Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsWindows VistaWindows XPWindows MeWindows 98Windows 95Virtual PCInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressWindows MediaSecurity
Related Topics
MS Server ProductsMS OfficePC HardwareMore Topics ...

Windows Forum / Windows Vista / Security / April 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Virus from camera?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
BalRocket61 - 22 Mar 2007 04:41 GMT
Can you get a virus from importing photos from a digital camera?
We had a Trojan Pop up the other day when we imported some photos from a
concord digital camera.
Ever time we opened the windows photo gallery from that certain user, the
Trojan would come up and Macaffee could not quarentine it. I think I deleted
it when I deleted the Picture files? I have ran 2 scans since and it has not
showed up.
Tom - 22 Mar 2007 05:06 GMT
It could be a false positive. I bought and downloaded a program on the
internet and it stated that I might get a warning of a trojan and to ignore
it. It was a known problem.
BalRocket61 - 22 Mar 2007 05:24 GMT
That Very well could be. I tried to find the file that it gave as the
infested file and I could not locate it. I even ran three different
Anti-Virus programs and they did not locate it?..... Thanks for the
post......It could very well be that!

> It could be a false positive. I bought and downloaded a program on the
> internet and it stated that I might get a warning of a trojan and to ignore
> it. It was a known problem.
Jesper - 22 Mar 2007 18:05 GMT
Was the trojan bloodhound.exploit.13? I think that's a false positive from
Symantec Anti Virus. Others have reported the same thing.

>       That Very well could be. I tried to find the file that it gave as the
> infested file and I could not locate it. I even ran three different
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> > internet and it stated that I might get a warning of a trojan and to ignore
> > it. It was a known problem.
Jesper - 22 Mar 2007 18:07 GMT
> It could be a false positive. I bought and downloaded a program on the
> internet and it stated that I might get a warning of a trojan and to ignore
> it. It was a known problem.

An awful lot of trojans tell you in the readme that you may get a security
warning that you are about to install a trojan and that you should ignore
such a warning. Are you sure you didn't just pay for a trojan?
BalRocket61 - 23 Mar 2007 03:26 GMT
I have a digital camera and all I did was import some pictures I had taken.
When my daughter opened her Windows Photo Gallery, the Trojan warning from
Mcaffee popped up! It said it could not quarentine it would I like to remove
it. I deleted the Photos from her gallery and Now I can't find any kind of
Trojan warning or I could not find the file path the warning gave......Which
was "ExploitMS04-028"....Or something of that sort!

> > It could be a false positive. I bought and downloaded a program on the
> > internet and it stated that I might get a warning of a trojan and to ignore
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> warning that you are about to install a trojan and that you should ignore
> such a warning. Are you sure you didn't just pay for a trojan?
Jesper - 23 Mar 2007 05:17 GMT
>  I have a digital camera and all I did was import some pictures I had taken.
> When my daughter opened her Windows Photo Gallery, the Trojan warning from
> Mcaffee popped up! It said it could not quarentine it would I like to remove
> it. I deleted the Photos from her gallery and Now I can't find any kind of
> Trojan warning or I could not find the file path the warning gave......Which
> was "ExploitMS04-028"....Or something of that sort!

Did it say "ExploitMS04-028"? That's the same thing as the
bloodhound.exploit.13. It's a really old vuln.

I'm geting worried here though. Either both Symantec and McAfee use the same
detection logic and find the same false positive, or there really is a
problem. I have a hard time believing that though. That issue was hardly
exploited in the first place.

What kind of camera is it? I think you should place a support call to the AV
vendor and ask them.
BalRocket61 - 23 Mar 2007 08:37 GMT
The camera is a Concord Q, 3042F.
I ran the AVG AV, I also ran Mcaffee AV, and I downloaded the Mcaffee
Stinger, and Ran it, and now the Trojan can't be found!.....It was the
MS04-028, It said it was from 2004???   I can't find it anywhere now?

> >  I have a digital camera and all I did was import some pictures I had taken.
> > When my daughter opened her Windows Photo Gallery, the Trojan warning from
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> What kind of camera is it? I think you should place a support call to the AV
> vendor and ask them.
Jesper - 23 Mar 2007 16:02 GMT
>   The camera is a Concord Q, 3042F.
> I ran the AVG AV, I also ran Mcaffee AV, and I downloaded the Mcaffee
> Stinger, and Ran it, and now the Trojan can't be found!.....It was the
> MS04-028, It said it was from 2004???   I can't find it anywhere now?

Well, that's good. I suppose it could happen that the camera software itself
has malware, but I hold that for reasonably unlikely. It has happened in the
past though. Apple once spread a virus by including it with the iPod.

What bothers me about this is that two different AV manufacturers suddenly
start detecting the same, three year old, low-risk threat. This can't be
coincidence. Their detection mechanisms must use some property of the jpg
file that is being set by certain new cameras.
BalRocket61 - 23 Mar 2007 16:41 GMT
I may need to clarify a little! Mcaffee was the First and Only one to Detect
the trojan. Since I deleted the folder and have been running all the scans,
It has yet to rear it's ugly head. I hope it's gone!
Thank you for continued correspondence, It's nice to have someone interestd
in helping.

> >   The camera is a Concord Q, 3042F.
> > I ran the AVG AV, I also ran Mcaffee AV, and I downloaded the Mcaffee
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> coincidence. Their detection mechanisms must use some property of the jpg
> file that is being set by certain new cameras.
Jesper - 23 Mar 2007 18:01 GMT
>  I may need to clarify a little! Mcaffee was the First and Only one to
Detect
> the trojan. Since I deleted the folder and have been running all the scans,
> It has yet to rear it's ugly head. I hope it's gone!
>  Thank you for continued correspondence, It's nice to have someone interestd
> in helping.

No, I got that. It's just that someone else, on a different thread last
week, had the same exact experience using Symantec. That's what bothers me.

Let me know if it recurs. I'm really interested.
BalRocket61 - 28 Mar 2007 02:43 GMT
Well, the problem happened again today! I started to import some more
pictures to my computer, and as soon as I began to import the warning popped
up again........."MS04-028."  So I immediately stopped the import and deleted
what had been downloaded, and ran the scans......'NO Viruses Found"   SO.....

  The Trojan is in the camera I suppose?
 Is there a way to scan the camera or remove the Trojan from the camera?
"Again...the camera is a "Concord Q eye 3042AF.

 Any help or suggestions will be appreciated.

> >  I may need to clarify a little! Mcaffee was the First and Only one to
> Detect
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Let me know if it recurs. I'm really interested.
vanilla - 29 Mar 2007 09:32 GMT
Sorry it happened again, BalRocket ... this might not be a virus ... maybe
it has something to do with EXIF info, or new kinds of metadata that is not
yet recognized as such by the AV vendors ... until we all find out what is
going on, I think you have the right idea about scanning the files before
importing. This will be fairly easy to do with memory cards but not sure how
to stop, scan and then restart with USB or firewire imports. As far as
scanning the camera itself, I have no idea how that might be done ... would
be surprised to find out it was possible.

vanilla

>  Well, the problem happened again today! I started to import some more
> pictures to my computer, and as soon as I began to import the warning
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>>
>> Let me know if it recurs. I'm really interested.
vanilla - 26 Mar 2007 14:22 GMT
Back in December, while I was still running XP Pro, a friend asked me to
help with getting her pictures from a Secure Digital card onto a CD. So, I
brought her SD card home, put it in the reader, and began the transfer.
While the thumbnails were drawing, I noticed that two of the files had
heavily pixelated thumbs ... there was sudden network activity ... then
those two files disappeared.

I thought about this for a long time. Steganographic phoning home to camera
manufacturer? Is that even possible? I won't mention the other really
paranoid thoughts ... anyway, you guys are not alone with weird photo
uploads.

... vanilla ...

> I have a digital camera and all I did was import some pictures I had
> taken.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>> warning that you are about to install a trojan and that you should ignore
>> such a warning. Are you sure you didn't just pay for a trojan?
MyG Tech - 29 Apr 2007 01:58 GMT
I have a client with similar circumstances:

- Windows Vista
- Photos downloaded directly from a camera
- Using MS Photo Gallery to open them
- Latest version of McAfee installed
- McAfee pop-ups referring to Exploit MS04-028 when an image is opened

McAfee reports the exploit only when the picture file is viewed (not by
using thumbnails to view them).  That is, when the picture is
double-clicked on, hovered over, attached to an email, etc a .tmp file
is created and McAfee generates the trojan pop-up notice but when the AV
scanner scans the original image file, it reports no problems with it
(it's only when the .tmp file is created that it complains).

Further, the exact same file opened on a Windows XP workstation (using
the native MS Picture and Fax viewer) generates no AV messages.  

I'm not one to bash Microsoft but this sounds like a Vista bug to me
since this is not only affecting McAfee users but Norton AV users too.
I'd be interested to see how other AV scanners handle the same situation
on Vista PCs.  My guess is that they'll have the same problems mentioned
in this thread that NAV and McAfee users have already reported.

The challenge will be getting Microsoft to patch it due to the small
number of users that are currently complaining about it as a real
problem.  Sadly, most people probably don't know any better and are
simply deleting the image files assuming their AV tool is correctly
reporting it as a virus when the issue is more of file formatting
problem within Vista's underlying code rather than an actual trojan.

Signature

MyG Tech

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.