Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsWindows VistaWindows XPWindows MeWindows 98Windows 95Virtual PCInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressWindows MediaSecurity
Related Topics
MS Server ProductsMS OfficePC HardwareMore Topics ...

Windows Forum / Windows XP / Remote Desktop / January 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

XP Remote vs SMS

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
JasonW - 30 Jan 2004 02:53 GMT
We are currently using SMS at our site to do remote control of XP, W2K, and
NT boxes. I was looking at the capabilities of XP Remote Assistance and
Remote Desktop, but it seems that it is more limited.

I would like to know if I have the following correct or not:

1. XP Remote Desktop cannot have the remote user logged in at the same time
as the person trying to remotely control the PC. (It logged off the current
user to allow the remote user.)
2. XP Remote Assistance can only be done between XP boxes. (Due to our mix
of OSs, this wouldn't work for us.)
3. XP Remote Assistance uses some form of Windows Messenger. (This icon
appeared in the system tray when we were testing).

If these are true, then we will probably stick with SMS.

-JasonW
Shenan Stanley - 30 Jan 2004 03:16 GMT
> We are currently using SMS at our site to do remote control of XP,
> W2K, and NT boxes. I was looking at the capabilities of XP Remote
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> -JasonW

1. Correct.
2. Correct.  (Or Windows 2003 server to XP..)
   http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=308013
3. Incorrect.  I do not believe messenger is a requirement.

Remote Desktop is more for remote control, not.. well, assisting.
Remote Assistance is more for remote assistance, not.. well, remote
computing.

With a domain, you can "offer" remote assistance to a user - it can be set
up with group policies.  You can decide who can offer as well.

Signature

<- Shenan ->
--

Jeffrey Randow (MVP) - 31 Jan 2004 05:19 GMT
1.  As you present it, correct...  However, since you run in a larger
environment, you can use the shadow functionality to take control of a
remote computer without logging off the remote user (see
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=279656)

2.  XP And above only..

3.  Windows Messenger is not required for Remote Assistance.  WM acts
as one of the transport/connection methods (it is the easiest to set
up), but you can still use other methods to connect.

Jeffrey Randow (Windows Net. & Smart Display MVP)
jeffreyr-support@remotenetworktechnology.com

Please post all responses to the newsgroups for the benefit
of all USENET users.  Messages sent via email may or may not
be answered depending on time availability....

Remote Networking Technology Support Site -
http://www.remotenetworktechnology.com
Windows XP Expert Zone - http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone

>We are currently using SMS at our site to do remote control of XP, W2K, and
>NT boxes. I was looking at the capabilities of XP Remote Assistance and
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>-JasonW
Bill Sanderson - 31 Jan 2004 20:26 GMT
As Shenan mentioned--I'd look at the "offer remote assistance" method--this
eases the connection, in a domain.

> We are currently using SMS at our site to do remote control of XP, W2K,
> and
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> -JasonW
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.