Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsWindows VistaWindows XPWindows MeWindows 98Windows 95Virtual PCInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressWindows MediaSecurity
Related Topics
MS Server ProductsMS OfficePC HardwareMore Topics ...

Windows Forum / Windows XP / Remote Desktop / February 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Is file filetransfer via RD slower than using....

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Johan - 26 Feb 2004 10:51 GMT
Is file filetransfer via RD slower than using normal fileshared folders

If I copy a file within a RD session and pastes it in my real Windows session, is that file transfer slower than if I would have a mapped share and copied the file that way? Hope you understand how I mean :

I have only port 3389 openend and if I want to use normal filesharing within my LAN I guess I would have to open more ports which means less safety?
Jeffrey Randow (MVP) - 27 Feb 2004 02:18 GMT
Yep..  Much slower..  This is due to the fact that RDP was not
optimized for file transfers and it is encrypted, adding more
overhead.

Jeffrey Randow (Windows Net. & Smart Display MVP)
jeffreyr-support@remotenetworktechnology.com

Please post all responses to the newsgroups for the benefit
of all USENET users.  Messages sent via email may or may not
be answered depending on time availability....

Remote Networking Technology Support Site -
http://www.remotenetworktechnology.com
Windows XP Expert Zone - http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone

>Is file filetransfer via RD slower than using normal fileshared folders?
>
>If I copy a file within a RD session and pastes it in my real Windows session, is that file transfer slower than if I would have a mapped share and copied the file that way? Hope you understand how I mean :)
>
>I have only port 3389 openend and if I want to use normal filesharing within my LAN I guess I would have to open more ports which means less safety?
Johan - 27 Feb 2004 12:46 GMT
Ok, thanks. I beleive it's not a good way to transfer files. The RD session must also be opened all the time when I transfer. Didn't think of that first :)
Jeffrey Randow (MVP) - 28 Feb 2004 04:36 GMT
A VPN would be better in this case.  The RDP file redirection is
easier to setup and is good for copying a single "quick" file, but
definitely isn't ideal for multiple/big files.

Jeffrey Randow (Windows Net. & Smart Display MVP)
jeffreyr-support@remotenetworktechnology.com

Please post all responses to the newsgroups for the benefit
of all USENET users.  Messages sent via email may or may not
be answered depending on time availability....

Remote Networking Technology Support Site -
http://www.remotenetworktechnology.com
Windows XP Expert Zone - http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone

>Ok, thanks. I beleive it's not a good way to transfer files. The RD session must also be opened all the time when I transfer. Didn't think of that first :)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.