On Jan 28, 1:33 am, "Edward W. Thompson" <thomed...@btopenworld.com>
wrote:
> > If the camera uses a memory card, then a few dollars will get you a
> > cardreader. Put the card in and it becomes a driveletter, perhaps E: which
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Why better? Simply a more expensive alternative.
Not completely. If the digital camera does not have any XP drivers,
the the card reader would be "cheaper" than replacing the camera.
Edward W. Thompson - 29 Jan 2008 07:23 GMT
On Jan 28, 1:33 am, "Edward W. Thompson" <thomed...@btopenworld.com>
wrote:
> "Anteaus" <Ante...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Why better? Simply a more expensive alternative.
Not completely. If the digital camera does not have any XP drivers,
the the card reader would be "cheaper" than replacing the camera.
Agreed, but surely all digital cameras these days have WINXP drivers. If
not I would be surprised they would be 'saleable'. Seems a stretch to think
anyone would buy a digital camera without the means to retrieve the images
included.