Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsWindows VistaWindows XPWindows MeWindows 98Windows 95Virtual PCInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressWindows MediaSecurity
Related Topics
MS Server ProductsMS OfficePC HardwareMore Topics ...

Windows Forum / Windows XP / Security and Administration / December 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

this is why its good to deactivate ...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Pankyscig - 31 Dec 2004 11:39 GMT
Seems this exploit needed the attack surface created by the service running
on port 445, this is why it's good to shut these services down in addition
to blocking to blocking the incoming port 445 traffuc with a router.
Especially if you're just running a standalone, home system that doesn't
need to talk to other domain members.
Gordon - 31 Dec 2004 11:41 GMT
> Seems this exploit needed the attack surface created by the service
> running on port 445, this is why it's good to shut these services
> down in addition to blocking to blocking the incoming port 445
> traffuc with a router. Especially if you're just running a
> standalone, home system that doesn't need to talk to other domain
> members.

Who are you talking to and about what? Please quote the post you are
replying to.

Thank you.
Cyber-Hun - 31 Dec 2004 11:57 GMT
Sorry, it was in relation to "Worm never seen before " by I.L.S., I had the
focus on the wrong thing.  I reposted it.

>> Seems this exploit needed the attack surface created by the service
>> running on port 445, this is why it's good to shut these services
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Thank you.
Gordon - 31 Dec 2004 12:11 GMT
> Sorry, it was in relation to "Worm never seen before " by I.L.S., I
> had the focus on the wrong thing.  I reposted it.

Easily done! ;-)
Bruce Chambers - 31 Dec 2004 16:32 GMT
> Seems this exploit needed the attack surface created by the service running
> on port 445, this is why it's good to shut these services down in addition
> to blocking to blocking the incoming port 445 traffuc with a router.
> Especially if you're just running a standalone, home system that doesn't
> need to talk to other domain members.

    What _are_ you talking about, and to Whom?

Signature

Bruce Chambers

Help us help you:
http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don't ever count on having
both at once. - RAH

Cyber-Hun - 31 Dec 2004 16:45 GMT
Read the 2nd and 3rd responses to the original post of this thread, all will
be revealed.

>> Seems this exploit needed the attack surface created by the service
>> running on port 445, this is why it's good to shut these services down in
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> What _are_ you talking about, and to Whom?
Bruce Chambers - 31 Dec 2004 16:52 GMT
> Read the 2nd and 3rd responses to the original post of this thread, all will
> be revealed.

    How can you possibly expect anyone to follow a conversation if you keep
changing the subject (and thereby creating a new "thread"), your posting
alias, and never quote any of the material to which you're responding?

Signature

Bruce Chambers

Help us help you:
http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don't ever count on having
both at once. - RAH

Cyber-Hun - 31 Dec 2004 16:56 GMT
How are the answers to those questions not obvious?

>> Read the 2nd and 3rd responses to the original post of this thread, all
>> will be revealed.
>
> How can you possibly expect anyone to follow a conversation if you keep
> changing the subject (and thereby creating a new "thread"), your posting
> alias, and never quote any of the material to which you're responding?
Colin Nash [MVP] - 31 Dec 2004 17:46 GMT
> How are the answers to those questions not obvious?

Isn't the Internet fun?!?! :)
Gordon - 31 Dec 2004 19:06 GMT
> How are the answers to those questions not obvious?
>
>>> Read the 2nd and 3rd responses to the original post of this thread,
>>> all will be revealed.

The point is, this is *NOT* the original thread! It's a *NEW* one.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.