Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsWindows VistaWindows XPWindows MeWindows 98Windows 95Virtual PCInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressWindows MediaSecurity
Related Topics
MS Server ProductsMS OfficePC HardwareMore Topics ...

Windows Forum / Windows XP / Performance and Maintainance / October 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

why would speed of ntfs do

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
ryker - 30 Oct 2006 20:07 GMT
running xp-pro-fat32.  wifes office comp is the same.  she has a medical
program that is about 110 mb.  she uses 2 different sandisk for daily
backup, usb-2.  Takes about 15 minutes for this, really slow.

Saw this on a search of google, by someone else doing this.  I formatted
the sandisk with the ntfs file system, did the backup in about 2 to 3
minutes.  Tried several times, result the same.  Could not run the
program (Gov. Hippa laws forbid me to see patient info.), but I assume
that all info was there, backed up. (size was the same-and program would
open)

Why would the comp (fat32) backup to this sandisk (now ntfs) that much
faster? I can see faster, but this much faster.

Would it do this for the whole computer?
Ted Zieglar - 30 Oct 2006 20:17 GMT
FAT32 is, theoretically, faster than NTFS because it has less overhead.
But we're not talking about anything that you could actually notice.

I'm going to guess you're referring to a USB flash drive, since Sandisk
is a brand name, not a product.

It's debatable whether there's any sense in formatting a flash drive
with a journaling file system. In any case, you haven't provided any
details about the backup, so it's anybody's guess.
---
Ted Zieglar
"Backup is a computer user's best friend."

> running xp-pro-fat32.  wifes office comp is the same.  she has a medical
> program that is about 110 mb.  she uses 2 different sandisk for daily
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Would it do this for the whole computer?
ryker - 30 Oct 2006 23:13 GMT
Ted

Was just my assumption, yes it is one of their usb flash drives.

What would you need to know about the backup other than the 100 mb size
as to venture a guess as to why the backup ran so much faster this way?
It was a straight forward copy to the drive.

Bob

> FAT32 is, theoretically, faster than NTFS because it has less overhead.
> But we're not talking about anything that you could actually notice.
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>>
>> Would it do this for the whole computer?
Ted Zieglar - 31 Oct 2006 03:02 GMT
Using what software? How configured? Was anything else running in the
background?

---
Ted Zieglar
"Backup is a computer user's best friend."

> Ted
>
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>>>
>>> Would it do this for the whole computer?
ryker - 31 Oct 2006 13:05 GMT
selected the "pro-manager" program and all data files in explorer, right
click, copy to drive.  normal window services running.

> Using what software? How configured? Was anything else running in the
> background?
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
>>>>
>>>> Would it do this for the whole computer?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.