Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsWindows VistaWindows XPWindows MeWindows 98Windows 95Virtual PCInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressWindows MediaSecurity
Related Topics
MS Server ProductsMS OfficePC HardwareMore Topics ...

Windows Forum / Windows XP / General Topics 1 / May 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Trying to recall where a checksum setting is

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Pete Puma - 26 May 2008 17:48 GMT
Once in XP I came across a setting that allowed the data copied or written to
be "checked" or verified something like that in some general preference box.
Even at the risk of slowing down any copying function, I would prefer this.

Can any one help me with this--sorry to be so vague...

1) I was trying to remember where it was
2) I wondered how it was performing the parity check--but I guess it was
doing checksums of some type

Thanks for reading
GHalleck - 26 May 2008 18:43 GMT
> Once in XP I came across a setting that allowed the data copied or written to
> be "checked" or verified something like that in some general preference box.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Thanks for reading

Thinking of CRC, Cyclic Redundancy Check? There are applications that
provide this additional feature, such as disk-imaging software.
HeyBub - 26 May 2008 22:04 GMT
> Once in XP I came across a setting that allowed the data copied or
> written to be "checked" or verified something like that in some
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Thanks for reading

You may be thinking of the "Verify" option of the COPY command (COPY X Y
/V).

A better techinque is the COMPARE command after finishing the copy (COMP
Xfile Yfile).
Pete Puma - 28 May 2008 16:54 GMT
>> Once in XP I came across a setting that allowed the data copied or
>> written to be "checked" or verified something like that in some
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> A better techinque is the COMPARE command after finishing the copy (COMP
> Xfile Yfile).

Not sure WHAT it did, but there was a checkbox SOMEWHERE in XP during one of
my setups--I'll find it if I have to reenact the 3 Stooges as plumbers.
I remember years ago that all computers sold to government contractors and
military-related desktops had to have 9-bit--as opposed to standard 8-bit,
RAM installed, the last bit being used for parity checking (over my head a
bit, but I get the concept). This was chiefly to prevent bad data in the
delivered files that the gov paid for.
I recall RAM companies selling them in either 8- or 9-bit versions when they
listed their ads.
Back to my magic button: if I can locate that, I will research it on MS to
find out precisely what it does and post back. What I'm ultimately looking
to do is keep the direcotry and copying function stable without the system's
nodes and indexes getting whacky. If you control that, you could run XP for
another 10 years. I hope so.

Signature

Cynic, n.:
       One who looks through rose-colored glasses with a jaundiced
eye.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.