Yes, it does help.
Thank you kindly.
I have installed them all except 3.5 -- using a belt and suspenders
approach, which is probably overkill.
Do some of the common MS applications use them?
That would seem to be eminently logical.
DSH
>>> Which applications require it?
>>
>> Whichever ones the manufacturer of decided to utilize the .NET
>> Framework...
>> In other words - it can be anything - you'd have to look at the system
>> requirements of the software to know.
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> HTH
Poprivet` - 08 Dec 2007 22:11 GMT
> Yes, it does help.
>
[quoted text clipped - 58 lines]
>>
>> HTH
Actually, no, if you mean things like Office and MS's
generalized apps. The .NETs are more for support of
software developers who write programs, sometimes
rather complex, such as CADD software, some Video
applications, things like that. Sometimes it bugs me
because you think you're getting this neat little
program that takes hardly any disk space, and then they
turn around and tell you to get this huge .NET variant
to make their program work<g>. Don't get me wrong;
it's the way to do it, but ... still ... .
HTH
Pop`
D. Spencer Hines - 08 Dec 2007 22:50 GMT
Very Enlightening...
THAT is what I was trying to get at -- which sort of programs require them.
Thank you.
DSH
> Actually, no, if you mean things like Office and MS's generalized apps.
> The .NETs are more for support of software developers who write programs,
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Pop`
Poprivet` - 09 Dec 2007 18:17 GMT
'Welcome
> Very Enlightening...
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>>
>> Pop`