The Vista upgrade is one way only.
You need to back up data files and documents then reformat and reinstall XP
and all the programs and data files.
Compared to that Vista may not be that bad.
Vista is slower across the board, but you can get used to that.
Lock-ups may be video driver related and these have improved but are not as
mature as XP counterparts.
There are a few older multimedia/video programs that just will not run on
Vista.
In my experience Vista motherboard drivers for older chipsets, like the AMD
939 socket, just suck and they are not going to be revised.
The worst thing about Vista is that the user gains nothing in the switch
from XP and Microsoft has no answer for that.
> The Vista upgrade is one way only.
> You need to back up data files and documents then reformat and reinstall
> XP and all the programs and data files.
> Compared to that Vista may not be that bad.
> Vista is slower across the board, but you can get used to that.
Not on my system running Vista Ultimate. It is just as fast and
performs just as well as the three XP machines I have. In addition, my boot
time averages 60-70 seconds and complete shutdown occurs in appx. 10
seconds.
> Lock-ups may be video driver related and these have improved but are not
> as mature as XP counterparts.
Sorry. I've never had a lockup, video driver related or otherwise.
Vista suffers from no more problems than XP did one year after its release.
> There are a few older multimedia/video programs that just will not run on
> Vista.
Yes, and the same applies to some that would not run on XP. Old is old
and new is new. The newer video programs work just fine on Vista.
> In my experience Vista motherboard drivers for older chipsets, like the
> AMD 939 socket, just suck and they are not going to be revised.
Vista is designed to run on newer hardware, not the hardware of
yesteryear.
> The worst thing about Vista is that the user gains nothing in the switch
> from XP and Microsoft has no answer for that.
Aside from better security, better performance when configured
properly, better use of memory and the ability to take advantage of advanced
hardware. Vista is superior to XP in many ways and I wouldn't think of going
back to XP.
My opinion is based upon personal experience, as is yours. I haven't
had the problems you've experienced and you shouldn't assume that others
have experienced your problems. Many people have problems with Vista, which
can be overcome. Many have not had problems.
It seems, based upon the content of your post, that you are trying to
run a new, advanced OS on old, outdated hardware.
C.B.

Signature
It is the responsibility and duty of everyone to help the underprivileged
and unfortunate among us.
Not Me - 21 May 2008 09:17 GMT
>> The Vista upgrade is one way only.
>> You need to back up data files and documents then reformat and reinstall
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
>
> C.B.
I run it on new, speedy hardware with all the RAM it can support, 250GB SATA
x2.
I use properly configured DDR (4x1GB) and a 512MB PCIe video card.
I still don't like it, and XP runs faster on the same hardware (dual boot).
You may like the Escape but I prefer to drive an Acadia.
Does that make either of us 'wrong'?
Canuck57 - 21 May 2008 16:18 GMT
> I run it on new, speedy hardware with all the RAM it can support, 250GB
> SATA x2.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> You may like the Escape but I prefer to drive an Acadia.
> Does that make either of us 'wrong'?
He is touting the Microsoft line, you are not supposed to have a choice
without double dipping.
Marc - 22 May 2008 00:18 GMT
> Not on my system running Vista Ultimate. It is just as fast and
> performs just as well as the three XP machines I have. In addition, my
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>> There are a few older multimedia/video programs that just will not run on
>> Vista.
Who shut's down? Back in 2001 I was in the habbit of sleeping my Mac. Now I
can finally do the same with my PCs, XP used to complain if I had too much
open and tried to sleep/hibernate.
As for those unable to get on with Vista, let them upgade at their own pace.
The transition from OS9 to OSX too a while too.