Not from my point of view there isn't. The point i was making is that 'i've
used it for a long time and can recommend it.'

Signature
John Barnett MVP
Associate Expert
http://xphelpandsupport.mvps.org
http://vistasupport.mvps.org
The information in this mail/post is supplied "as is". No warranty of any
kind, either expressed or implied, is made in relation to the accuracy,
reliability or content of this mail/post. The Author shall not be liable for
any direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damages arising out of the
use of, or inability to use, information or opinions expressed in this
mail/post..
> > > John Barnett MVP wrote (in news:e0kfpzF$GHA.2180@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl):
> > > > I've used this invaluable application for years now and am very pleased
with it.
> > > Not to be picky, of course, but 2004 to 2006 does technically count as
"years".
> > Yes, technically. But, there's a connotation to the term.
> Not from my point of view there isn't.
Actually the connotation is *specifically* from your point of view. You said
it.
> The point i was making is that 'i've used it for a long time and can recommend
it.'
Exactly. Technically, "years" means two or more so in this case it
/technically/ applies. However when people say "for year", they don't usually
mean "for two or more years", but rahter "for a long time"/"for many, many
years". People don't usually say "for years" when they mean only two, in that
case they would say "for a couple of years". You said "for years" to indicate a
feeling of a long time, not to mean specifically two or more.

Signature
Alec S.
news/alec->synetech/cjb/net