Windows Forum / Windows XP / Customization / November 2005
XP Media Center Edition ??
|
|
Thread rating:  |
JAQK - 28 Nov 2005 21:11 GMT Could anyone explain what this edition entails, or better yet what basic functionality/support might be missing ?
Thanks.
ThE SlAyEr - 28 Nov 2005 21:34 GMT In news:4oKif.2905$HC2.2536@trnddc06, JAQK <johnny@tamtam.com> the stupid moronic freak from an alien planet where his/her mother was a universal whore, wrote:
> Could anyone explain what this edition entails, or better yet what > basic functionality/support might be missing ? > > Thanks. im sure someone can yes.....
bill maybe??
regards slayer
soz folks wanted to get in there first....
Ken Blake, MVP - 28 Nov 2005 21:45 GMT > In news:4oKif.2905$HC2.2536@trnddc06, > JAQK <johnny@tamtam.com> the stupid moronic freak from an alien > planet where his/her mother was a universal whore, wrote: >> Could anyone explain what this edition entails, or better yet what >> basic functionality/support might be missing ? Media Center is the same as XP Professional, plus additional media features, and minus the ability to join a domain.
Other than that lack of ability to join a domain, nothing is missing.
 Signature Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User Please reply to the newsgroup
kurttrail - 28 Nov 2005 22:04 GMT >> In news:4oKif.2905$HC2.2536@trnddc06, >> JAQK <johnny@tamtam.com> the stupid moronic freak from an alien [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Other than that lack of ability to join a domain, nothing is missing. And MS doesn't provide support for it, not that MS support is worth anything to begin with.
 Signature Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
JAQK - 28 Nov 2005 22:10 GMT Umm, what about live updates ? It seems strange that MS would not 'support' one of their own OS versions.
>> Media Center is the same as XP Professional, plus additional media >> features, and minus the ability to join a domain. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > And MS doesn't provide support for it, not that MS support is worth > anything to begin with. Malke - 28 Nov 2005 22:22 GMT > Umm, what about live updates ? It seems strange that MS would not > 'support' one of their own OS versions. I don't know why Kurttrail said there was no support for it unless he meant that since Media Center comes only preinstalled on Media Center hardware by OEM's (HP, Dell, etc.) the support for the computer itself must come from the OEM. An XP Media Center pc gets its Windows Updates just like all the other XP editions.
Comparison Guide - http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/home/howtobuy/choosing2.mspx
and
Five Editions of Windows XP Compared - http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/evaluation/compare.mspx
Malke
 Signature Elephant Boy Computers www.elephantboycomputers.com "Don't Panic!" MS-MVP Windows - Shell/User
kurttrail - 29 Nov 2005 08:28 GMT >> Umm, what about live updates ? It seems strange that MS would not >> 'support' one of their own OS versions. [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Malke Patches aren't support. And having the OEM support MC only gives them the excuse to blame MS for all incompatibilities.
 Signature Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
Wizard - 29 Nov 2005 21:25 GMT kurttrail dontemailme@anywhereintheknowuniverse.org, wrote in message CgPa7L9FHA.2176@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl:
>>> Umm, what about live updates ? It seems strange that MS would not >>> 'support' one of their own OS versions. [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > Patches aren't support. And having the OEM support MC only gives them > the excuse to blame MS for all incompatibilities. Patches are supported! They're patched.
 Signature Is it possible you only act stupid to hide that fact you know you are stupid?
kurttrail - 30 Nov 2005 08:52 GMT > kurttrail dontemailme@anywhereintheknowuniverse.org, wrote in message > CgPa7L9FHA.2176@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl: [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > Patches are supported! They're patched. Patches are patches, and I didn't say the patches weren't supported, dimwit. I'm talking about the support one can get with retail XP home & pro. XPMC only comes in the OEM variety, which the OEM must provide support for, not MS.
 Signature Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
Wizard - 30 Nov 2005 11:12 GMT kurttrail dontemailme@anywhereintheknowuniverse.org, wrote in message PaNxtY9FHA.1140@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl:
>> kurttrail dontemailme@anywhereintheknowuniverse.org, wrote in message >> CgPa7L9FHA.2176@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl: [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > XPMC only comes in the OEM variety, which the OEM must provide support > for, not MS. There's no need for the bad language. I was actually on your side and thought you were in need of help, that's all.
 Signature Is it possible you only act stupid to hide that fact you know you are stupid?
Kadaitcha Man - 30 Nov 2005 12:35 GMT > There's no need for the bad language. Shut the f.ck up, you whining netKKKop c.nt.
> I was actually on your side and > thought you were in need of help, that's all. From you? BWAHHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA! You techno-fucktard pillock.
Wizard - 30 Nov 2005 12:45 GMT Kadaitcha Man f.ck-you.ya.c.nt@kiss-my-big-black-a.s.com, wrote in message mlcvp.584.1@133.256.1.103.MISMATCH:
>> There's no need for the bad language. > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > From you? BWAHHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA! You techno-fucktard pillock. I know some things technical. And you seem to have a potty mouth. Do you kiss your Mom with that?
 Signature Is it possible you only act stupid to hide that fact you know you are stupid?
Kadaitcha Man - 30 Nov 2005 12:54 GMT > Kadaitcha Man f.ck-you.ya.c.nt@kiss-my-big-black-a.s.com, wrote in > message mlcvp.584.1@133.256.1.103.MISMATCH: [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > I know some things technical. BWAHAHAHAHAHHA! That's just as much bullshit as the pseudo-technical bullshit you pass off as 'advice'.
> And you seem to have a potty mouth. No f.cking sh.t, Shylock? f.ck me dead, eh. Who'd a f.cking thunk it?
> Do you kiss your Mom with that? Just because you are into necrophilia, it does not logically follow that everyone else is.
Wizard - 30 Nov 2005 13:12 GMT Kadaitcha Man f.ck-you.ya.c.nt@kiss-my-big-black-a.s.com, wrote in message mle33.5g4.1@133.256.1.103.MISMATCH:
>> Kadaitcha Man f.ck-you.ya.c.nt@kiss-my-big-black-a.s.com, wrote in >> message mlcvp.584.1@133.256.1.103.MISMATCH: >>> "Wizard" <stop.spam@nic.bra> wrote in message news:9721376c76f3483d8ae26825160fe0d4@you.fourpenny-noxious-fruit-bat.net
>>>> There's no need for the bad language. >>> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >>> >>> From you? BWAHHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA! You techno-fucktard pillock. I've already answer that disgusting smut!
>> I know some things technical. Yes I do!
> BWAHAHAHAHAHHA! That's just as much bullshit as the pseudo-technical > bullshit you pass off as 'advice'. There you go again. Yuck! I am more technical than you could ever know.
>> And you seem to have a potty mouth. No, you do.
> No f.cking sh.t, Shylock? f.ck me dead, eh. Who'd a f.cking thunk it? You need to see a doctor and quick.
>> Do you kiss your Mom with that? No, and I hope she doesn't have to you.
> Just because you are into necrophilia, it does not logically follow > that everyone else is. I am not of any sort that way inclined, and it would seem your having mentioned it might suggest you are on a regular basis. I may not reply to your next sewer post. Hopefully I have taught you a lesson in manors.
 Signature Is it possible you only act stupid to hide that fact you know you are stupid?
Kadaitcha Man - 30 Nov 2005 13:22 GMT > Kadaitcha Man f.ck-you.ya.c.nt@kiss-my-big-black-a.s.com, wrote in > message mle33.5g4.1@133.256.1.103.MISMATCH: [quoted text clipped - 44 lines] > reply to your next sewer post. Hopefully I have taught you a lesson > in manors. Tell some c.nt that cares. The abuse department at camcost.nut, for example.
X-Complaints-To: abuse@camcost.nut
kurttrail - 30 Nov 2005 13:18 GMT > kurttrail dontemailme@anywhereintheknowuniverse.org, wrote in message > PaNxtY9FHA.1140@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl: [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > There's no need for the bad language. I was actually on your side and > thought you were in need of help, that's all. ROFL! Bad Language! On my side! LOL!
I needed help! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Thanks for the laughs, Wizzie!
 Signature Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
Colin Barnhorst - 30 Nov 2005 05:44 GMT OEM editions of Windows receive all patches, hotfixes, service packs, and optional downloads from Microsoft Update. In that respect there is no difference between OEM and retail editions of Windows products. MCE is an OEM edition of Windows (as is XP Pro x64) because of device and device driver dependencies that Microsoft believes can only be addressed properly by system builders. Not every PC is capable of handling things like tv tuner cards, etc.
 Signature Colin Barnhorst [MVP Windows - Virtual Machine] (Reply to the group only unless otherwise requested)
>> >>> Umm, what about live updates ? It seems strange that MS would not [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > Patches aren't support. And having the OEM support MC only gives them the > excuse to blame MS for all incompatibilities. kurttrail - 30 Nov 2005 08:55 GMT > OEM editions of Windows receive all patches, hotfixes, service packs, > and optional downloads from Microsoft Update. I didn't say that XPMC didn't get that.
> In that respect there > is no difference between OEM and retail editions of Windows products. > MCE is an OEM edition of Windows (as is XP Pro x64) because of device > and device driver dependencies that Microsoft believes can only be > addressed properly by system builders. Not every PC is capable of > handling things like tv tuner cards, etc. Yes, Big Bro looking out for the little guy, and limiting his choices.
 Signature Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
Kadaitcha Man - 30 Nov 2005 09:32 GMT > MCE is an OEM edition of Windows (as is XP Pro x64) because of device > and device driver dependencies that Microsoft believes can only be > addressed properly by system builders. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Frank DeLucca, MS-MPV - 28 Nov 2005 22:24 GMT >> In news:4oKif.2905$HC2.2536@trnddc06, >> JAQK <johnny@tamtam.com> the stupid moronic freak from an alien [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Other than that lack of ability to join a domain, nothing is missing. It's obviously you have misspelled something in your sig. Did you install Service Pak 2?
 Signature - Frank DeLucca -
MS-MPV Microsoft Corparation
Gloria Vixentart - 28 Nov 2005 22:56 GMT Frank DeLucca, MS-MPV frank.delucca.microsoft@gmail.com, wrote in message 0051128222742.D668E6B61@smtp4.wanadoo.nl:
>>> In news:4oKif.2905$HC2.2536@trnddc06, >>> JAQK <johnny@tamtam.com> the stupid moronic freak from an alien [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > It's obviously you have misspelled something in your sig. Did you > install Service Pak 2? No, AOL.
 Signature Marsey dotes And dosey dotes Akiddley tivey too. Wooden ewe?
Mares eat oats And does eat oats, And little lambs eat ivy. A Kid will eat ivy too, Wouldn't you?
kenny - 29 Nov 2005 12:21 GMT you do not explain that media center is picky about the harware it uses, like display adaptors and tv cards, and it needs a fast machine too....
>> In news:4oKif.2905$HC2.2536@trnddc06, >> JAQK <johnny@tamtam.com> the stupid moronic freak from an alien [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Other than that lack of ability to join a domain, nothing is missing. Bob I - 29 Nov 2005 14:05 GMT In the interest of covering the bases: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/mediacenter/evaluation/faq.mspx
> you do not explain that media center is picky about the harware it uses, > like display adaptors and tv cards, and it needs a fast machine too.... [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >> >>Other than that lack of ability to join a domain, nothing is missing. Bruce Chambers - 29 Nov 2005 02:09 GMT > Could anyone explain what this edition entails, or better yet what basic > functionality/support might be missing ? > > Thanks. WinXP Media Center Edition is a _superset_ (iow, it does _everything_ WinXP Pro can do (except join a domain), plus contains additional multi-media features) of WinXP Pro.
Windows XP Media Center Edition Home http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ehome/default.asp
 Signature Bruce Chambers
Help us help you: http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don't ever count on having both at once. - RAH
Kadaitcha Man - 29 Nov 2005 02:53 GMT >> Could anyone explain what this edition entails, or better yet what >> basic functionality/support might be missing ? [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > WinXP Media Center Edition is a _superset_ (iow, it does > _everything_ WinXP Pro can do (except join a domain) See that except of yours, you fuckwad c.nt? That really f.cking big, exception, yes? Well, that makes it a subset, not a superset, you less than useless snotfuck.
|
|
|