and all automatic and manual Restore Points are gone? My feeling is it shouldn't be that way?
Rick Rogers - 26 Nov 2006 14:06 GMT Hi Alice,
If you are referring to the Complete PC Backup, then that is an image backup akin to many of the better backup solutions available in the third party software market, so you would only get back that which existed at the time the image was created. In essence, the restoration processes wipes the existing, damaged installation and replaces it with the image previously backed up.
 Signature Best of Luck,
Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/ Windows help - www.rickrogers.org
> Is it normal that if you do a full backup and a restore from the Backup > and > Restore Center that your Windows Update history is empty and all automatic > and manual Restore Points are gone? My feeling is it shouldn't be that > way? Alice - 26 Nov 2006 15:33 GMT Yes, that's what I'm referring to. The truth is, it was a complete functional system that I backed up and immediately restored (part of my testing of Vista functionality). So there was no 'damaged' installation. That's why I was surprised to see that all System Restore points were gone and also the Windows Update history was empty. Since it is an image backup, I would expect those to be preserved.
Rick Rogers - 26 Nov 2006 16:33 GMT Hi Alice,
My understanding is that they are not included because it is assumed that the system is functioning correctly at the time of the backup creation. The backup is the means of restoration to a functioning system, one would not need to roll it back a functioning system or uninstall an update.
 Signature Best of Luck,
Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/ Windows help - www.rickrogers.org
> Yes, that's what I'm referring to. The truth is, it was a complete > functional [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > expect > those to be preserved. Alice - 26 Nov 2006 17:22 GMT > My understanding is that they are not included because it is assumed that > the system is functioning correctly at the time of the backup creation. The > backup is the means of restoration to a functioning system, one would not > need to roll it back a functioning system or uninstall an update. So it is *not* a full image backup like you said previously?
Suppose I made a backup yesterday. Today something goes wrong with my PC and I restore it back to yesterday. Why am I not able to see the Windows Updates that I installed up to yesterday? They *are* installed on my PC.
Also, why cannot I go back to a restore point of three days ago after the restore? I *could* if nothing happened today but since I restored I cannot? Isn't a full image restore supposed to bring the PC back to a state *identical* to the time of backup?
Sorry, this doesn't make sence to me. Do 3rd party solutions behave similarly?
Rick Rogers - 26 Nov 2006 18:40 GMT Hi Alice,
More acurately, it's a system image, whereas many third party solutions do a partition/volume image. In the interest of space and expediancy, only that which matters is backed up.
 Signature Best of Luck,
Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/ Windows help - www.rickrogers.org
>> My understanding is that they are not included because it is assumed that >> the system is functioning correctly at the time of the backup creation. [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > Sorry, this doesn't make sence to me. Do 3rd party solutions behave > similarly? Alice - 26 Nov 2006 19:21 GMT > only that which matters is backed up. According to whom? Obviously, this is where we disagree. ;-) I can see situations where one would need to go back to a previous restore point even after restoring a backup first.
Actually, I wonder if it is really working now as it was intended. Is it documented somewhere that these things are left out on purpose?
Rick Rogers - 26 Nov 2006 20:25 GMT Hi,
I can't find any publications (white papers) on this feature yet. I can only relate what I know from experience and input during the beta.
 Signature Best of Luck,
Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/ Windows help - www.rickrogers.org
>> only that which matters is backed up. > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Actually, I wonder if it is really working now as it was intended. Is it > documented somewhere that these things are left out on purpose? Alice - 27 Nov 2006 06:38 GMT > I can't find any publications (white papers) on this feature yet. I can only > relate what I know from experience and input during the beta. OK, we'll wait. Thanks for your comments.
Jill Zoeller [MSFT] - 27 Nov 2006 18:53 GMT Rick, thanks for jumping in here and sharing information from the beta. I have a couple answers for you from the development team:
1. Windows Updates -- the update history, the updated binaries, etc. should all be restored completely intact. In other words, if you go to Windows Update and ask for a list of installed updates, the list should be the same right before you do the backup, and right after you do the restore. Is this not what you are seeing?
2. Restore Points -- unfortunately, restore points cannot be preserved in the backup. This has to do with the fact that a Complete PC Backup image is made from a shadow copy, which itself contains the previous shadow copies (restore points). However, as part of the shadow copy backup process, we sometimes need to modify the shadow copy to delete files (for TxF and possibly other reasons), and that invalidates the older shadow copies within the context of that shadow copy.
 Signature This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Want to learn more about Windows Server file and storage technologies? Visit our team blog at http://blogs.technet.com/filecab/default.aspx.
>> I can't find any publications (white papers) on this feature yet. I can >> only >> relate what I know from experience and input during the beta. > > OK, we'll wait. Thanks for your comments. Alice - 27 Nov 2006 20:55 GMT Hi Jill,
Thanks for the clarification. To remove all doubts, I was not talking about the beta but I'm running Build 6000.
So, if I understand correctly, it is normal that restore points are not in the backup because of technical reasons, nevertheless the Windows Update history should be included.
Ok, perhaps I will test it once more but since I pretty much have a 'final' install of Vista right now, I prefer not to experiment for a while. Maybe someone else jumps in with experiences.
Jill Zoeller [MSFT] - 28 Nov 2006 19:23 GMT You are correct.
We've been blogging about popular questions regarding our backup tools. You might find our blog useful: http://blogs.technet.com/filecab/default.aspx.
> Hi Jill, > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > install of Vista right now, I prefer not to experiment for a while. Maybe > someone else jumps in with experiences. Alice - 28 Nov 2006 20:23 GMT Thanks Jill, very interesting blog.
> You are correct. > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > install of Vista right now, I prefer not to experiment for a while. Maybe > > someone else jumps in with experiences.
|
|
|