I've always felt like rolling a standard environment more or less
required the old to be blown away and reimaged. It means you have to do
data backups on a per user basis, but in my experience, you usually get
less feature creep and interactions between the old and the new.
Just my opinion, tho. 8)
(j)
James
> Have any of you come acrossed any major issues running an
> XP upgrade from NT 4.0 or W2K? I'm wondering if it would
> be more efficient to upgrade our users in lieu of
> reimaging a few hundred PCs. Any suggestions or comments?
> Thanks!
> Sara