1. all are valid.
2. not against a pfx file, no.
3. it is really a cryptographic technique to prevent brute force attacks
against the encrypted file
you will not see the same exact file every time, otherwise it would be
subject to various cryptographic attacks.

Signature
David B. Cross [MS]
--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
http://support.microsoft.com
> I have been testing EFS and its recovery as throughly as
> possible before implementing it, and I ran into an
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> 3. What/where is an explanation for the significance of
> the Strong Encryption "iteration count"?