Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsWindows VistaWindows XPWindows MeWindows 98Windows 95Virtual PCInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressWindows MediaSecurity
Related Topics
MS Server ProductsMS OfficePC HardwareMore Topics ...

Windows Forum / Windows XP / Performance and Maintainance / September 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

swap or paging file size for best performance

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
gavino - 29 Sep 2006 00:25 GMT
I heard to set max and min size custom to the reccomended mb size as
custom is best way to optimize the swap space for xp.
Anyone feel differently?
Will Denny - 29 Sep 2006 01:06 GMT
Hi

Please try the following article:

"Virtual Memory in Windows XP"
http://aumha.org/win5/a/xpvm.php

Signature

Will Denny
MS-MVP Windows Shell/User
Please reply to the News Groups

>I heard to set max and min size custom to the reccomended mb size as
> custom is best way to optimize the swap space for xp.
> Anyone feel differently?
Ron Martell - 29 Sep 2006 08:29 GMT
>I heard to set max and min size custom to the reccomended mb size as
>custom is best way to optimize the swap space for xp.
>Anyone feel differently?

If your computer is using the paging file so extensively that any
optimization could have a detectable impact on overall performance
then what you really need to do is to add more RAM so as to reduce, or
perhaps even eliminate, the need to actually move active memory
content from RAM to the paging file and then to subsequently move it
back in when that content is again required.

Most of what is reported as "PF Usage" by Windows Task Manager is in
fact "phantom" usage, consisting primarily of the unused portions of
memory allocation requests.  By design, Windows maps these to the
paging file, leaving the RAM for only those items that are actually
being used.   This phantom usage involves no actual hard drive
activity and therefore there is nothing that any optimization could
possibly do that would improve performance with regard to this usage.

By way of illustration, at this moment on my own system Task Manager
is reporting PF Usage as 455 mb.  However the actual amount of active
memory content currently in the paging file is only 38 mb and the
physical size of my paging file is 80 mb, which is my specified
minimum.

So follow the advice in the article by the late Alex Nichol that Will
Denny referred you to.

Good luck

Ron Martell     Duncan B.C.    Canada
Signature

Microsoft MVP (1997 - 2006)
On-Line Help Computer Service
http://onlinehelp.bc.ca
Syberfix Remote Computer Repair

"Anyone who thinks that they are too small to make a difference
has never been in bed with a mosquito."

Robert Moir - 29 Sep 2006 10:52 GMT
> I heard to set max and min size custom to the reccomended mb size as
> custom is best way to optimize the swap space for xp.

That might have been true of Windows once, but right now, unless you've got
very specific and special requirements the best thing to do is to let the
system manage it.

Signature

Robert Moir
Microsoft MVP
www.robertmoir.com

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.