Cross-Posted to OE Newsgroups:
John R,
Yes the System Restore will restore the block senders list back to the way
that it was for the previous week. Since it restores the system's registry
back to where it was then. Before using the restore feature, with OE closed,
consider backing up the current registry keys for OE message rules/block
senders, saving it to a floppy disk, or another media, you will need to do
this for each IDENTITY, if you use Multiple Identities in OE. Then after you
do the system restore, delete the old OE registry keys, and merge the new OE
registry keys. The Keys can be found after typing REGEDIT in the RUN command
under the START button, located here:
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{LongID Number}\Software\Microsoft\Outlook
Express\5.0\Block Senders
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{LongID Number}\Software\Microsoft\Outlook
Express\5.0\Rules
Again make sure after you do the restore, and OE closed, that you first
delete these old registry keys, that are now present. Then you can click on
the saved registry keys, and merge them back into the registry.

Signature
Add MS to your News Reader: news://msnews.microsoft.com
Rich/rerat
(RRR News) <message rule>
<<Previous Text Snipped to Save Bandwidth When Appropriate>>
">> "John R" <tooh@cox.net> wrote in message
>> news:YAUaj.12599$hO4.857@newsfe19.lga...
>>> I have "blocked sender" of a lot of spam in OE early today. If I
>>> restore the system to a date a week ago will the blocked senders be
>>> unblocked?
Sam
I was pointing out that when posting you need to be aware of what others
have posted.

Signature
Hope this helps.
Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> So are you saying it is useless to use the appropriate newsgroup? If
> that is not what you are saying then the only value to saying what
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>> Enquire, plan and execute
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sam Hobbs - 26 Dec 2007 23:29 GMT
And I was pointing out that there are other newsgroups in which people
seaking answers are more likely to get the best answers. Since you choose to
ignore that it is useless to continue this.
> Sam
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>>> Enquire, plan and execute
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Gerry - 27 Dec 2007 00:00 GMT
Sam
Would he have got a better answer than the one he got?

Signature
Hope this helps.
Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> And I was pointing out that there are other newsgroups in which people
> seaking answers are more likely to get the best answers. Since you
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>>>> Enquire, plan and execute
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sam Hobbs - 29 Dec 2007 07:10 GMT
There are many excellent reasons why there is such an abundance of
newsgroups each with varying purposes. Your opinion obviously is that only
one newsgroup is needed. That opinion will always be inconsistent with most
other people.
> Sam
>
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>>>>> Enquire, plan and execute
>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Gerry - 29 Dec 2007 08:16 GMT
No Sam. One good answer to a question. What you suggested was fine if
this was not so.

Signature
Hope this helps.
Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> There are many excellent reasons why there is such an abundance of
> newsgroups each with varying purposes. Your opinion obviously is that
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>> Enquire, plan and execute
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sam Hobbs - 31 Dec 2007 18:38 GMT
You just want to be negative. You will be negative regarlous of what I say.
So go ahead, take one last strike, you will always insist upon having the
last response; you will never let this go away unless you do.
> No Sam. One good answer to a question. What you suggested was fine if this
> was not so.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>>> Enquire, plan and execute
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~