> I've read Michael Stevens excellent paper on Repair Installs but have run
> into a problem that's not described.
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> What do we do?
Apparently the hardware is too different for a Repair Install. Do a Clean
Install, then install drivers for the new hardware, programs from
installation media, restore data from backups.
http://michaelstevenstech.com/cleanxpinstall.html - Clean Install How-To
http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/page2.html#reinstall_Windows - What you
will need on-hand
Malke

Signature
MS-MVP Windows Shell/User
Elephant Boy Computers
www.elephantboycomputers.com
"Don't Panic"
Jim Gainsley - 29 Jul 2006 18:26 GMT
Thanks for your comments, please see my reply to Mike Hall.
Jim
> > I've read Michael Stevens excellent paper on Repair Installs but have run
> > into a problem that's not described.
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
>
> Malke
While a repair install can get XP settled on hardware other than that on
which it was first installed, I doubt if Microsoft had in mind to facilitate
users transferring an installation between wildly differing hardware bases..
There is also the 'third party factor' here.. the program used to initially
clone the installation may not have done a particularly good job.. some
don't, especially if there is more than just the OS being cloned..
In this way, the 'repair install' facility not only has to try to make sense
of the driver issues, but also has to try to preserve settings that may or
may not have been be royally screwed during the cloning process..

Signature
Mike Hall
MS-MVP Windows Shell/User
> I've read Michael Stevens excellent paper on Repair Installs but have run
> into a problem that's not described.
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
> Jim
Jim Gainsley - 29 Jul 2006 18:25 GMT
Well I sort of see your point. With Windows 95-98 MS told us that the
program could stand changes in processors and chipsets but could not stand
changes in bus technology and trying to do that caused an unstable system
that might run until one new thing was added and then become wildly erratic.
Are you saying then that Microsoft says that bus technology changes are
still not doable with WinXP? (I not familiar with the technology
differences between PCI and PCI-E, but I was hoping they wouldn't be great
enough to cause a problem.)
We need to know because we will be converting a number of machines from
win98SE PCI to PCI-E and if there's anyway to avoid new installs we like to
find it--it would save us a huge amount of work.
Thanks for your help.
Jim
> While a repair install can get XP settled on hardware other than that on
> which it was first installed, I doubt if Microsoft had in mind to facilitate
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
> >
> > Jim
gls858 - 31 Jul 2006 15:25 GMT
> Well I sort of see your point. With Windows 95-98 MS told us that the
> program could stand changes in processors and chipsets but could not stand
[quoted text clipped - 73 lines]
>>>
>>> Jim
It might save you a lot of time in the front end but cost you many hours
and lots of headaches in the long run. I would suggest loading XP and then
installing the needed software and restoring necessary files.
gls858
Jim Gainsley - 29 Jul 2006 18:29 GMT
One more thought. The Recovery Console is apparently still available. Might
that work? I've never used it.
Jim
> While a repair install can get XP settled on hardware other than that on
> which it was first installed, I doubt if Microsoft had in mind to facilitate
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
> >
> > Jim
Jim Gainsley - 29 Jul 2006 19:12 GMT
If I do a clean install and apply our Tape backup, would the F.A.S.T program
work for us? I have read but not studied Gary Woodruff's paper.
> While a repair install can get XP settled on hardware other than that on
> which it was first installed, I doubt if Microsoft had in mind to facilitate
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
> >
> > Jim