Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsWindows VistaWindows XPWindows MeWindows 98Windows 95Virtual PCInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressWindows MediaSecurity
Related Topics
MS Server ProductsMS OfficePC HardwareMore Topics ...

Windows Forum / Windows XP / Hardware / August 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

About to get my first AMD based system

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
SleepyDragon - 01 Aug 2005 17:43 GMT
Ok Im pretty much sold on going this route with my new rig. This being
my first AMD rig I had a coupla questions. Ok for the CPU I was looking
at gettin a 3500+ Vinice core. But then the other night on Newegg I
think ... I eyed a 3700+ SD core for about $60 more. Is there any kinda
noticable difference in performace between the two chips? and where do
you go to get info on each of the individual cores and how they are
different. BTW how are these system specs?
ASUS A8N SLi Delux
Athlon 3500+ or 3700+
1 GB OCZ PC3200 mem
GeForce 6800 GT (For now ... hey least I can move up to the GTX if I
wanted)
and that all that IM 100% on for now. Thanks
mikey - 02 Aug 2005 00:50 GMT
check the AMD web site for cpu spec and comprrisons.

mikeyhsd@sport.rr.com

 Ok Im pretty much sold on going this route with my new rig. This being
 my first AMD rig I had a coupla questions. Ok for the CPU I was looking
 at gettin a 3500+ Vinice core. But then the other night on Newegg I
 think ... I eyed a 3700+ SD core for about $60 more. Is there any kinda
 noticable difference in performace between the two chips? and where do
 you go to get info on each of the individual cores and how they are
 different. BTW how are these system specs?
 ASUS A8N SLi Delux
 Athlon 3500+ or 3700+
 1 GB OCZ PC3200 mem
 GeForce 6800 GT (For now ... hey least I can move up to the GTX if I
 wanted)
 and that all that IM 100% on for now. Thanks
Bob Knowlden - 02 Aug 2005 01:47 GMT
The "Venice" 3500+ and "San Diego" 3700+ have same clock frequency, but the
3700+ has 1 MB of L2 cache (rather than 512 kB on the 3500+). They are
probably also different steppings.

I don't know whether the larger L2 cache would be worth an additional $60 to
you. It would certainly be faster for tasks where the data fit in the L2
cache, rather than having to swap data in from the system's RAM.

Address scrambled. Replace nkbob with bobkn.

> Ok Im pretty much sold on going this route with my new rig. This being
> my first AMD rig I had a coupla questions. Ok for the CPU I was looking
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> wanted)
> and that all that IM 100% on for now. Thanks
Ron - 02 Aug 2005 04:39 GMT
I would check Tom's Hardware for benchmarks on the following CPU's.

www.tomshardware.com

> Ok Im pretty much sold on going this route with my new rig. This being
> my first AMD rig I had a coupla questions. Ok for the CPU I was looking
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> wanted)
> and that all that IM 100% on for now. Thanks
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.