Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsWindows VistaWindows XPWindows MeWindows 98Windows 95Virtual PCInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressWindows MediaSecurity
Related Topics
MS Server ProductsMS OfficePC HardwareMore Topics ...

Windows Forum / Windows Vista / Performance and Maintainance / December 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Speed differences between 32-bit and 64-bit Vista?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Phillip Pi - 28 Dec 2006 20:34 GMT
Hi.

Since I installed both 32-bit and 64-bit Vista Ultimate Edition on my
old test machine (ASUS K8V SE Deluxe, Athlon 64 3200+ [754 CPU], 512 MB
of RAM, SATA HDD, etc.), I notice the speeds are identical. I can't see
and feel any improvements. I did install the ATI Radeon 9600 AIW drivers
to help the video speed, but I just don't see the speed differences. Am
I expecting too much or missing something? I don't have any other
program installed so far. It's just a bare Vista with the latest ATI/AMD
video drivers from ati.com/amd.com.

Thank you in advance. :)
Signature

Phillip Pi
Senior Software Quality Assurance Analyst
ISP/Symantec Online Services, Consumer Business Unit
Symantec Corporation
www.symantec.com
-----------------------------------------------------
Email: phillip_pi@symantec.comSYMC (remove SYMC to reply by e-mail)
-----------------------------------------------------
Please do NOT e-mail me for technical support. DISCLAIMER: The views
expressed in this posting are mine, and do not necessarily reflect the
views of my employer. Thank you.

Dustin - 28 Dec 2006 23:55 GMT
There will not be much, if any, speed differences for general use.
64-bit does not mean double the performance of a 32-bit system. It
allows the software to address more memory, and at a larger chunk at
a time.

With a large database or server, a 64-bit CPU and OS makes more sense,
and will notice a small increase in speed.
Richard Urban - 29 Dec 2006 11:36 GMT
If you run CPU intensive programs, such as rendering video or working with
Photoshop, you will see a difference (assuming that the programs that are
written to 64 bit standards). Not many programs are now at that stage in
their development. The developers have been holding off, waiting to see if
the public demands such. Also, there are some programs that will just not
see much benefit by porting them to 64 bit.

Also, many/most companies will not want to have two versions of every
program they sell. The companies will likely hold off till Vista 64 bit has
proliferated the market.

Signature

Regards,

Richard Urban
Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User
(For email, remove the obvious from my address)

Quote from George Ankner:
If you knew as much as you think you know,
You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!

> Hi.
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Thank you in advance. :)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.