Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsWindows VistaWindows XPWindows MeWindows 98Windows 95Virtual PCInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressWindows MediaSecurity
Related Topics
MS Server ProductsMS OfficePC HardwareMore Topics ...

Windows Forum / Windows XP / Wireless Networking / May 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

wireless to wireless bridge question

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Bob - 30 May 2008 04:01 GMT
I'm about to depart the hot southwest desert for the mountains in our
travel trailer.  Last year the WIFI service was marginal (mainly low
signal levels inside the trailer), so this year I've installed an
outside directional antenna on a rotor.  Since both my wife and I want
to use computers at the same time, I created an in trailer network.  

It consists of:  from the house Qwest(Actionteck) DSL modem to a
Linksys WET54g bridge(located in the trailer) (wired)  to a Linksys 4
port hub.  From the hub I connect (wired) to my computer.  Also,
(wired) to a Linksys WAP54g access point.  Connecting to the WAP54g
(wireless) is a WMB54g music bridge to the trailer audio system.  When
feeding audio from my computer the system works OK.

When I connected the laptop (wireless) to the WAP54g, I get a good
signal level connection, however when browsing the WEB, the screens
are somewhat jumbled or I get a "can't display that page" error.
Connecting directly (wireless) to the Qwest modem, things are OK.

Am I trying to do something that isn't feaseable?
Thanks

FYI, the coax feeding the WET54G is about 8 inches - I mounted the
WET54g just inside the roof and the antenna is just outside the roof.
Besides, the signal level is shown as 100% on both WIFI sources.
(Probably not quite the same, but certainly adaquate.)
Phillip Windell - 30 May 2008 14:44 GMT
You would have the Bridge picking up the signal and connecting into the RV
Park's system,...then you connect a simple Switch to it.  Connect wired
machines to the Switch.  Connect the WAP54g directly to the Switch as well
and the wireless machine would use that.

I see no place or reason for there to ever be a "DSL Modem" anywhere.

If you use the WRT54g3g you won't need to use any "hotspot" and can use it
anywhere there is a strong enough cell tower signal.  There would be a
WRT54g3g,...and that is it,...nothing else.

There are 3 variations of it depending on if you use Sprint, AT&T or
Verizon.  It has built in Switch ports for the Wired machines and a built in
Wireless Access Point for the Wireless machines.

http://www.linksys.com/servlet/Satellite?c=L_Product_C2&childpagename=US%2FLayou
t&cid=1175243246762&pagename=Linksys%2FCommon%2FVisitorWrapper&lid=4676233028B15


Signature

Phillip Windell
www.wandtv.com

The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
-----------------------------------------------------

> I'm about to depart the hot southwest desert for the mountains in our
> travel trailer.  Last year the WIFI service was marginal (mainly low
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> Besides, the signal level is shown as 100% on both WIFI sources.
> (Probably not quite the same, but certainly adaquate.)
Bob - 31 May 2008 14:04 GMT
>You would have the Bridge picking up the signal and connecting into the RV
>Park's system,...then you connect a simple Switch to it.  Connect wired
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>http://www.linksys.com/servlet/Satellite?c=L_Product_C2&childpagename=US%2FLayou
t&cid=1175243246762&pagename=Linksys%2FCommon%2FVisitorWrapper&lid=4676233028B15

I'm sorry to confuse you.  I'm using my DSL in the house to emulate
the RV Park's WIFI system.  The Qwest modem has WIFI built in, thus my
being able to use it.
Essentally, what you sugges is what I did.  The only thing different
is I'm using a hub rather than a switch.  As I said, I can connect to
a web page  sometimes.  But when I can connect the page listing is not
displayed correctly.

NTL, thanks for the info.
Jack (MVP-Networking). - 31 May 2008 19:32 GMT
Hi
If you are going to use two computers you should use a Router.
That will make sure that you can have two valid private IP and it would add
security to your Network.
The setting should be Antenna, to WET54g, to WAN port of a Wireless Router.
Then you can plug your PC to the Router, and use the Wireless as well with
the same Router.
The general principle is described here, http://www.ezlan.net/shield.html
Jack (MVP-Networking).

> I'm about to depart the hot southwest desert for the mountains in our
> travel trailer.  Last year the WIFI service was marginal (mainly low
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> Besides, the signal level is shown as 100% on both WIFI sources.
> (Probably not quite the same, but certainly adaquate.)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.