Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsWindows VistaWindows XPWindows MeWindows 98Windows 95Virtual PCInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressWindows MediaSecurity
Related Topics
MS Server ProductsMS OfficePC HardwareMore Topics ...

Windows Forum / Windows XP / Video / February 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

FIREWIRE SPEED PROBLEMS

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
JC IN Q8 - 25 Feb 2006 16:43 GMT
Grateful for help.  Just purchased a Sony HC 42 (Mini DV).  Had to buy a
Firewire and USB 2 Combo as laptop was USB 1.  For some reason, capturing
Video using Movie Maker and Firewire seems to take the same time as the
lenght of the original shot footage.  i.e. 48 minutes rcoreded on the camera
seems to take about the same time to transfer to Movie Maker ready to edit.  
I this normal.  I thought the whoel point bout Firewire was the trasnfer rate
an quality cmpared with USB 2.  Sorry is this is such a novice post...I was
so excited with the new camer and now I am just confused!  Would apprecite
any advice...JC
Cari (MS-MVP) - 25 Feb 2006 17:51 GMT
Capture is ALWAYS in real time.  1 hour of video will take 1 hour to
capture.  It doesn't matter what software you capture with, it's always
going to take 'real time'.
Signature

Cari (MS-MVP)
Windows Technologies, Printing & Imaging
http://www.coribright.com/windows

> Grateful for help.  Just purchased a Sony HC 42 (Mini DV).  Had to buy a
> Firewire and USB 2 Combo as laptop was USB 1.  For some reason, capturing
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> so excited with the new camer and now I am just confused!  Would apprecite
> any advice...JC
JC IN Q8 - 25 Feb 2006 18:17 GMT
Cari,  Thanks for the response...now I feel a bit stupid even posing the
question but to be honest, I thought that the combination of the Camcorder
using Firewire to WMM would somehow operate in quick time.  Thanks for
setting me stright.

So is there any real advantage in using Firewire over USB 2 to perform the
capture if they both take the same time?

Jamie

> Capture is ALWAYS in real time.  1 hour of video will take 1 hour to
> capture.  It doesn't matter what software you capture with, it's always
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> > so excited with the new camer and now I am just confused!  Would apprecite
> > any advice...JC
dnickels - 28 Feb 2006 18:42 GMT
Jamie

I'm not a Firewire expert but it is my understanding that Firewire is less dependent on system resources and it can guarantee a connection fast enough to transfer the video without dropping any frames. On the other hand, USB is more dependent on the system components, such as the processor, and it cannot guarantee to establish or maintain a specific speed. The result can be dropped frames if the system is to busy to process the incoming video stream.

DN

>>> JC IN Q8<JCINQ8@discussions.microsoft.com> 2/25/2006 12:17 PM >>>

Cari,  Thanks for the response...now I feel a bit stupid even posing the
question but to be honest, I thought that the combination of the Camcorder
using Firewire to WMM would somehow operate in quick time.  Thanks for
setting me stright.

So is there any real advantage in using Firewire over USB 2 to perform the
capture if they both take the same time?

Jamie

"Cari (MS-MVP)" wrote:

> Capture is ALWAYS in real time.  1 hour of video will take 1 hour to
> capture.  It doesn't matter what software you capture with, it's always
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> > so excited with the new camer and now I am just confused!  Would apprecite
> > any advice...JC
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.