Inbound connection problem

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

Lokesh Bhatnagar - 28 Feb 2005 09:54 GMT

Dear Sir,
The number of simultaneous connections for Windows XP Professional is 10.Can
anybody tell how to increase this so that I can connect more users to a
shared folder in my Windows xp pc.

Thanx

Lokesh

Reply to this Message

Bob Willard - 28 Feb 2005 11:58 GMT

> Dear Sir,
> The number of simultaneous connections for Windows XP Professional is 10.Can
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Lokesh

You'll need to upgrade from XP PRO to a real server OS, such as Win2003 Server.
Or, downgrade to W98, which has no such limit. Or, switch to Linux.

Signature

Cheers, Bob

Reply to this Message

Lokesh Bhatnagar - 28 Feb 2005 12:18 GMT

Dear Bob Sir,
There is'nt any way like registry setting or some kind of patches or tweak
for this instead of going your suggestion.
Thanx for quick reply.

> > Dear Sir,
> > The number of simultaneous connections for Windows XP Professional is 10.Can
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> --
> Cheers, Bob

Reply to this Message

Bob Willard - 28 Feb 2005 18:56 GMT

> Dear Bob Sir,
> There is'nt any way like registry setting or some kind of patches or tweak
> for this instead of going your suggestion.
> Thanx for quick reply.

Sorry. How would Bill Gates be able to eke out a living, if he gave away
server capabilities to folks who only pay for workstation software? Do
you want poor Bill to starve?

Signature

Cheers, Bob

Reply to this Message

Richard G. Harper - 28 Feb 2005 12:07 GMT

Buy a copy of Windows 2000 Server or Windows Server 2003.

Signature

Richard G. Harper [MVP Shell/User] rgharper@gmail.com
* PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups
* for the benefit of all. Private mail is usually not replied to.
* My website, such as it is ... http://rgharper.mvps.org/
* HELP us help YOU ... http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm

> Dear Sir,
> The number of simultaneous connections for Windows XP Professional is
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Lokesh

Reply to this Message