No, sorry, you need 2000 or better. (My 2003 works fine.) If you install 97
you are going to have file system permissions errors that won't let you do
any more than Works would. You are stuck with upgrading to newer Office, or
using Works (or 'open office' shareware, which is, in my opinion, no better
than Works)
Probably your cheapest path is going to be an 'upgrade from 97' copy of
Word. Somewhere around $100 U.S.

Signature
Was this helpful? Then click the Ratings button. Voting helps the web
interface.
http://www.microsoft.com/wn3/locales/help/help_en-us.htm#RateAPostAsAnswer
Mark L. Ferguson
.
> No, sorry, you need 2000 or better. (My 2003 works fine.) If you install 97
> you are going to have file system permissions errors that won't let you do
> any more than Works would.
Really? Before I dumped Vista for all the other problems it has (I gave
it a month) it ran my '97 Small Business Ed. apps (Word, Excel, Publisher)
with no problems at all. There is an issue with patching up to SR-2, but the
fix
for that is here:
http://bytes.com/forum/thread622173.html
The only "older" app I had trouble with (installed separately) was Outlook
2000, and there's lots of stuff on the 'net you can Google for on ways
around most of the issues there.
Don't give up on '97, later versions add NOTHING of value, just useless
bloat. '97 runs like lightning on newer machines due to it's smaller footprint.
> You are stuck with upgrading to newer Office, or
> using Works (or 'open office' shareware, which is, in my opinion, no better
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> > can
> > not do alot of the same functions
Peter Foldes - 24 May 2008 18:15 GMT
Then perhaps take a look here
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/932087/en-us

Signature
Peter
Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
>> No, sorry, you need 2000 or better. (My 2003 works fine.) If you install 97
>> you are going to have file system permissions errors that won't let you do
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>> > can
>> > not do alot of the same functions
V Green - 24 May 2008 18:28 GMT
So MS says that you need to buy new software just
to run it on Vista. Big woop. Should that be a surprise
given that they are in the business of selling software ? I know
some of you fanboys here think MS is God, cower
and grovel before them and scrupulously follow their every
directive, but some of us don't.
I'm saying that it runs fine. Go ahead and just stay
inside your MS box and don't think for yourself.
Your choice.
Then perhaps take a look here
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/932087/en-us

Signature
Peter
Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
>> No, sorry, you need 2000 or better. (My 2003 works fine.) If you install 97
>> you are going to have file system permissions errors that won't let you do
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>> > can
>> > not do alot of the same functions